Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Photonic chip-based resonant supercontinuum

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Resonant supercontinuum shows that picosecond, few-picojoule pulses in a silicon-nitride chip microresonator can create a 2,200-line, 28-GHz frequency comb while weakly bound solitons filter out high-frequency pump noise.

desk verdict A genuinely impressive chip-based resonant supercontinuum at 28 GHz with a plausible but not fully nailed-down mechanism for d-dependent noise filtering. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00022 v3 pith:2OCMTBJW submitted 2019-08-30 physics.optics

Miles H. Anderson , Romain Bouchand , Junqiu Liu , Wenle Weng , Ewelina Obrzud , Tobias Herr , Tobias J. Kippenberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords resonantsupercontinuumsolitonmicrocombsdissipativeKerrsolitonssiliconnitridemicroresonatorelectro-opticcombnoisetransfernonlinearfilteringfrequency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes resonant supercontinuum generation: by synchronously driving a dispersion-engineered, low-loss silicon-nitride chip microresonator with pulses about 1 ps long, the cavity's resonant buildup lets the same pulse that would produce almost no broadening in the bare waveguide create a smooth, two-thirds-octave frequency comb with 2,200 lines at a 28 GHz repetition rate. The input pulses carry only 1–6 pJ and have peak powers of a few watts, orders of magnitude below the kilowatt femtosecond pulses normally required for coherent supercontinuum generation. This matters because it fills the efficiency gap that has kept broadband combs out of the 10s-of-GHz, electronically detectable range: fiber supercontinua are efficient only at low repetition rates, while soliton microcombs are efficient only at much higher rates. The paper also claims a dynamical benefit: the generated soliton is weakly bound to the input pulse, so over long times its repetition rate is locked, but fast frequency noise from the driving pulse is filtered out with a cutoff about 100 times below the cavity decay rate, and the cutoff can be tuned by driving the resonator asynchronously.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the trapping of the dissipative Kerr soliton on the driving pulse. The soliton is attracted to a point on the pulse where the intensity-gradient force pulling it toward the pulse edge balances the phase-gradient force from a small positive residual chirp, together with the effective force of the repetition-rate mismatch $d$; the equilibrium obeys $2\pi d + \partial \varphi_S/\partial t = 0$, where $\varphi_S$ is the soliton's angular coordinate in the cavity. Because the trapping gradient is steep near the pulse edge and shallow near the pulse peak, shifting the soliton toward the peak (by making $d$ more positive) makes it more free-running against fast jitter while still locked on average. This equilibrium condition, simulated with the Lugiato–Lefever equation (the standard mean-field model of a driven nonlinear cavity), accounts both for the spectral broadening and for the tunable low-pass noise filtering that protects the comb's outer lines.

What would settle it

Measure the soliton's timing relative to the input pulse while sweeping the repetition-rate mismatch $d$ across the locking range; the trapping model predicts a monotonic shift from the pulse edge toward the pulse peak as $d$ goes from negative to positive, so a null or reversed shift would refute the mechanism. Independently, repeating the noise-transfer measurement with the residual chirp deliberately removed by adjusting the dispersion-compensation stage would test whether the phase gradient is required for the tunable cutoff.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a pulsed drive combined with resonant enhancement produces a dissipative Kerr soliton—a self-sustaining pulse in a driven nonlinear cavity—together with a strong dispersive wave, and that this composite state is the engine of a new kind of supercontinuum. The authors show that, at the maximum cavity detuning, the soliton's bandwidth scales with the square root of the pump power, yielding a 64-THz spectrum with roughly 2,300 measurable lines at 27.88 GHz spacing; they state this is the largest bandwidth–line-count product reported for any microcomb. They further demonstrate, in both experiment and Lugiato–Lefever simulations, that the soliton occupies a trapping point on the driving pulse and is only weakly bound: the comb's repetition rate follows the input at low offset frequencies, but above a cutoff of about 0.5–2 MHz the noise-transfer function falls at −20 dB/decade, even though the cavity linewidth is near 110 MHz. The cutoff can be pushed lower by increasing the repetition-rate mismatch within the locking range, an effect the paper attributes to the soliton sliding toward the pulse center where the trapping gradient is weaker.

Load-bearing premise

The explanation for the tunable noise filtering assumes the soliton's resting position is set by the exact balance between the pulse's intensity gradient and the residual positive chirp used in the simulation; if the real chirp differs in sign or magnitude, the predicted motion of the trapping point—and the mechanism for the lowered cutoff—would not hold, although the observed narrowing of the beatnotes would still stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Broadband, electronically detectable combs near 28 GHz can be produced from picosecond, few-picojoule pulses rather than kilowatt femtosecond pulses, lowering the input requirements for microwave-spacing supercontinuum sources.
  • The reported 2,300-line, 64-THz span at 28 GHz is the largest bandwidth–line-count product for a microcomb to date, and the authors state that improved coupling and dispersion engineering could extend the spectrum to a full octave, enabling $f$–$2f$ self-referencing.
  • Because the soliton's weak binding low-pass filters the driving pulse's repetition-rate noise, a less expensive, noisier RF oscillator can be used if the lock is set near the upper edge of the locking range, preserving coherence of the outer comb lines.
  • The input stage is not restricted to a fiber-based electro-optic comb: any source of GHz-rate picosecond pulses, such as a chip-based mode-locked laser, could drive the resonator, pointing toward a fully integrated broadband comb source.
  • Resonant supercontinuum occupies the previously hard-to-reach parameter region between conventional supercontinuum generation and continuous-wave-driven soliton microcombs, giving applications that need microwave line spacing a single chip-scale route to broad spectra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trapping-gradient picture is correct, the residual chirp of the input pulse becomes a deliberate control parameter: engineering the sign and strength of the chirp should set the soliton's equilibrium trapping point without changing the repetition-rate mismatch, adding an independent knob for noise filtering.
  • The same weak-binding nonlinear filter should generalize to any driven dissipative-soliton system with a modulated background, such as fiber Kerr cavities or other microresonator materials; the quantitative prediction is that the filter cutoff is set by the local slope of the background phase-intensity profile rather than by cavity linewidth alone.
  • Because the noise-transfer simulations deliberately omit higher-order dispersion, Raman scattering, and the spectral filter response, the measured 7.5 MHz linewidth at 1908 nm likely includes contributions beyond the pure transfer mechanism; a fully dispersion-engineered octave-spanning version driven by a low-noise source would reveal how much of that residual width remains.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports 'resonant supercontinuum generation' in a dispersion-engineered Si3N4 microresonator driven by a 13.94 GHz electro-optic comb that synchronously pumps every second cavity round trip. The authors demonstrate a single-soliton state with a strong dispersive wave producing a smooth spectrum of roughly 2,200 resolved lines at 28 GHz repetition rate, using input pulses of 1-6 pJ energy and ~1 ps duration, and they claim the largest bandwidth-line-count product for any microcomb to date. The paper additionally studies the transfer of RF frequency noise from the driving pulse train to the soliton comb lines. Using LLE simulations and heterodyne measurements, they find that noise multiplication is low-pass filtered with a cutoff near a few MHz, i.e., about 100 times below the cavity linewidth, and that this filtering can be strengthened by driving asynchronously (nonzero repetition-rate mismatch d). The mechanism is attributed to the soliton's trapping position on the chirped pulse background, with the cutoff frequency decreasing as the soliton is pushed toward the pulse peak.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a significant advance: it bridges the efficiency gap between conventional supercontinuum generation and soliton microcombs at microwave repetition rates, with a directly measurable 28 GHz repetition rate, a broad and flat spectrum, and record bandwidth-line-count product. The noise-filtering phenomenon is also important for applications such as astrocombs and telecommunications, where RF oscillator noise would otherwise multiply onto distant comb lines. The paper combines a clear experimental demonstration (optical spectra, heterodyne beatnotes, transfer-function measurements) with LLE simulations that reproduce the qualitative behavior, and it makes a falsifiable prediction about the dependence of the filtering cutoff on drive detuning. The main weakness is that the microscopic explanation of the d-dependent filtering relies on the sign and magnitude of the residual input-pulse chirp, which is not directly measured, and on a simplified trapping model.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 (Optimization of Nonlinear Filtering) and Methods] The mechanistic explanation of the d-dependent filtering, summarized by Eq. (1) and Fig. 4(d), depends on the sign of the residual chirp βc = +0.3 ps² imposed on the input pulse. The Methods state that the compression stage 'purposefully leaves' a positive chirp, but no measured spectral phase or FROG retrieval of the pulse at the chip input is reported. If the actual experimental chirp had the opposite sign, the trapping point would shift in the opposite direction as d is varied, and the predicted ordering of cutoff frequencies in Fig. 4(g) could be an artifact of the simulation parameter rather than a property of the experiment. The empirical narrowing of the beatnote in Fig. 4(a,b) would still stand, but the claim that asynchronous driving enhances filtering by moving the soliton into a shallower trap would be unsupported. The authors should either provide a direct measurement of the input pulse phase at the chip facet supporting positive chirp, or demonstrate through simulations with negative chirp that the qualitative trend of decreasing cutoff with increasing d is robust.
  2. [Methods (Eq. (2)) and Fig. 4] The LLE model used for the noise-transfer and d-dependence simulations omits third-order dispersion, Raman scattering, and frequency-dependent loss, with the stated rationale of isolating the pure noise-transfer mechanism. However, the experimental system is specifically engineered to have strong third-order dispersion (D3 ≈ 2π·15 Hz) and exhibits a pronounced dispersive wave and Raman self-frequency shift. Since the trapping position of the soliton on the pulse edge and its response to d could in principle be affected by these omitted terms, the claim that Fig. 4(g) reproduces the measured d-dependence should be supported by at least one full-model simulation (including D3 and Raman) showing that the cutoff-frequency trend with d is unchanged. Without this, the quantitative agreement in Fig. 4(c) and 4(g) may be coincidental.
  3. [Methods (Microresonator)] The inference of D3 from the dispersive-wave location assumes D4 = 0, as stated in the Methods. This assumption is not justified, and the resulting D3 value is used in the full simulation (S.I.) to reproduce the experimental spectrum. If D4 is non-negligible, the inferred D3 could shift, which would affect the simulated soliton duration, dispersive-wave strength, and possibly the trapping dynamics. The authors should provide an uncertainty estimate for D3 or a justification for neglecting D4, for example by comparing the simulated spectrum with an independent dispersion measurement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] Typo: 'magntiude' should be 'magnitude' in the introductory paragraph.
  2. [Coherence properties] Typo: 'possesd' should be 'possessed' in the sentence about the additional filtering effect.
  3. [Fig. 2(c)] The caption 'Lowest energy soliton with minimum pulsed power required' is unclear; specify whether 'dark' refers to the minimum-power soliton and 'light' to the fully formed spectrum.
  4. [Eq. (1)] The notation ∂φS/∂t for the soliton angular coordinate is introduced without defining the time variable or the reference frame; please clarify that this is the drift in the fast-time frame over slow time.
  5. [Fig. 4(b)] The text states that the multiplied RF-1 noise is overlaid in Fig. 4(b), but it would be helpful to state explicitly whether the measured d-scan was performed only with RF-1, and whether RF-2 shows a similar d-dependence.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor circularity in the spectral simulation's D3 input, but central record-comb and noise-filtering claims are independently supported.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods (Microresonator) and Results (Resonant Supercontinuum Results), Fig. 2(c)]
    "The location of the dispersive wave at ωDW = 2π·154 THz allows us to infer D3≈− 3D2D1/(ωDW−ω0) = 2π·15 Hz (β3 =−120 fs3/mm), when assuming D4 = 0. ... Simulations shown in Fig. 2(a,b) replicating the measured spectrum predict a distorted DKS due to the strong dispersive wave emission, and having a duration of ∼ 24 fs."

    D3 is not independently measured; it is inferred from the measured dispersive-wave position via the phase-matching relation, assuming D4 = 0. The simulation that includes this D3 is then said to replicate the measured spectrum and to predict a DKS with strong dispersive-wave emission, including a dispersive wave at 1957 nm. The location of that spectral feature is fixed by the fitted D3, so the simulation's dispersive-wave prediction is forced by construction. This is not load-bearing for the paper's main claims: the 2,300-line comb, 28 GHz beatnote, and d-dependent transfer-function narrowing are all direct experimental results, and the main noise-transfer LLE (Methods Eq. 2) deliberately omits third-order dispersion.

full rationale

The central claims are not circular. The record-comb demonstration rests on measured optical spectra and RF beatnotes; the noise-filtering claim rests on heterodyne linewidth and frequency-noise transfer functions measured as the RF source and repetition-rate mismatch are varied. The LLE simulations of noise transfer use parameters stated in Methods (κ = 2π·100 MHz, D2 = 2π·28 kHz, P0 = 900 mW, δω = 6κ, M = 24, βc = +0.3 ps²); the d-dependent cutoff-frequency reduction emerges from the simulation rather than being fitted to the experiment. The positive-chirp assumption and trapping-gradient model are explicit modeling choices; if the chirp sign were wrong, the proposed mechanism would be unsupported, but that is a correctness risk, not a circular derivation. The one genuine self-feeding step is the D3 inference from the dispersive-wave location, which makes the spectral replication non-predictive for that feature; however, that parameter is absent from the noise-transfer LLE and the record-comb and filtering claims stand on direct observation. Citations [18], [20], and [21] involve overlapping authors, but they are used as context and supporting agreement, not as the sole justification for any central claim; no uniqueness theorem is imported from them. Overall, no central result is equivalent by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard models (LLE, soliton trapping) and on a few parameters chosen to resemble the experiment. The most load-bearing choices are the inferred D3, the simulation parameters that are not matched to the exact device, and the sign/magnitude of pulse chirp. These are reasonable but not independently verified within the paper.

free parameters (6)
  • D3 (third-order dispersion) = 2π·15 Hz
    Inferred from dispersive wave location using D3 ≈ −3D2D1/(ωDW−ω0) with assumption D4 = 0; used in spectral simulations.
  • LLE simulation linewidth κ = 2π·100 MHz
    Chosen similar to experimental loaded linewidth of 2π·110 MHz; affects noise transfer cut-off in simulation.
  • LLE simulation dispersion D2 = 2π·28 kHz
    Chosen in simulation; experiment has D2 = 2π·7.2 kHz. This changes the comb dynamics and is not matched to the specific device.
  • LLE simulation nonlinearity g = 2π·0.054 Hz
    Chosen to represent a basic Si3N4 resonator; not derived from experimental measurement in the paper.
  • Input pulse chirp βc = +0.3 ps²
    Residual normal dispersion applied to simulated pulse spectrum to match experimental positive chirp; sign and magnitude are load-bearing for the trapping-position mechanism.
  • Other LLE driving parameters (P0, δω, M) = P0 = 900 mW, δω = 6κ, M = 24
    Pump peak power, detuning, and number of comb lines in simulation; chosen to reflect a basic resonator above threshold.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LLE mean-field model for Kerr comb dynamics
    Used in Methods Eq. (2) to model the resonator; neglects higher-order dispersion, Raman, and spectral loss in main text.
  • domain assumption Sub-harmonic pumping: input pulse train at 13.94 GHz drives every second cavity roundtrip, so comb spacing is 2×feo
    Assumed in experiments and efficiency calculations; beatnote confirms 27.88 GHz but the factor-of-2 loss in conversion efficiency depends on it.
  • domain assumption Trapping condition 2πd + ∂φS/∂t = 0 (Eq. 1) and the potential-well picture from refs 48, 64, 65
    Used to explain how d shifts soliton position on the pulse and changes the local trapping gradient.
  • ad hoc to paper D4 = 0 when inferring D3
    Methods state D3 inferred when assuming D4 = 0; if D4 is non-negligible, the inferred D3 and simulated spectrum are affected.
  • domain assumption Frequency noise of comb lines dominated by RF noise transfer from the driving pulse
    Stated in noise transfer section: assuming other sources of laser noise are small by comparison; underlies interpretation of heterodyne linewidths and transfer functions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photonic chip-based resonant supercontinuum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2OCMTBJW

@misc{pith2026190900022,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photonic chip-based resonant supercontinuum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2OCMTBJW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00022}
}
abstract

Supercontinuum generation in optical fibers is one of the most dramatic nonlinear effects discovered, allowing short pulses to be converted into multi-octave spanning coherent spectra. However, generating supercontinua that are both coherent and broadband requires pulses that are simultaneously ultrashort with high peak power. This results in a reducing efficiency with increasing pulse repetition rate, that has hindered supercontinua at microwave line spacing, i.e. 10s of GHz. Soliton microcombs by contrast, can generate octave-spanning spectra, but with good conversion efficiency only at vastly higher repetition rates in the 100s of GHz. Here, we bridge this efficiency gap with resonant supercontinuum, allowing supercontinuum generation using input pulses with an ultra-low 6 picojoule energy, and duration of 1 picosecond, 10-fold longer than what is typical. By applying synchronous pulse-driving to a dispersion-engineered, low-loss Si$_3$N$_4$ photonic chip microresonator, we generate dissipative Kerr solitons with a strong dispersive wave, both bound to the input pulse. This creates a smooth, flattened 2,200 line frequency comb, with an electronically detectable repetition rate of 28 GHz, constituting the largest bandwidth-line-count product for any microcomb generated to date. Strikingly, we observe that solitons exist in a weakly bound state with the input pulse, stabilizing their repetition rate, but simultaneously allowing noise transfer from one to the other to be suppressed even for offset frequencies 100 times lower than the linear cavity decay rate. We demonstrate that this nonlinear filtering can be enhanced by pulse-driving asynchronously, in order to preserve the coherence of the comb. Taken together, our work establishes resonant supercontinuum as a promising route to broadband and coherent spectra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00022 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (b). Also overlaid is µ q S (rf1) f , where S (rf1) f here is the independently measured frequency noise spectrum of the signal generator RF-1 at 14 GHz, with comb line µ = 2 × 1300, (factor of 2 being from the half rep-rate driving). We further plot the corresponding …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author R. R. \ Alfano \ and\ author S. L. \ Shapiro ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.592 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 24 ,\ pages 592 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.24.592 1970

  2. [2]

    author author J. K. \ Ranka , author R. S. \ Windeler ,\ and\ author A. J. \ Stentz ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.25.000025 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 25 ,\ pages 25 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1364/ol.25.000025

  3. [3]

    author author T. A. \ Birks , author W. J. \ Wadsworth ,\ and\ author P. S. J. \ Russell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.25.001415 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 25 ,\ pages 1415 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.25.001415

  4. [4]

    author author D. J. \ Jones , author S. A. \ Diddams , author J. K. \ Ranka , author A. Stentz , author R. S. \ Windeler , author J. L. \ Hall ,\ and\ author S. T. \ Cundiff ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5466.635 journal journal Science \ volume 288 ,\ pages 635 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.635

  5. [5]

    Udem , author R

    author author T. Udem , author R. Holzwarth ,\ and\ author T. W. \ H\"ansch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/416233a journal journal Nature \ volume 416 ,\ pages 233 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/416233a 2002

  6. [6]

    Nakazawa , author K

    author author M. Nakazawa , author K. Tamura , author H. Kubota ,\ and\ author E. Yoshida ,\ https://doi.org/10.1006/ofte.1998.0253 journal journal Optical Fiber Technology \ volume 4 ,\ pages 215 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    author author J. M. \ Dudley , author G. Genty ,\ and\ author S. Coen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1135 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 78 ,\ pages 1135 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.1135 2006

  8. [8]

    Xie , author R

    author author X. Xie , author R. Bouchand , author D. Nicolodi , author M. Giunta , author W. H\"ansel , author M. Lezius , author A. Joshi , author S. Datta , author C. Alexandre , author M. Lours , author P.-A. \ Tremblin , author G. Santarelli , author R. Holzwarth ,\ and\ author Y. Le Coq ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.215 journal journal Nat...

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.215

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Ideguchi , author S

    author author T. Ideguchi , author S. Holzner , author B. Bernhardt , author G. Guelachvili , author N. Picqu\'e ,\ and\ author T. W. \ H\"ansch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12607 journal journal Nature \ volume 502 ,\ pages 355 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Marin-Palomo , author J

    author author P. Marin-Palomo , author J. N. \ Kemal , author M. Karpov , author A. Kordts , author J. Pfeifle , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author P. Trocha , author S. Wolf , author V. Brasch , author M. H. \ Anderson , author R. Rosenberger , author K. Vijayan , author W. ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author M. T. \ Murphy , author T. Udem , author R. Holzwarth , author A. Sizmann , author L. Pasquini , author C. Araujo-Hauck , author H. Dekker , author S. D'Odorico , author M. Fischer , author T. W. \ H\"ansch ,\ and\ author A. Manescau ,\ https://doi.org/10.1111/j....

  4. [12]

    Herr , author V

    author author T. Herr , author V. Brasch , author J. D. \ Jost , author C. Y. \ Wang , author N. M. \ Kondratiev , author M. L. \ Gorodetsky ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.343 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 8 ,\ pages 145 (...

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    author author T. J. \ Kippenberg , author A. L. \ Gaeta , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author M. L. \ Gorodetsky ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8083 journal journal Science \ volume 361 ,\ pages eaan8083 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Li , author T

    author author Q. Li , author T. C. \ Briles , author D. A. \ Westly , author T. E. \ Drake , author J. R. \ Stone , author B. R. \ Ilic , author S. A. \ Diddams , author S. B. \ Papp ,\ and\ author K. Srinivasan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000193 journal journal Optica...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author C. Herkommer , author J. Liu , author H. Guo , author M. Karpov , author E. Lucas , author M. Zervas ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000684 journal journal Optica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 684 ( year 20...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Bao , author L

    author author C. Bao , author L. Zhang , author A. Matsko , author Y. Yan , author Z. Zhao , author G. Xie , author A. M. \ Agarwal , author L. C. \ Kimerling , author J. Michel , author L. Maleki ,\ and\ author A. E. \ Willner ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.006126 journal j...

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author A. L. \ Gaeta , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0358-x journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 158 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Obrzud , author S

    author author E. Obrzud , author S. Lecomte ,\ and\ author T. Herr ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.140 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 11 ,\ pages nphoton.2017.140 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Liu , author A

    author author J. Liu , author A. S. \ Raja , author M. Karpov , author B. Ghadiani , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author B. Du , author N. J. \ Engelsen , author H. Guo , author M. Zervas ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001347 journal jour...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Weng , author E

    author author W. Weng , author E. Lucas , author G. Lihachev , author V. E. \ Lobanov , author H. Guo , author M. L. \ Gorodetsky ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.013902 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 122 ,\ pages 0...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Brasch , author E

    author author V. Brasch , author E. Obrzud , author S. Lecomte ,\ and\ author T. Herr ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09715 journal journal arXiv:1907.09715 [physics] \ ( year 2019 ) ,\ note arXiv: 1907.09715 NoStop

    1907 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bellini \ and\ author T

    author author M. Bellini \ and\ author T. W. \ H\"ansch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.25.001049 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 25 ,\ pages 1049 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author P. S. J. \ Russell ,\ https://www.osapublishing.org/jlt/abstract.cfm?uri=jlt-24-12-4729 journal journal Journal of Lightwave Technology \ volume 24 ,\ pages 4729 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  16. [24]

    author author D. V. \ Skryabin \ and\ author A. V. \ Gorbach ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1287 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 82 ,\ pages 1287 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    Herrmann , author U

    author author J. Herrmann , author U. Griebner , author N. Zhavoronkov , author A. Husakou , author D. Nickel , author J. C. \ Knight , author W. J. \ Wadsworth , author P. S. J. \ Russell ,\ and\ author G. Korn ,\ journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 88 ,\ https:/...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Akhmediev \ and\ author M

    author author N. Akhmediev \ and\ author M. Karlsson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.2602 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 51 ,\ pages 2602 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  19. [27]

    author author K. M. \ Hilligsøe , author H. N. \ Paulsen , author J. Thøgersen , author S. R. \ Keiding ,\ and\ author J. J. \ Larsen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.20.001887 journal journal JOSA B \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1887 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi

  20. [28]

    \ Yeom , author E

    author author D.-I. \ Yeom , author E. C. \ M\"agi , author M. R. E. \ Lamont , author M. A. F. \ Roelens , author L. Fu ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Eggleton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.000660 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 33 ,\ pages 660 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi

  21. [29]

    Halir , author Y

    author author R. Halir , author Y. Okawachi , author J. S. \ Levy , author M. A. \ Foster , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.001685 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 37 ,\ pages 1685 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    Leo , author S.-P

    author author F. Leo , author S.-P. \ Gorza , author J. Safioui , author P. Kockaert , author S. Coen , author U. Dave , author B. Kuyken ,\ and\ author G. Roelkens ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003623 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 39 ,\ pages 3623 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    Guo , author C

    author author H. Guo , author C. Herkommer , author A. Billat , author D. Grassani , author C. Zhang , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author W. Weng , author C.-S. \ Br\`es ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0144-1 journal journal Nature Phot...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Wu , author V

    author author R. Wu , author V. Torres-Company , author D. E. \ Leaird ,\ and\ author A. M. \ Weiner ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.006045 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 21 ,\ pages 6045 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    Beha , author D

    author author K. Beha , author D. C. \ Cole , author P. Del’Haye , author A. Coillet , author S. A. \ Diddams ,\ and\ author S. B. \ Papp ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000406 journal journal Optica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 406 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [34]

    Obrzud , author M

    author author E. Obrzud , author M. Rainer , author A. Harutyunyan , author B. Chazelas , author M. Cecconi , author A. Ghedina , author E. Molinari , author S. Kundermann , author S. Lecomte , author F. Pepe , author F. Wildi , author F. Bouchy ,\ and\ author T. Herr ,\ https...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author D. R. \ Carlson , author D. D. \ Hickstein , author W. Zhang , author A. J. \ Metcalf , author F. Quinlan , author S. A. \ Diddams ,\ and\ author S. B. \ Papp ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat6451 journal journal Science \ volume 361 ,\ pages 1358 ( year 201...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Leo , author L

    author author F. Leo , author L. Gelens , author P. Emplit , author M. Haelterman ,\ and\ author S. Coen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.009180 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 21 ,\ pages 9180 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    Lucas , author M

    author author E. Lucas , author M. Karpov , author H. Guo , author M. L. \ Gorodetsky ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00719-w journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 8 ,\ pages 736 ( year 2017 a ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Anderson , author F

    author author M. Anderson , author F. Leo , author S. Coen , author M. Erkintalo ,\ and\ author S. G. \ Murdoch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001071 journal journal Optica \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1071 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    Wang , author F

    author author Y. Wang , author F. Leo , author J. Fatome , author M. Erkintalo , author S. G. \ Murdoch ,\ and\ author S. Coen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000855 journal journal Optica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 855 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    Akhmediev \ and\ editor A

    editor N. Akhmediev \ and\ editor A. Ankiewicz ,\ eds.,\ https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540782162 title Dissipative Solitons : From Optics to Biology and Medicine ,\ Lecture Notes in Physics \ ( publisher Springer-Verlag ,\ address Berlin Heidelberg ,\ year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  33. [41]

    author author Ewelina Obrzud , author Monica Rainer , author Avet Harutyunyan , author Miles H. Anderson , author Junqiu Liu , author Michael Geiselmann , author Bruno Chazelas , author Stefan Kundermann , author Steve Lecomte , author Massimo Cecconi , author Adriano Ghedina ...

    doi

  34. [42]

    \ Suh , author X

    author author M.-G. \ Suh , author X. Yi , author Y.-H. \ Lai , author S. Leifer , author I. S. \ Grudinin , author G. Vasisht , author E. C. \ Martin , author M. P. \ Fitzgerald , author G. Doppmann , author J. Wang , author D. Mawet , author S. B. \ Papp , author S. A. \ Did...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Hu , author F

    author author H. Hu , author F. D. \ Ros , author M. Pu , author F. Ye , author K. Ingerslev , author E. P. d. \ Silva , author M. Nooruzzaman , author Y. Amma , author Y. Sasaki , author T. Mizuno , author Y. Miyamoto , author L. Ottaviano , author E. Semenova , author P. Gua...

    doi

  36. [44]

    Malinowski , author A

    author author M. Malinowski , author A. Rao , author P. Delfyett ,\ and\ author S. Fathpour ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983113 journal journal APL Photonics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 066101 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Lilienfein , author C

    author author N. Lilienfein , author C. Hofer , author M. Högner , author T. Saule , author M. Trubetskov , author V. Pervak , author E. Fill , author C. Riek , author A. Leitenstorfer , author J. Limpert , author F. Krausz ,\ and\ author I. Pupeza ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Okawachi , author M

    author author Y. Okawachi , author M. R. E. \ Lamont , author K. Luke , author D. O. \ Carvalho , author M. Yu , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003535 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 39 ,\ pages 3535 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  39. [47]

    Okawachi , author M

    author author Y. Okawachi , author M. Yu , author J. Cardenas , author X. Ji , author A. Klenner , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.004627 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 43 ,\ pages 4627 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  40. [48]

    Hendry , author W

    author author I. Hendry , author W. Chen , author Y. Wang , author B. Garbin , author J. Javaloyes , author G.-L. \ Oppo , author S. Coen , author S. G. \ Murdoch ,\ and\ author M. Erkintalo ,\ journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 97 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.9...

    doi

  41. [49]

    Ishizawa , author T

    author author A. Ishizawa , author T. Nishikawa , author A. Mizutori , author H. Takara , author A. Takada , author T. Sogawa ,\ and\ author M. Koga ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.029186 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 21 ,\ pages 29186 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  42. [50]

    Kobayashi , author H

    author author T. Kobayashi , author H. Yao , author K. Amano , author Y. Fukushima , author A. Morimoto ,\ and\ author T. Sueta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/3.135 journal journal IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics \ volume 24 ,\ pages 382 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [51]

    Fujiwara , author M

    author author M. Fujiwara , author M. Teshima , author J. Kani , author H. Suzuki , author N. Takachio ,\ and\ author K. Iwatsuki ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2003.819147 journal journal Journal of Lightwave Technology \ volume 21 ,\ pages 2705 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  44. [52]

    Coen \ and\ author M

    author author S. Coen \ and\ author M. Erkintalo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.001790 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 38 ,\ pages 1790 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    Lucas , author H

    author author E. Lucas , author H. Guo , author J. D. \ Jost , author M. Karpov ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.043822 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 95 ,\ pages 043822 ( year 2017 b ) NoStop

    doi

  46. [54]

    Karpov , author H

    author author M. Karpov , author H. Guo , author A. Kordts , author V. Brasch , author M. H. \ Pfeiffer , author M. Zervas , author M. Geiselmann ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.103902 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volum...

    doi

  47. [55]

    Yi , author Q.-F

    author author X. Yi , author Q.-F. \ Yang , author K. Y. \ Yang ,\ and\ author K. Vahala ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.003419 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 41 ,\ pages 3419 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    author author E. S. \ Lamb , author D. R. \ Carlson , author D. D. \ Hickstein , author J. R. \ Stone , author S. A. \ Diddams ,\ and\ author S. B. \ Papp ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.024030 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 9 ,\ pages 024030 ( ye...

    doi

  49. [57]

    Brasch , author M

    author author V. Brasch , author M. Geiselmann , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.029312 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 24 ,\ pages 29312 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    Liu , author E

    author author J. Liu , author E. Lucas , author A. S. \ Raja , author J. He , author J. Riemensberger , author R. N. \ Wang , author M. Karpov , author H. Guo , author R. Bouchand ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10372 journal journal arXiv:1901.1...

    1901 arXiv

  51. [59]

    author author L. A. \ Lugiato \ and\ author R. Lefever ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2209 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 58 ,\ pages 2209 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  52. [60]

    author author G. P. \ Agrawal ,\ in\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-045142-5.50009-X booktitle Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Second Edition) ,\ series and number Optics and Photonics ,\ editor edited by\ editor G. P. \ Agrawal \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ addre...

    doi

  53. [61]

    Guo , author M

    author author H. Guo , author M. Karpov , author E. Lucas , author A. Kordts , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author V. Brasch , author G. Lihachev , author V. E. \ Lobanov , author M. L. \ Gorodetsky ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3893 journal...

    doi

  54. [62]

    author author G. D. \ Domenico , author S. Schilt ,\ and\ author P. Thomann ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.004801 journal journal Applied Optics \ volume 49 ,\ pages 4801 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  55. [63]

    Schiemangk , author S

    author author M. Schiemangk , author S. Spießberger , author A. Wicht , author G. Erbert , author G. Tr\"ankle ,\ and\ author A. Peters ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.007138 journal journal Applied Optics \ volume 53 ,\ pages 7138 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  56. [64]

    author author J. K. \ Jang , author M. Erkintalo , author S. Coen ,\ and\ author S. G. \ Murdoch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8370 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 6 ,\ pages 7370 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  57. [65]

    Hendry , author B

    author author I. Hendry , author B. Garbin , author S. G. \ Murdoch , author S. Coen ,\ and\ author M. Erkintalo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.023829 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 100 ,\ pages 023829 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  58. [66]

    Javaloyes , author P

    author author J. Javaloyes , author P. Camelin , author M. Marconi ,\ and\ author M. Giudici ,\ journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 116 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.133901 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.133901 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  59. [67]

    author author W. D. \ Phillips ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.721 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 70 ,\ pages 721 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  60. [68]

    author author M. L. \ Davenport , author S. Liu ,\ and\ author J. E. \ Bowers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000468 journal journal Photonics Research \ volume 6 ,\ pages 468 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  61. [69]

    author author P. J. \ Delfyett , author A. Klee , author K. Bagnell , author P. Juodawlkis , author J. Plant ,\ and\ author A. Zaman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.000D39 journal journal Applied Optics \ volume 58 ,\ pages D39 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  62. [70]

    author author G. F. R. \ Chen , author J. R. \ Ong , author T. Y. L. \ Ang , author S. T. \ Lim , author C. E. \ Png ,\ and\ author D. T. H. \ Tan ,\ journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 7 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07618-6 10.1038/s41598-017-07618-6 ( year 2...

    doi

  63. [71]

    Moille , author Q

    author author G. Moille , author Q. Li , author T. C. \ Briles , author S.-P. \ Yu , author T. Drake , author X. Lu , author A. Rao , author D. Westly , author S. B. \ Papp ,\ and\ author K. Srinivasan ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11002 journal journal arXiv:1907.11002 [physic...

    1907 arXiv

  64. [72]

    author author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author C. Herkommer , author J. Liu , author T. Morais , author M. Zervas , author M. Geiselmann ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2018.2808258 journal journal IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Elect...

    2018

  65. [73]

    Liu , author V

    author author J. Liu , author V. Brasch , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author A. Kordts , author A. N. \ Kamel , author H. Guo , author M. Geiselmann ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.003134 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 41 ,\ pages 3...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.