Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Universal Sound Diffusion in a Strongly Interacting Fermi Gas

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a strongly interacting Fermi gas, sound diffusivity stops at the quantum limit $\hbar/m$ and remains flat across the superfluid transition.

desk verdict A careful, first-of-its-kind measurement of sound diffusivity in a homogeneous unitary Fermi gas, with a robust normal-state result and a believable quantum-limited plateau, though the superfluid extraction leans on a single-Lorentzian fit that deserves a hard look. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02555 v2 pith:M3QNNOGR submitted 2019-09-05 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Parth B. Patel , Zhenjie Yan , Biswaroop Mukherjee , Richard J. Fletcher , Julian Struck , Martin W. Zwierlein This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords unitaryFermigassounddiffusivityquantumlimitedtransportdensityresponsefunctionhydrodynamicdampingsuperfluidtransitionscaleinvarianceopticalboxtrap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first direct measurement of sound diffusivity in a homogeneous, strongly interacting Fermi gas of atoms tuned to a Feshbach resonance (the unitary Fermi gas), using sound waves generated and detected in an optical box trap. It aims to establish that, as temperature is lowered in the normal state, the sound diffusivity $D$ decreases monotonically instead of diverging as $1/T^2$ like in weakly interacting Fermi liquids. At the superfluid transition, the paper claims $D$ reaches a universal value close to $\hbar/m$, the Heisenberg limit set by Planck's constant and particle mass, and stays essentially flat as the condensate fraction grows. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a clean experimental benchmark for transport theories of strongly interacting fermions that also describe neutron matter, hydrodynamic electron flow, and the quark-gluon plasma.

What carries the argument

The central object is the density response function $\chi(\omega,k)$, whose poles locate sound modes and whose imaginary part, measured via the out-of-phase density modulation, gives the sound attenuation rate $\Gamma$. The hydrodynamic relation $\Gamma = D k^2 f(c k/\Gamma_{\rm ph})$ with $f(x)=\tan^{-1}(x)/x$ connects the measured linewidth to the sound diffusivity $D$, with a phonon damping rate $\Gamma_{\rm ph}$ accounting for the crossover to collisionless damping at higher wavenumbers. Below the superfluid transition, two-fluid hydrodynamics is assumed to separate first-sound from second-sound peaks, and the first-sound sum rule $W_1 = n\pi/(2mc^2)$ calibrates the drive amplitude.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the shear viscosity $\eta$ and thermal conductivity $\kappa$ in the same homogeneous gas would settle the central claim: if $4\eta/(3mn) + 4\kappa T/(15P)$ differs from the reported $D$ by more than the combined uncertainties, the inferred sound diffusivity is not the hydrodynamic one. Alternatively, repeating the linewidth measurement at wavenumbers below $k \simeq 0.05\,mc/\hbar$ would show whether $\Gamma/k^2$ remains $k$-independent; a residual $k$-dependence would indicate contamination by second sound or collisionless damping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the sound diffusivity of the unitary Fermi gas is quantum limited. Measuring the density response function $\operatorname{Im}\chi(\omega,k)$ through steady-state response to a modulated optical wall, the authors resolve first-sound resonances at the normal-mode wavenumbers of the box, whose Lorentzian linewidth gives the damping rate $\Gamma$. At low wavenumbers $\Gamma = D k^2$, establishing diffusive sound attenuation, and the extracted $D$ falls smoothly from the high-temperature $T^{3/2}$ behaviour to a plateau near $\hbar/m$ below the superfluid transition. The same data set confirms scale invariance through the relation $m c^2 = \frac{10}{9} E/N$, and combined with a computed shear viscosity implies a Prandtl number strictly below unity at all temperatures, which excludes a relativistic conformal gravity dual for this system.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis below the superfluid transition assumes that the measured first-sound linewidth is governed by two-fluid hydrodynamics with a clean separation from second sound, and that the linewidth at low wavenumbers obeys $\Gamma = D k^2 f(ck/\Gamma_{\rm ph})$ with a fitted phonon damping rate; if second-sound contamination or beyond-hydrodynamic relaxation biases those linewidths, the inferred $D$ would not be the true sound diffusivity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the normal state, $D$ decreasing as $T$ falls rules out the $1/T^2$ Fermi-liquid divergence for a unitary Fermi gas in the explored range, sharpening the contrast with liquid $^3$He.
  • Below $T_c$, $D \simeq \hbar/m$ independent of temperature and condensate fraction means sound attenuation in strongly interacting fermionic superfluids is fixed by $h$ and $m$ alone, matching the behaviour of liquid $^4$He.
  • A Prandtl number below one for all temperatures implies that momentum diffusion dominates heat diffusion, a constraint on any kinetic-theory or holographic description of the unitary Fermi gas.
  • Because scale invariance makes $D$ a universal function of $T/T_F$, the measured values transfer directly to other unitary Fermi systems regardless of density or species.
  • The measured $D$ constrains the sum $4\eta/(3mn) + 4\kappa T/(15P)$, so any proposed shear viscosity and thermal conductivity must satisfy this combination.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the plateau at $\hbar/m$ persists to arbitrarily low temperature, then the kinematic viscosity of the unitary Fermi gas cannot diverge as phonon damping would suggest, which would rule out one class of low-temperature transport scenarios.
  • The same box-trap response method could measure the spin diffusivity or a direct thermal conductivity in the same homogeneous geometry, providing an independent check of the decomposition $D = D_\eta + D_\kappa$.
  • A natural testable extension is to push to lower $T/T_F$: if a small Fermi-liquid-like rise in $D$ appears at the lowest temperatures, the universal plateau would be a crossover feature rather than an exact fixed point.
  • For neutron matter, where the same unitary limit approximately applies, a sound diffusivity near $\hbar/m$ sets a floor on dissipative heating in neutron star mergers, with observable consequences for gravitational wave damping.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports measurements of sound propagation and attenuation in a homogeneous unitary Fermi gas confined in an optical box trap. By modulating an endcap wall and imaging the resulting density waves, the authors measure the dispersion relation ω(k), the speed of sound c, and the damping rate Γ of the density response. They find a linear dispersion with a scale-invariant speed of sound satisfying mc² = (10/9)E/N with no free parameters. From the damping rate they extract the sound diffusivity D = Γ/k². In the normal state, D decreases monotonically with decreasing temperature, approaching a value near ℏ/m, in contrast to the diverging 1/T² behavior of weakly interacting Fermi liquids. Upon crossing the superfluid transition, D is reported to be approximately temperature-independent and close to ℏ/m, independent of condensate fraction. The paper also derives constraints on the thermal conductivity and Prandtl number, finding Pr < 1 at all temperatures, and discusses implications for strongly interacting fermionic matter in other contexts.

Significance. If the results hold, they provide the first direct measurement of sound diffusivity in a homogeneous strongly interacting Fermi gas, establishing a quantum-limited value D ∼ ℏ/m that is universal across the superfluid transition. The clean homogeneous geometry, the parameter-free check of scale invariance through mc² = (10/9)E/N, and the high-temperature prediction D = 6.46(ℏ/m)(T/T_F)^{3/2} are notable strengths. The findings directly constrain shear viscosity and thermal conductivity and sharpen the comparison with other quantum fluids such as 4He, 3He, and strongly correlated systems in nuclear and particle physics. The experimental method is careful, and the paper is clearly written. However, the central superfluid claim rests on a linewidth extraction whose robustness against two-fluid (second-sound) contamination is not quantitatively demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fig. 3B, Fig. 4, Supplementary Information 'The response function χ and its normalization'] The central superfluid claim—D ≈ ℏ/m independent of temperature and condensate fraction—rests on the extraction of the first-sound linewidth Γ from single-Lorentzian fits below Tc. The SI itself states that below Tc the full two-fluid response Im[χ(ω,k)]/ω contains a second, finite-frequency peak (second sound) in addition to the first-sound peak. The first-sound sum-rule check W1(k) in Fig. 6B conserves the integrated weight of the first-sound peak; it does not certify that the fitted Lorentzian width is unbiased by a second-sound tail that is small in the integral but non-negligible near the resonance. Because the plateau from n_C = 0 to n_C ≈ 0.8 is the headline result, I ask the authors to demonstrate explicitly that the single-Lorentzian width is not biased: either fit the full two-fluid response of Refs. [47,48,64] or quantify the second-sound contribution to the linewidth at the wave numbers used. Without this, the temperature independence below Tc could be an artifact of the fitting model.
  2. [Fig. 3B and the model Γ = D k² f(ck/Γ_ph)] The below-Tc analysis uses Γ = D k² f(ck/Γ_ph) with f(x) = tan⁻¹(x)/x and a single fitted phonon damping rate Γ_ph = 0.27(8) k_BT/ℏ. The fitted Γ_ph absorbs the crossover from quadratic to linear scaling, and the extracted D may therefore inherit the model's assumption that one relaxation channel governs sound attenuation. The authors should state explicitly whether the D values in Fig. 4 are obtained from a direct low-k quadratic fit to Γ(k) or from the f-model, and should justify the applicability of this single-relaxation-time expression to the unitary Fermi gas by comparing it with the two-fluid hydrodynamic form. This distinction matters for the systematic uncertainty on D below Tc.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, paragraph after Fig. 3B] The sentence 'Fermi's Golden Rule yields a rate Γ_ph ∝ k' appears to conflict with the fitted constant Γ_ph = 0.27(8) k_BT/ℏ; please clarify whether Γ_ph is momentum-dependent and how the argument of f(x) is defined in that case.
  2. [Supplementary Information, 'Thermal conductivity and Prandtl number'] The relation c_P = 5Pα/(2ρ) is used to reduce the sound diffusivity to D = 4η/(3ρ) + 4κT/(15P), but the derivation is not shown; a one-line derivation would help the reader verify the formula.
  3. [Fig. 3B caption] The caption lists red circles, green squares, and blue triangles for T/T_F = 0.36(5), 0.21(3), and 0.13(2), respectively, but the text refers to 'red and green' above Tc and 'blue' below; consider adding a legend to the figure itself to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [References] Reference [34] appears to have an incomplete author list; please verify against the published version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sound diffusivity is measured from observed resonance widths, not derived from its inputs.

full rationale

The central claim is an experimental measurement rather than a derived prediction: D is extracted from the full width at half maximum of Lorentzian fits to the measured density response Im[chi(omega,k)] and divided by k^2, so no fitted parameter defining the final D values is pre-supposed by the result. The normal-state quadratic scaling Gamma proportional to k^2 is read directly from the data; the high-temperature prediction D = 6.46 (hbar/m)(T/T_F)^{3/2} uses independently published viscosity and thermal conductivity results with no free parameters; and the mc^2 = (10/9) E/N check is a consistency test of scale invariance using independently measured energy per particle. Below T_c, the extraction uses the Pethick--ter Haar model Gamma = D k^2 f(ck/Gamma_ph) with Gamma_ph fitted to the data, which is a stated modeling assumption rather than a definition of D by construction; it creates model dependence but not circularity. Self-citations to the group's equation of state, box trap, and condensate-fraction thermometer serve as inputs with independent published support and are not invoked as uniqueness arguments or as the source of the predicted universal value. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurements require standard hydrodynamics and two-fluid response theory, plus calibration inputs from the group's own earlier equation of state and box trap. The only numbers fitted to data that enter the interpretive model are the phonon damping rate Gamma_ph and the drive wall widths sigma; neither determines the low-k sound diffusivity. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Gamma_ph (phonon damping rate) = 0.27(8) k_B T/hbar
    Fit parameter in the model Gamma = D k^2 atan(ck/Gamma_ph)/(ck/Gamma_ph) (ref [53]) used to describe the crossover from quadratic to linear damping below Tc; it does not enter the low-k D values.
  • Endcap wall width sigma for even and odd modes = 4.4(1) um and 3.2 um
    Gaussian widths fitted to the first-sound peak integrals I1(k) to model the drive potential V0(k); used to calibrate the response amplitude, not the linewidth.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The unitary Fermi gas is scale invariant, giving zero bulk viscosity and D = 4eta/(3rho) + 4kappa T/(15P).
    Established for unitarity-limited interactions; verified in this paper via mc^2 = (10/9)E/N (Fig. 1C).
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic relation Gamma = D k^2 for sound attenuation in the low-k limit.
    Standard Landau-Khalatnikov hydrodynamics; invoked and used to extract D from linewidths.
  • domain assumption Two-fluid hydrodynamic separation of first and second sound below Tc.
    Used to fit the first-sound resonance linewidths without contamination from second-sound modes; based on refs [47,48,64].
  • domain assumption Temperature and density calibration via the measured equation of state of ref [18].
    Thermometry and determination of T/T_F and condensate fraction rely on the MIT EOS measurement.
  • domain assumption Theoretical shear viscosity from ref [21] used to convert D into thermal conductivity and Prandtl number.
    Derivation of kappa and Pr uses the calculated eta of Enss et al.; the Pr<1 exclusion of holographic duals inherits this theory's uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Sound Diffusion in a Strongly Interacting Fermi Gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M3QNNOGR

@misc{pith2026190902555,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Sound Diffusion in a Strongly Interacting Fermi Gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M3QNNOGR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02555}
}
abstract

Transport of strongly interacting fermions governs modern materials -- from the high-$T_c$ cuprates to bilayer graphene --, but also nuclear fission, the merging of neutron stars and the expansion of the early universe. Here we observe a universal quantum limit of diffusivity in a homogeneous, strongly interacting Fermi gas of atoms by studying sound propagation and its attenuation via the coupled transport of momentum and heat. In the normal state, the sound diffusivity ${D}$ monotonically decreases upon lowering the temperature $T$, in contrast to the diverging behavior of weakly interacting Fermi liquids. As the superfluid transition temperature is crossed, ${D}$ attains a universal value set by the ratio of Planck's constant ${h}$ and the particle mass ${m}$. This finding of quantum limited sound diffusivity informs theories of fermion transport, with relevance for hydrodynamic flow of electrons, neutrons and quarks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02555 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Few is different: deciphering many-body dynamics in mesoscopic quantum gases

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A workshop report mapping the size, equilibrium, and interaction frontiers of hydrodynamic behavior in mesoscopic quantum systems, connecting few-atom Fermi gases and high-energy small collision systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Doping a mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductiv- ity,

    Patrick A. Lee, Naoto Nagaosa, and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Doping a mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductiv- ity,” Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17–85 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    Un- conventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene super- lattices,

    Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Un- conventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene super- lattices,” Nature556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Viscous dissipation and heat conduction in binary neutron-star mergers,

    Mark G. Alford, Luke Bovard, Matthias Hanauske, Luciano Rezzolla, and Kai Schwenzer, “Viscous dissipation and heat conduction in binary neutron-star mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 041101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Strongly correlated quantum fluids: ultracold quantum gases, quantum chromodynamic plasmas and holographic duality,

    Allan Adams, Lincoln D Carr, Thomas Sch ¨afer, Peter Stein- berg, and John E Thomas, “Strongly correlated quantum fluids: ultracold quantum gases, quantum chromodynamic plasmas and holographic duality,” New Journal of Physics 14, 115009 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Universal spin transport in a strongly interacting Fermi gas,

    Ariel Sommer, Mark Ku, Giacomo Roati, and Martin W. Zwierlein, “Universal spin transport in a strongly interacting Fermi gas,” Nature472, 201–204 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    H Bennemann and J

    K. H Bennemann and J. B Ketterson, The physics of liquid and solid helium (Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY , 1976)

    work page 1976

  7. [7]

    Dieter V ollhardt and Peter W¨olfle, The superfluid phases of he- lium 3 (Dover Publications, Inc., 2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Viscosity of liquid 4He and quantum of circulation: Are they related?

    Victor S. L’vov, Ladislav Skrbek, and Katepalli R. Sreenivasan, “Viscosity of liquid 4He and quantum of circulation: Are they related?” Physics of Fluids 26, 041703 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Making, probing and un- derstanding ultracold Fermi gases,

    Ketterle W. and Zwierlein M. W., “Making, probing and un- derstanding ultracold Fermi gases,” Proceedings of the Interna- tional School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” 164, 95–287 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    Many-body physics with ultracold gases,

    Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zwerger, “Many-body physics with ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885–964 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    The- ory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases,

    Stefano Giorgini, Lev P. Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari, “The- ory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215–1274 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Wilhelm Zwerger, ed., The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Superfluidity in ultracold atomic Fermi gases,

    Martin W. Zwierlein, “Superfluidity in ultracold atomic Fermi gases,” in Novel Superfluids (Oxford University Press, 2014) pp. 269–422

    2014

  6. [14]

    Observation of a strongly interacting degenerate Fermi gas of atoms,

    K. M O’Hara, S. L. Hemmer, M. E. Gehm, S. R. Granade, and J. E. Thomas, “Observation of a strongly interacting degenerate Fermi gas of atoms,” Science298, 2179–2182 (2002)

    2002

  7. [15]

    Precision measurements of collective oscillations in the BEC- BCS crossover,

    A. Altmeyer, S. Riedl, C. Kohstall, M. J. Wright, R. Geursen, M. Bartenstein, C. Chin, J. Hecker Denschlag, and R. Grimm, “Precision measurements of collective oscillations in the BEC- BCS crossover,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 040401 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Collec- tive modes in a unitary Fermi gas across the superfluid phase 6 transition,

    Meng Khoon Tey, Leonid A. Sidorenkov, Edmundo R. S´anchez Guajardo, Rudolf Grimm, Mark J. H. Ku, Martin W. Zwierlein, Yan-Hua Hou, Lev Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari, “Collec- tive modes in a unitary Fermi gas across the superfluid phase 6 transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 05...

    2013

  9. [17]

    Universal thermodynamics of degenerate quan- tum gases in the unitarity limit,

    Tin-Lun Ho, “Universal thermodynamics of degenerate quan- tum gases in the unitarity limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 090402 (2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    Revealing the superfluid lambda transition in the univer- sal thermodynamics of a unitary Fermi gas,

    M. J. H. Ku, A. T. Sommer, L. W. Cheuk, and M. W. Zwier- lein, “Revealing the superfluid lambda transition in the univer- sal thermodynamics of a unitary Fermi gas,” Science335, 563– 567 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Crossover from Bardeen- Cooper-Schrieffer to Bose-Einstein condensation and the uni- tary Fermi gas,

    Mohit Randeria and Edward Taylor, “Crossover from Bardeen- Cooper-Schrieffer to Bose-Einstein condensation and the uni- tary Fermi gas,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 5, 209–232 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Universal quantum viscosity in a unitary Fermi gas,

    C. Cao, E. Elliott, J. Joseph, H. Wu, J. Petricka, T. Sch¨afer, and J. E. Thomas, “Universal quantum viscosity in a unitary Fermi gas,” Science331, 58–61 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Vis- cosity and scale invariance in the unitary Fermi gas,

    Tilman Enss, Rudolf Haussmann, and Wilhelm Zwerger, “Vis- cosity and scale invariance in the unitary Fermi gas,” Annals of Physics 326, 770–796 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Shear viscosity of a unitary Fermi gas near the superfluid phase transition,

    J. A. Joseph, E. Elliott, and J. E. Thomas, “Shear viscosity of a unitary Fermi gas near the superfluid phase transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020401 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Thermal con- ductivity and sound attenuation in dilute atomic Fermi gases,

    Matt Braby, Jingyi Chao, and Thomas Sch ¨afer, “Thermal con- ductivity and sound attenuation in dilute atomic Fermi gases,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 033619 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    Renormalization-group fixed points, universal phase diagram, and 1/n expansion for quantum liquids with interactions near the unitarity limit,

    Predrag Nikoli ´c and Subir Sachdev, “Renormalization-group fixed points, universal phase diagram, and 1/n expansion for quantum liquids with interactions near the unitarity limit,” Phys. Rev. A 75, 033608 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Quantum critical transport in the unitary Fermi gas,

    Tilman Enss, “Quantum critical transport in the unitary Fermi gas,” Phys. Rev. A86, 013616 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Fermi-liquid behavior of the normal phase of a strongly interacting gas of cold atoms,

    S. Nascimb `ene, N. Navon, S. Pilati, F. Chevy, S. Giorgini, A. Georges, and C. Salomon, “Fermi-liquid behavior of the normal phase of a strongly interacting gas of cold atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 215303 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Symmetry obstruc- tion to Fermi liquid behavior in the unitary limit,

    Ira Z. Rothstein and Prashant Shrivastava, “Symmetry obstruc- tion to Fermi liquid behavior in the unitary limit,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 035101 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Henrik Smith and Henning Højgaard Jensen, Transport phe- nomena (Clarendon, 1989)

    1989

  21. [29]

    The viscosity of liquid helium 3,

    M. A. Black, H. E. Hall, and K. Thompson, “The viscosity of liquid helium 3,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 4, 129–142 (1971)

    1971

  22. [30]

    Viscosity measurements in superfluid 3he-b from 2 to 29 bar,

    C. N. Archie, T. A. Alvesalo, J. D. Reppy, and R. C. Richard- son, “Viscosity measurements in superfluid 3he-b from 2 to 29 bar,” Journal of Low Temperature Physics42, 295–332 (1981)

    1981

  23. [31]

    Per- fect fluids and bad metals: insights from ultracold Fermi gases,

    Hao Guo, Dan Wulin, Chih-Chun Chien, and K Levin, “Per- fect fluids and bad metals: insights from ultracold Fermi gases,” New Journal of Physics 13, 075011 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Three-phonon and four-phonon interaction processes in a pair-condensed Fermi gas,

    H. Kurkjian, Y . Castin, and A. Sinatra, “Three-phonon and four-phonon interaction processes in a pair-condensed Fermi gas,” Annalen der Physik529, 1600352 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Two-terminal transport measurements with cold atoms,

    Sebastian Krinner, Tilman Esslinger, and Jean-Philippe Bran- tut, “Two-terminal transport measurements with cold atoms,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 343003 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Josephson effect in fermionic superfluids across the BEC-BCS crossover,

    G. Valtolina, A. Burchianti, A. Amico, E. Neri, K. Xhani, J. A. Seman, A. Trombettoni, A. Smerzi, M. Zaccanti, M. Inguscio, and G. Roati, “Josephson effect in fermionic superfluids across the BEC-BCS crossover,” Science350, 1505–1508 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Collective excitations of a degenerate gas at the BEC-BCS crossover,

    M. Bartenstein, A. Altmeyer, S. Riedl, S. Jochim, C. Chin, J. Hecker Denschlag, and R. Grimm, “Collective excitations of a degenerate gas at the BEC-BCS crossover,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 203201 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Evidence for superfluidity in a resonantly interacting Fermi gas,

    J. Kinast, S. L. Hemmer, M. E. Gehm, A. Turlapov, and J. E. Thomas, “Evidence for superfluidity in a resonantly interacting Fermi gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 150402 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Goldstone mode and pair-breaking excitations in atomic fermi superfluids,

    Sascha Hoinka, Paul Dyke, Marcus G. Lingham, Jami J. Kin- nunen, Georg M. Bruun, and Chris J. Vale, “Goldstone mode and pair-breaking excitations in atomic fermi superfluids,” Na- ture Physics 13, 943–946 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Universal spin dynamics in two-dimensional Fermi gases,

    Marco Koschorreck, Daniel Pertot, Enrico V ogt, and Michael K¨ohl, “Universal spin dynamics in two-dimensional Fermi gases,” Nature Physics9, 405–409 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Observation of quantum-limited spin transport in strongly interacting two- dimensional Fermi gases,

    C. Luciuk, S. Smale, F. B ¨ottcher, H. Sharum, B. A. Olsen, S. Trotzky, T. Enss, and J. H. Thywissen, “Observation of quantum-limited spin transport in strongly interacting two- dimensional Fermi gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 130405 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Bose-Einstein con- densation of atoms in a uniform potential,

    Alexander L. Gaunt, Tobias F. Schmidutz, Igor Gotlibovych, Robert P. Smith, and Zoran Hadzibabic, “Bose-Einstein con- densation of atoms in a uniform potential,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 200406 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Homogeneous atomic Fermi gases,

    Biswaroop Mukherjee, Zhenjie Yan, Parth B. Patel, Zoran Hadzibabic, Tarik Yefsah, Julian Struck, and Martin W. Zwier- lein, “Homogeneous atomic Fermi gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 123401 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Two-dimensional ho- mogeneous Fermi gases,

    Klaus Hueck, Niclas Luick, Lennart Sobirey, Jonas Siegl, Thomas Lompe, and Henning Moritz, “Two-dimensional ho- mogeneous Fermi gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 060402 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Mea- suring the hydrodynamic linear response of a unitary Fermi gas,

    Lorin Baird, Xin Wang, Stetson Roof, and J. E. Thomas, “Mea- suring the hydrodynamic linear response of a unitary Fermi gas,” (2019), arXiv:1906.11179

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Emergence of a turbulent cascade in a quantum gas,

    Nir Navon, Alexander L. Gaunt, Robert P. Smith, and Zoran Hadzibabic, “Emergence of a turbulent cascade in a quantum gas,” Nature539, 72–75 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Sound propaga- tion in a uniform superfluid two-dimensional Bose gas,

    J. L. Ville, R. Saint-Jalm, ´E. Le Cerf, M. Aidelsburger, S. Nascimb`ene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, “Sound propaga- tion in a uniform superfluid two-dimensional Bose gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 145301 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    From single-particle excitations to sound waves in a box-trapped atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,

    Samuel J. Garratt, Christoph Eigen, Jinyi Zhang, Patrik Turz´ak, Raphael Lopes, Robert P. Smith, Zoran Hadzibabic, and Nir Navon, “From single-particle excitations to sound waves in a box-trapped atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 021601 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Microscopic theory of su- perfluid helium,

    P. C. Hohenberg and P. C. Martin, “Microscopic theory of su- perfluid helium,” Annals of Physics 34, 291–359 (1965)

    1965

  40. [48]

    Density correlation function in superfluid he- lium near Tλ,

    P. C. Hohenberg, “Density correlation function in superfluid he- lium near Tλ,” Journal of Low Temperature Physics 11, 745– 750 (1973)

    1973

  41. [49]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid mechanics (Elsevier, 1959)

    1959

  42. [50]

    Measurements of the dynamic structure factor near the lambda temperature in liquid helium,

    J. A. Tarvin, F. Vidal, and T. J. Greytak, “Measurements of the dynamic structure factor near the lambda temperature in liquid helium,” Phys. Rev. B15, 4193–4210 (1977)

    1977

  43. [51]

    Concavity of the collective excitation branch of a Fermi gas in the bec-bcs crossover,

    H. Kurkjian, Y . Castin, and A. Sinatra, “Concavity of the collective excitation branch of a Fermi gas in the bec-bcs crossover,” Phys. Rev. A93, 013623 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Boiling a unitary Fermi liquid,

    Zhenjie Yan, Parth B. Patel, Biswaroop Mukherjee, Richard J. Fletcher, Julian Struck, and Martin W. Zwierlein, “Boiling a unitary Fermi liquid,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 093401 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    On the attenuation of sound in liquid helium,

    C. J. Pethick and D. Ter Haar, “On the attenuation of sound in liquid helium,” Physica32, 1905–1920 (1966)

    1966

  46. [54]

    Finite- temperature collective dynamics of a Fermi gas in the bec-bcs crossover,

    M. J. Wright, S. Riedl, A. Altmeyer, C. Kohstall, E. R. S´anchez Guajardo, J. Hecker Denschlag, and R. Grimm, “Finite- temperature collective dynamics of a Fermi gas in the bec-bcs crossover,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 150403 (2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    First-sound attenuation and viscosity of super- fluid 3He-B,

    G. Eska, K. Neumaier, W. Schoepe, K. Uhlig, W. Wiedemann, and P. W¨olfle, “First-sound attenuation and viscosity of super- fluid 3He-B,” Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 1337–1340 (1980)

    1980

  48. [56]

    Vanishing bulk viscosities and conformal invariance 7 of the unitary Fermi gas,

    D. T. Son, “Vanishing bulk viscosities and conformal invariance 7 of the unitary Fermi gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 020604 (2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    Viscosity and thermal relaxation for a resonantly interacting fermi gas,

    G. M. Bruun and H. Smith, “Viscosity and thermal relaxation for a resonantly interacting fermi gas,” Phys. Rev. A72, 043605 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    Transport pro- cesses in superfluid 3He−b at low temperatures,

    C. J. Pethick, H. Smith, and P. Bhattacharyya, “Transport pro- cesses in superfluid 3He−b at low temperatures,” Phys. Rev. B 15, 3384–3400 (1977)

    1977

  51. [59]

    Determination of the superfluid gap in atomic Fermi gases by quasiparticle spectroscopy,

    Andr ´e Schirotzek, Yong-il Shin, Christian H. Schunck, and Wolfgang Ketterle, “Determination of the superfluid gap in atomic Fermi gases by quasiparticle spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 140403 (2008)

    2008

  52. [60]

    Shear viscosity of the B phase of superfluid 3He. III,

    Yoshimasa A. Ono, Jun’ichiro Hara, and Katsuhiko Nagai, “Shear viscosity of the B phase of superfluid 3He. III,” Jour- nal of Low Temperature Physics 48, 167–188 (1982)

    1982

  53. [61]

    Conformal non-relativistic hydrodynamics from gravity,

    Mukund Rangamani, Simon F Ross, D.T Son, and Ethan G Thompson, “Conformal non-relativistic hydrodynamics from gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2009, 075–075 (2009)

    2009

  54. [62]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases,

    Cheng Chin, Rudolf Grimm, Paul Julienne, and Eite Tiesinga, “Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225–1286 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    Precise characterization of 6Li feshbach reso- nances using trap-sideband-resolved rf spectroscopy of weakly bound molecules,

    G. Z ¨urn, T. Lompe, A. N. Wenz, S. Jochim, P. S. Julienne, and J. M. Hutson, “Precise characterization of 6Li feshbach reso- nances using trap-sideband-resolved rf spectroscopy of weakly bound molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 135301 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    Low-momentum dynamic structure factor of a strongly interacting Fermi gas at finite tem- perature: A two-fluid hydrodynamic description,

    Hui Hu, Peng Zou, and Xia-Ji Liu, “Low-momentum dynamic structure factor of a strongly interacting Fermi gas at finite tem- perature: A two-fluid hydrodynamic description,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 023615 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    First and Second Sound in Cylindrically Trapped Gases,

    G Bertaina, L Pitaevskii, and S Stringari, “First and Second Sound in Cylindrically Trapped Gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150402 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    Second sound and the superfluid fraction in a Fermi gas with resonant interac- tions,

    Leonid A Sidorenkov, Meng Khoon Tey, Rudolf Grimm, Yan- Hua Hou, Lev Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari, “Second sound and the superfluid fraction in a Fermi gas with resonant interac- tions,” Nature498, 78–81 (2013). 8 Universal Sound Diffusion in a Strongly Interacting Fermi Ga...

    2013

  59. [67]

    An exact sum rule relates the integral of Im(ω,k )/ω to the isothermal compressibility [47, 64]

    a temperature wave that propagates ballistically [65, 66]. An exact sum rule relates the integral of Im(ω,k )/ω to the isothermal compressibility [47, 64]. The integral W1 =∫ dω Im[χ(ω,k )]/ω over only the first-sound peak isnπ/(2mc2), related to the speed of sound and thus the...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.