Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

How effective is machine learning to detect long transient gravitational waves from neutron stars in a real search?

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One CNN trained in one band finds neutron-star signals in any band, matching the standard search's sensitivity and catching signals it misses.

desk verdict A genuinely useful empirical study of CNNs for long-duration neutron-star transients: the cross-band generalization and real-data search are new and mostly well supported, but the headline sensitivity comparison and the cross-detector transfer both need tightening before the numbers are taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02262 v1 pith:Q7W7MDDN submitted 2019-09-05 astro-ph.IM physics.data-an

Andrew L. Miller , Pia Astone , Sabrina D'Antonio , Sergio Frasca , Giuseppe Intini , Iuri La Rosa , Paola Leaci , Simone Mastrogiovanni
show 7 more authors
Federico Muciaccia Andonis Mitidis Cristiano Palomba Ornella J. Piccinni Akshat Singhal Bernard F. Whiting Luca Rei
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMphysics.data-an
keywords gravitationalwavesneutronstarslong-durationtransientsconvolutionalneuralnetworksmachinelearningGeneralizedFrequencyHoughGW170817remnanttime-frequencymaps
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) can be trusted to find long-lived gravitational-wave signals from isolated neutron stars in real detector data. The authors establish that a single CNN trained on signal/noise maps in one 150 Hz band generalizes to other frequency bands and to signal shapes it never saw, with detection efficiencies comparable to the established Generalized FrequencyHough algorithm and at orders-of-magnitude lower computational cost. They show that false-alarm probability can be tuned by choosing a frequency-dependent threshold on the network's output, and that only a modest amount of training data is required. Using these results, they run the first real-data machine-learning search for an isolated neutron star signal, looking for a remnant of the neutron-star merger GW170817, and find no significant candidate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reduced time/frequency map: each 2000 s stretch of whitened, line-cleaned detector data is converted into a peakmap and then downsampled by taking the maximum value in each 16x16 block above a 2.5-sigma threshold. These maps are fed to a CNN with five convolution blocks (zero-padding, convolution, ReLU, max-pooling) and two fully connected layers ending in a softmax that outputs a signal probability. The GFH, the comparison method, maps power-law curves in the time/frequency plane to lines in a parameter plane of initial frequency and spindown. The persistency veto, which removes frequency bins that persistently show excess peaks, is what keeps the CNNs from treating noise lines as signals.

What would settle it

Train the same network on one 150 Hz band of O2 Livingston data, then run it on a large sample of Hanford noise maps from a different epoch (or on O3/O4 data) without retraining; if the false alarm probability at the calibrated threshold is far above 1% even after per-band recalibration, or if the detection efficiency on time-varying-braking-index injections falls below the GFH's, the transferability claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that CNNs can be a practical search tool for long transients from neutron stars, not just a laboratory curiosity. Trained on roughly 20,000 injections plus about 2,000 real noise maps from LIGO Livingston in a single 150 Hz band, the network distinguishes signal from noise in any band across 100-1900 Hz, including bands and braking-index behaviors it never saw. Its sensitivity curves match the Generalized FrequencyHough, and it detects signals with time-varying braking index that the GFH cannot recover because they violate the power-law model. The false alarm probability is controlled by selecting a threshold on the softmax output; the required threshold varies by band. Applied to one week of O2 data after GW170817, the CNN plus GFH pipeline found no significant candidate and produced upper limits consistent with the previous search.

Load-bearing premise

A CNN trained on about 2,000 Livingston noise maps from one observing run in a single 150 Hz band transfers to other frequency bands, other time periods, and the Hanford detector, with only the output threshold recalibrated per band.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A CNN can act as a fast trigger generator: it flags time/frequency maps that deserve a GFH follow-up, cutting the compute from minutes per map to microseconds.
  • Because one trained network covers many bands and signal morphologies, a search can be set up with a few thousand injections rather than exhaustive parameter-space coverage.
  • The method opens a new observational window: signals with time-varying braking index, invisible to power-law searches, become detectable.
  • Low-latency searches become feasible: training on about 23 days of noise suffices, so the network can be retrained on fresh data quickly without discarding much data.
  • False alarms are manageable in practice: with per-band thresholds around 0.7-0.95, the false alarm probability can be held near 1%, which is acceptable for a trigger stage followed by a more precise method.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transferability holds across observing runs, a single network pretrained on O2 data could serve for O3/O4 searches with only per-band threshold recalibration, a direct extension the paper leaves for future work.
  • The CNN's extreme sensitivity to spectral lines could be repurposed: the same network, probed or inverted, might serve as a line-detection and diagnostics tool for detector characterization.
  • Combining two or three detectors' maps into a single image (RGB synthesis), which the authors mention as future work, should lower false alarms because noise lines are largely detector-specific; this is a natural testable next step.
  • Extending the CNN to directly estimate the braking index and its time derivative, which the authors say they are working on, would remove the need for a GFH parameter loop entirely and make the pipeline fully machine-learning driven.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents an empirical study of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for detecting long-duration transient gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars. It trains CNNs on reduced time/frequency maps built from O2 Livingston data, characterizes detection efficiency and false-alarm probability as functions of training-set size, braking index, frequency band, and output threshold pthr, compares the CNN against the Generalized FrequencyHough (GFH) and other architectures, and applies the network to a one-week search for a GW170817 remnant. The central claims are: a CNN trained on a single 150 Hz band can be applied to other bands and to both LIGO detectors; CNN sensitivity is comparable to the GFH while being orders of magnitude faster; CNNs can detect signals with time-varying braking index that the GFH cannot; and the authors have performed the first machine-learning-based search for an isolated-neutron-star gravitational-wave signal.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a useful proof-of-principle: it shows that a small CNN can act as a fast trigger generator for long-transient searches, and it includes a concrete search design and a real-data demonstration. Strengths include the 1255-retraining error analysis, the explicit treatment of pthr and persistent-line vetoes, the robustness tests across frequency bands and signal morphologies, and the final search with GFH follow-up. I found no circularity: training and threshold selection use simulated injections in real noise, and the final search is on previously unseen data. The significance is, however, conditional on two calibration questions: transfer of the network to Hanford data and fairness of the CNN-versus-GFH sensitivity comparison.

major comments (3)
  1. [VI B, VI C (cf. IV C)] The real search applies to Hanford data a network whose false-alarm thresholds were calibrated exclusively on O2 Livingston data, without any Hanford-only false-alarm or efficiency measurement. Section IV C determines pthr from 500 Livingston noise maps, and Section VI B accepts Hanford triggers with p > 0.9, relying on time coincidence to control false alarms. A null result is compatible with both a well-calibrated and a miscalibrated classifier, so the CNN upper limits in Section VI C are not fully supported as presented. Please add noise-only Hanford maps to measure the false-alarm probability at the chosen threshold, and ideally Hanford injection studies to show that the detection efficiency also transfers.
  2. [IV E, Fig. 6] The headline CNN-versus-GFH sensitivity comparison is made at different false-alarm levels: the text reports about 1% false-alarm probability for the CNN/ANN and about 0.01% for the GFH at the operating points used. 'Similar efficiencies' is therefore not an apples-to-apples statement. Please provide efficiency curves at matched false-alarm probability, or ROC-style results, before concluding that the CNN is comparable in sensitivity to the GFH.
  3. [IV B, Fig. 3] The paper states that the GFH cannot detect signals with time-varying braking index and delta-n/delta-t in [-1e-4, 1e-4] /s, but no GFH efficiency on those injections is shown in this manuscript. This claim is load-bearing for the 'signals to which the GFH is blind' novelty. Please quantify GFH performance on the same varying-braking-index test set, or restrict the statement to the power-law model of Eq. (3) with a clear caveat.
minor comments (6)
  1. [IV A, Fig. 2] The 32 amplitude curves in Fig. 2 are difficult to read without a legend or colorbar; please label the amplitudes explicitly or use a color scale.
  2. [IV D] Please clarify whether the 1255 retrainings differ only by random seeds or also by data batching and dropout realizations, and state which of the resulting networks is used for the thresholds applied in Sections IV E and VI.
  3. [VI B] Please report the total number of time/frequency maps analyzed in the search so that the reader can convert the 50 CNN triggers into a false-alarm rate rather than only an event count.
  4. [VI C] The blue 'CNN-only' upper-limit curve needs an explicit detection criterion: which pthr is used, and what false-alarm probability is assumed, since pthr is not by itself a calibrated significance.
  5. [IV and V] Please state explicitly for each characterization result that the noise maps used for testing were disjoint from the noise maps used for training; the paper warns about this in Section V but does not always make the train/test separation explicit for the individual figures.
  6. [IV E] If AlexNet is used as a comparison architecture, please cite the original AlexNet reference in addition to the in-house implementation reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CNN's detection efficiency and false-alarm claims are empirically measured on held-out injections and noise maps, with sensitivity benchmarked against the independent GFH.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical and self-contained. A CNN is trained on simulated power-law signals injected into real O2 Livingston noise maps, and detection efficiency is measured on unseen injections across multiple frequency bands and across signal morphologies not in the training set. False-alarm probabilities are measured on held-out noise maps, and sensitivity is compared directly with the Generalized FrequencyHough on identical injections. The real search for a GW170817 remnant uses previously unseen Hanford and Livingston data, produces a null result, and reports upper limits compared with a prior published search. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no definition ties the claimed capability to its training inputs in a way that forces the conclusion. The paper does rely on the authors' prior work for the CNN architecture, resolution-reduction factor, and GFH implementation, but those citations supply implementation and methodological choices rather than the validation itself; the load-bearing performance claims are established by the paper's own measurements against an independent baseline and on real data. A possible limitation is that threshold calibration is performed on Livingston noise and then applied to Hanford data without a per-detector false-alarm measurement, but this is a robustness or transferability concern, not a circularity: nothing in the analysis defines the Hanford result in terms of the Livingston calibration. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central empirical claims rest on the standard power-law signal model, preprocessing choices inherited from prior work, and the calibrated detection threshold. The main unproven premise is the transferability of a single-band network to other bands and detectors.

free parameters (3)
  • pthr = 0.9
    Detection threshold on the CNN softmax output, chosen to keep false alarm probability near 1 percent and shown to be frequency dependent in Section IV C. It is an analysis choice, not a physical constant.
  • resolution reduction parameters = 16x16 blocks, 2.5 sigma threshold
    Time-frequency maps are compressed by taking maxima over 16x16 blocks above 2.5 standard deviations. These values are inherited from prior work [32] and the CNN depends on this preprocessing.
  • persistency veto threshold = 1 standard deviation
    Frequency bins with persistent peaks more than 1 standard deviation above the median are zeroed. This choice affects false alarm rates and is part of the peakmap cleaning procedure.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Power-law frequency evolution Eq. (3) describes isolated neutron star spin-down.
    All training and testing injections are generated from this braking-index model; a real signal outside this family may not be detected.
  • domain assumption R-mode and ellipticity amplitude models, Eqs. (4) and (5), describe the emitted strain.
    The amplitude evolution, and hence the visibility of signals in time-frequency maps, is taken from prior neutron star physics literature.
  • domain assumption A CNN trained on one 150 Hz band generalizes to other bands and signal morphologies.
    This transferability is empirically tested in Section IV B, but it is a premise of the proposed search design rather than a proven universal property.
  • domain assumption The 16x16 max-pooling and 2.5 sigma threshold preserve enough signal information for detection.
    This preprocessing is adopted from prior work [32] and is not re-derived for long transients in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How effective is machine learning to detect long transient gravitational waves from neutron stars in a real search?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q7W7MDDN

@misc{pith2026190902262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How effective is machine learning to detect long transient gravitational waves from neutron stars in a real search?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q7W7MDDN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02262}
}
abstract

We present a comprehensive study of the effectiveness of Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) to detect long duration transient gravitational-wave signals lasting $O(hours-days)$ from isolated neutron stars. We determine that CNNs are robust towards signal morphologies that differ from the training set, and they do not require many training injections/data to guarantee good detection efficiency and low false alarm probability. In fact, we only need to train one CNN on signal/noise maps in a single 150 Hz band; afterwards, the CNN can distinguish signals/noise well in any band, though with different efficiencies and false alarm probabilities due to the non-stationary noise in LIGO/Virgo. We demonstrate that we can control the false alarm probability for the CNNs by selecting the optimal threshold on the outputs of the CNN, which appears to be frequency dependent. Finally we compare the detection efficiencies of the networks to a well-established algorithm, the Generalized FrequencyHough (GFH), which maps curves in the time/frequency plane to lines in a plane that relates to the initial frequency/spindown of the source. The networks have similar sensitivities to the GFH but are orders of magnitude faster to run and can detect signals to which the GFH is blind. Using the results of our analysis, we propose strategies to apply CNNs to a real search using LIGO/Virgo data to overcome the obstacles that we would encounter, such as a finite amount of training data. We then use our networks and strategies to run a real search for a remnant of GW170817, making this the first time ever that a machine learning method has been applied to search for a gravitational wave signal from an isolated neutron star.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02262 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Left: time/frequency map showing injected signal with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A CNN was trained on a variety of amplitudes in real [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. A CNN was trained on injections with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. We plot the false alarm probability as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. 1255 CNNs were trained on 38400 injections with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. We show sensitivity curves for an ANN, the GFH, a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Parameter space explored in our search for a remnant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Upper limits on distance reach at 50% confidence for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BinaryGFH-v2: Improved method to search for gravitational waves from sub-solar-mass, ultra-compact binaries using the Generalized Frequency-Hough Transform

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BinaryGFH-v2 is a modified GFH method that can search for inspiraling binaries with chirp masses 0.01–0.1 solar masses, validated in Gaussian noise and projected to constrain PBH dark matter.

  2. A Neural Network-Based Search for Unmodeled Transients in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Third Observing Run

    gr-qc 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Applying the GWAK autoencoder search to LIGO-Virgo O3 data recovers known compact binary mergers and glitches but finds no statistically significant unmodeled burst events.

  3. Applications of machine learning in gravitational wave research with current interferometric detectors

    gr-qc 2024-12 unverdicted

    A community review of machine learning in current gravitational-wave detectors, mapping where ML already works in production (noise subtraction, glitch classification, low-latency classification) and where traditional...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [19]

    Gwtc-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by ligo and virgo during the first and second observing runs

    Abbott, B., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R., Adya, V., Affeldt, C., et al. Gwtc-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by ligo and virgo during the first and second observing runs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12907 (2018)

    arXiv 2018

  2. [32]

    Binary neutron star mergers: a review of Einsteins richest laboratory

    Baiotti, L., and Rezzolla, L. Binary neutron star mergers: a review of Einsteins richest laboratory. Rept. Prog. Phys. 80, 9 (2017), 096901

    work page 2017

  3. [1]

    Load short fast Fourier transform Databases [14]

    work page

  4. [2]

    Choose appropriate FFT length depending on max- imum ˙f0, create complete time/frequency map and peakmap [12]

    work page

  5. [3]

    Clean known noise lines and persistent lines. 6 FIG. 3. A CNN was trained on injections with n = 7 and tested on 16000 (500 injections/amplitude) with fixed braking indices (left) and varying braking indices (right) in different frequency bands. The random variation in braking index is between δn/δt = [−10−4, 10−4]Hz/s. This variation over the observation t...

    work page 2000

  6. [4]

    Reduce resolution by a factor of 16 on each axis

    work page

  7. [5]

    Run CNNs on each reduced time/frequency map

    work page

  8. [6]

    Do coincidences between time/frequency maps that produce trig- gers

    Repeat for each detector’s data. Do coincidences between time/frequency maps that produce trig- gers

    work page

Show all 59 references
  1. [7]

    If a trigger remains after the coincidence step, run GFH on the peakmap and obtain parameters of the signal

  2. [8]

    using methodology described in [30]

    Perform coincidences between candidates returned by the GFH, follow-up, etc. using methodology described in [30]

  3. [9]

    shifting

    Repeat for each 150 Hz/2000 s map. We must emphasize that if a coincidence occurs be- tween time/frequency maps at the level of the CNNs, the GFH can estimate the parameters of a signal only if it follows a power-law behavior. Otherwise, we can only constrain that the variatio...

    2000

  4. [10]

    CNNs have comparable efficiencies to the GFH but with a larger false alarm probability depending on 9 FIG. 8. Upper limits on distance reach at 50% confidence for the search design presented in this paper, CNNs followed up by the GFH (magenta curve) and only CNNs trying to detect...

  5. [11]

    The CNNs are sensitive to time-varying brak- ing indices as well, even though these upper limits are done on fixed braking indices

    are shown. The CNNs are sensitive to time-varying brak- ing indices as well, even though these upper limits are done on fixed braking indices. Reasons why the GFH performed better in the first postmerger search include the use of a fixed n = 5, boosting sensitivity at low frequen...

    2000

  6. [12]

    CNNS are at least 5 orders of magnitudes faster than the GFH

  7. [13]

    CNNs can therefore be ap- plied quickly to new data in a low-latency way with- out discarding too much data

    Not much training data is necessary to achieve good detection efficiencies. CNNs can therefore be ap- plied quickly to new data in a low-latency way with- out discarding too much data

  8. [14]

    Training does not have to cover exhaustively the parameter space n=[2.5,7], f0=[20, 2000] Hz, but we must have an understanding of which value to place on pthr since the false alarm probability may vary in each band

    2000

  9. [15]

    It is therefore cru- cial to clean the time/frequency maps before giving them to the CNNs

    The CNNs are extremely sensitive to lines in the data, to the point where the CNNs will believe that every map that contains a line is a signal, implying a false alarm probability of one. It is therefore cru- cial to clean the time/frequency maps before giving them to the CNNs

  10. [16]

    This implies less time necessary for training and less hyperparameters to tune

    Complicated network architectures do not seem to be needed for this pattern recognition problem. This implies less time necessary for training and less hyperparameters to tune

  11. [17]

    Future work will include training on previous observing run’s data and testing on new data, in order to avoid using ensembles of CNNs

    The place of machine learning in long duration transient analysis is to provide triggers that can be followed up by the GFH, therefore a (not too high, around 1− 3%) false alarm probability is not a problem. Future work will include training on previous observing run’s data an...

  12. [18]

    Advanced ligo

    Aasi, J., Abbott, B., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R., et al. Advanced ligo. Classical and quantum gravity 32 , 7 (2015), 074001

    2015

  13. [20]

    All-sky search for con- 10 tinuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using advanced ligo o2 data

    Abbott, B., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R., Adya, V., Affeldt, C., et al. All-sky search for con- 10 tinuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using advanced ligo o2 data. Physical Review D 100 , 2 (2019), 024004

    2019

  14. [21]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Aber- nathy, M., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R., et al

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Aber- nathy, M., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R., et al. Ob- servation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Physical review letters 116 , 6 (2016), 061102

    2016

  15. [22]

    P., et al

    Abbott, B. P., et al. All-sky Search for Periodic Grav- itational Waves in the O1 LIGO Data. Phys. Rev. D96 , 6 (2017), 062002

    2017

  16. [23]

    P., et al

    Abbott, B. P., et al. Gw170817: Observation of grav- itational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (Oct 2017), 161101

    2017

  17. [24]

    P., et al

    Abbott, B. P., et al. Search for gravitational waves from a long-lived remnant of the binary neutron star merger GW170817. The Astrophysical Journal 875 , 2 (apr 2019), 160

    2019

  18. [25]

    Ad- vanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravi- tational wave detector

    Acernese, F., Agathos, M., Agatsuma, K., Aisa, D., Allemandou, N., Allocca, A., Amarni, J., As- tone, P., Balestri, G., Ballardin, G., et al. Ad- vanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravi- tational wave detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity 32, 2 (2014), 024001

    2014

  19. [26]

    G., and Schwenzer, K

    Alford, M. G., and Schwenzer, K. Gravita- tional wave emission from oscillating millisecond pulsars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 446 , 4 (2014), 3631–3641

    2014

  20. [27]

    A high braking index for a pulsar

    Archibald, R., Gotthelf, E., Ferdman, R., Kaspi, V., Guillot, S., Harrison, F., Keane, E., Pivo- varoff, M., Stern, D., Tendulkar, S., et al. A high braking index for a pulsar. The Astrophysical Jour- nal Letters 819 , 1 (2016), L16

    2016

  21. [28]

    New method to observe gravitational waves emitted by core collapse supernovae

    Astone, P., Cerd´a-Dur´an, P., Di Palma, I., Drago, M., Muciaccia, F., Palomba, C., and Ricci, F. New method to observe gravitational waves emitted by core collapse supernovae. Physical Review D 98 , 12 (2018), 122002

    2018

  22. [29]

    Method for all-sky searches of con- tinuous gravitational wave signals using the frequency- Hough transform

    Astone, P., Colla, A., D’Antonio, S., Frasca, S., and Palomba, C. Method for all-sky searches of con- tinuous gravitational wave signals using the frequency- Hough transform. Phys. Rev. D90 , 4 (2014), 042002

    2014

  23. [30]

    Codes to create sfdbs and o2 used time segments

    Astone, P., et al. Codes to create sfdbs and o2 used time segments. Tech. Rep. LIGO-T1900140, 2019

    2019

  24. [31]

    The short fft database and the peak map for the hierarchical search of periodic sources

    Astone, P., Frasca, S., and Palomba, C. The short fft database and the peak map for the hierarchical search of periodic sources. Classical and Quantum Gravity 22 , 18 (2005), S1197

    2005

  25. [33]

    Measuring neutron- star properties via gravitational waves from neutron-star mergers

    Bauswein, A., and Janka, H.-T. Measuring neutron- star properties via gravitational waves from neutron-star mergers. Physical review letters 108 , 1 (2012), 011101

    2012

  26. [34]

    The braking index of a radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsar

    Clark, C., Pletsch, H., Wu, J., Guillemot, L., Camilo, F., Johnson, T., Kerr, M., Allen, B., Aulbert, C., Beer, C., et al. The braking index of a radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsar. The Astrophysical journal letters 832, 1 (2016), L15

    2016

  27. [35]

    Identification and mitigation of nar- row spectral artifacts that degrade searches for persistent gravitational waves in the first two observing runs of Ad- vanced LIGO

    Covas, P., et al. Identification and mitigation of nar- row spectral artifacts that degrade searches for persistent gravitational waves in the first two observing runs of Ad- vanced LIGO. Phys. Rev. D97 , 8 (2018), 082002

    2018

  28. [36]

    Deep-learning continuous grav- itational waves

    Dreissigacker, C., Sharma, R., Messenger, C., Zhao, R., and Prix, R. Deep-learning continuous grav- itational waves. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.13291 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    et al., B. A. All-sky search for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using advanced ligo o2 data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.01901 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Matching matched filtering with deep networks for gravitational-wave astronomy

    Gabbard, H., Williams, M., Hayes, F., and Messen- ger, C. Matching matched filtering with deep networks for gravitational-wave astronomy. Physical review letters 120, 14 (2018), 141103

    2018

  31. [39]

    D., Kilbertus, N., Harry, I., and Sch¨olkopf, B

    Gebhard, T. D., Kilbertus, N., Harry, I., and Sch¨olkopf, B. Convolutional neural networks: a magic bullet for gravitational-wave detection? arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08693 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Deep learning for real- time gravitational wave detection and parameter estima- tion: Results with advanced ligo data

    George, D., and Huerta, E. Deep learning for real- time gravitational wave detection and parameter estima- tion: Results with advanced ligo data. Physics Letters B 778 (2018), 64–70

    2018

  33. [41]

    Deep neural networks to enable real-time multimessenger astrophysics

    George, D., and Huerta, E. Deep neural networks to enable real-time multimessenger astrophysics. Physical Review D 97 , 4 (2018), 044039

    2018

  34. [42]

    Segments used for creat- ing standard sfts in o2 data.Tech

    Goetz, E., and LSC/Virgo . Segments used for creat- ing standard sfts in o2 data.Tech. Rep. LIGO-T1900085

  35. [43]

    R., Urbanec, M., and Urban- cova, G

    Hamil, O., Stone, J. R., Urbanec, M., and Urban- cova, G. Braking index of isolated pulsars. Physical Review D 91 , 6 (2015), 063007

    2015

  36. [44]

    Jaranowski, P., Kr ´olak, A., and Schutz, B. F. Data analysis of gravitational-wave signals from spinning neutron stars: The signal and its detection. Phys. Rev. D58 (1998), 063001

    1998

  37. [45]

    G., Palfrey- man, J., Stappers, B., and Weltevrede, P

    Keitel, D., Woan, G., Pitkin, M., Schumacher, C., Pearlstone, B., Riles, K., Lyne, A. G., Palfrey- man, J., Stappers, B., and Weltevrede, P. First search for long-duration transient gravitational waves af- ter glitches in the vela and crab pulsars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04...

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D., Leris, C., Rowlinson, A., and Glampedakis, K

    Lasky, P. D., Leris, C., Rowlinson, A., and Glampedakis, K. The braking index of millisecond mag- netars. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 843 , 1 (2017), L1

    2017

  39. [47]

    J., Singhal, A., and Whiting, B

    Miller, A., Astone, P., D’Antonio, S., Frasca, S., Intini, G., La Rosa, I., Leaci, P., Mastrogio- vanni, S., Muciaccia, F., Palomba, C., Piccinni, O. J., Singhal, A., and Whiting, B. F. Method to search for long duration gravitational wave tran- sients from isolated neutron st...

    2018

  40. [48]

    Using deep convolutional neural net- works to build a low-latency classifier to trigger the de- tection of long gravitational wave transients

    Muciaccia, F. Using deep convolutional neural net- works to build a low-latency classifier to trigger the de- tection of long gravitational wave transients

  41. [49]

    A., Panagopoulos, O

    Mytidis, A., Panagopoulos, A. A., Panagopoulos, O. P., Miller, A., and Whiting, B. Sensitivity study using machine learning algorithms on simulated r-mode gravitational wave signals from newborn neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D 99 (Jan 2019), 024024

    2019

  42. [50]

    Oliver, M., Keitel, D., and Sintes, A. M. Adaptive transient hough method for long-duration gravitational wave transients.Physical Review D 99, 10 (2019), 104067

    2019

  43. [51]

    J., Lindblom, L., Cutler, C., Schutz, B

    Owen, B. J., Lindblom, L., Cutler, C., Schutz, B. F., Vecchio, A., and Andersson, N. Gravita- tional waves from hot young rapidly rotating neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D58 (1998), 084020

    1998

  44. [52]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity 36 , 1 (2018), 015008

    Piccinni, O., Astone, P., DAntonio, S., Frasca, S., Intini, G., Leaci, P., Mastrogiovanni, S., Miller, 11 A., Palomba, C., and Singhal, A.A new data analysis framework for the search of continuous gravitational wave signals. Classical and Quantum Gravity 36 , 1 (2018), 015008

    2018

  45. [53]

    Search method for long-duration gravitational-wave transients from neutron stars

    Prix, R., Giampanis, S., and Messenger, C. Search method for long-duration gravitational-wave transients from neutron stars. Physical Review D 84 , 2 (2011), 023007

    2011

  46. [54]

    Recent searches for continuous gravitational waves

    Riles, K. Recent searches for continuous gravitational waves. Modern Physics Letters A 32, 39 (2017), 1730035

    2017

  47. [55]

    D., Sammut, L., and Ashton, G

    Sarin, N., Lasky, P. D., Sammut, L., and Ashton, G. X-ray guided gravitational-wave search for binary neutron star merger remnants. Physical Review D 98 , 4 (2018), 043011

    2018

  48. [56]

    L., and Teukolsky, S

    Shapiro, S. L., and Teukolsky, S. A. Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects. Wiley, New York, 1983

    1983

  49. [57]

    Application of hidden markov model tracking to the search for long-duration transient gravitational waves from the remnant of the bi- nary neutron star merger gw170817

    Sun, L., and Melatos, A. Application of hidden markov model tracking to the search for long-duration transient gravitational waves from the remnant of the bi- nary neutron star merger gw170817. Physical Review D 99, 12 (2019), 123003

    2019

  50. [58]

    Long gravitational-wave transients and associated detection strategies for a network of ter- restrial interferometers

    Thrane, E., et al. Long gravitational-wave transients and associated detection strategies for a network of ter- restrial interferometers. Phys. Rev. D83 (2011), 083004

    2011

  51. [59]

    De- tecting very long-lived gravitational-wave transients last- ing hours to weeks

    Thrane, E., Mandic, V., and Christensen, N. De- tecting very long-lived gravitational-wave transients last- ing hours to weeks. Physical Review D 91 , 10 (2015), 104021

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.