Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 67 references

Gas velocity structure of the Orion A Integral Shaped Filament

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that supersonic gas in Orion A's Integral Shaped Filament may still be deeply gravitationally bound, with a possible 1.4 Myr^-1 rotation.

desk verdict A useful multi-tracer kinematics paper whose central 'deeply bound' claim is weakened by a factor-of-three error in the kinetic energy normalization. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02589 v1 pith:JT4UAJQU submitted 2019-09-05 astro-ph.GA

Valentina González Lobos , Amelia M. Stutz This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords molecularcloudsOrionAIntegralShapedFilamentposition-velocitydiagramsvelocitydispersiongravitationalpotentialsupersonicturbulencestarformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the gas kinematics of the Integral Shaped Filament in Orion A using four molecular-line tracers spanning a wide range of critical densities. It claims that the filament's non-thermal line widths, although supersonic with Mach numbers of 5 to 15, correspond to specific kinetic energies that lie below the gravitational potential of the filament and the embedded Orion Nebula Cluster almost everywhere; the only exception is a small central region where the low-density CO gas approaches the potential. The paper also reports two distinct 12CO velocity components in the northern filament that, if interpreted as circular rotation, give an angular velocity of 1.4 $Myr^{-1}$, and small-scale NH3 and N2H+ structures it describes as 'twisting and turning.' A sympathetic reader would care because if the claim holds, supersonic line widths in this massive filament are not evidence of instability, and a slow large-scale rotational or wave-like mode is present.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the comparison of measured non-thermal line widths to previously derived gravitational potentials. The non-thermal dispersion is obtained by subtracting the thermal term $\sqrt{kT_k/m}$ from the observed width, using the dust temperature power law $T_d=9\,(r/{\rm pc})^{0.22}\,{\rm K}$ as a proxy for kinetic temperature; the resulting $\sigma_{\rm NT}$ enters the specific kinetic energy $\frac{1}{2}\sigma_{\rm NT}^2$ plotted against $\Phi_{\rm ISF}$ and $\Phi_{\rm ONC}$. The visualization tool that uncovers the kinematic features is the intensity-weighted position-velocity diagram, where each pixel's line velocity centroid is plotted against declination and weighted by integrated emission, revealing structures muddled in traditional PV diagrams. The rotation signature is extracted by identifying two 12CO velocity loci in the northern filament and applying the circular model $\omega = (\delta v / 2) / r$ with $\delta v = 3.6\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ and $r = 1.3\,{\rm pc}$.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the line-of-sight depth and three-dimensional geometry of the ISF, for example from dust polarization, parallax gradients, or multi-line radiative transfer, that shows the true gravitational potential is below the measured kinetic energy over a broad area beyond the central 0.04 pc would falsify the claim that the gas is deeply bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated in Section 4.2, is that the non-thermal line widths are consistent with the gas being deeply gravitationally bound: when the specific kinetic energy $\frac{1}{2}\sigma_{\rm NT}^2$ inferred from the four tracers is compared with the analytic ISF and ONC gravitational potentials $\Phi_{\rm ISF}(R)=6.3\,(R/{\rm pc})^{3/8}\,({\rm km\,s^{-1}})^2$ and $\Phi_{\rm ONC}(R)=27.6\,(R/{\rm pc})^{0.225}\,({\rm km\,s^{-1}})^2$, the potential dominates almost everywhere, despite Mach numbers of 5 to 15. Only in the central roughly 0.04 pc region do the low-density 12CO and 13CO kinetic energies become comparable to the potential. The paper further reports, for the first time, a double 12CO velocity locus in the northern ISF with components near $v_{\rm LSR}=6.9$ and $10.5\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$; interpreting these as circular rotation with spatial separation $r=1.3\,{\rm pc}$ gives $\omega=1.4\,{\rm Myr^{-1}}$. Small-scale NH3 and N2H+ 'twisting and turning' structures are detected with short associated timescales, giving the impression of a torsional wave, though the paper states their nature and relation to the larger-scale wave are not yet understood.

Load-bearing premise

The bound conclusion assumes the analytic ISF and ONC gravitational potential profiles are accurate, but those profiles were obtained by deprojecting observed gas and stellar mass distributions under cylindrical and spherical symmetry, so if the true three-dimensional geometry is different the potential could be overestimated and the kinetic energy could approach or exceed it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the gas is deeply bound while supersonic, turbulent pressure alone is not disrupting the filament; collapse or additional support from magnetic fields or rotation is required.
  • Dense-gas tracers (NH3, N2H+) show roughly six times smaller non-thermal line widths than CO, so CO-only analyses overestimate turbulent support in the dense gas where stars form.
  • The 1.4 Myr^-1 angular velocity, if rotational, is fast enough to matter dynamically on the filament's roughly 1 Myr free-fall and wave timescales.
  • The observed north-south velocity gradient ending at the ONC is consistent with a standing-wave interpretation and provides a kinematic test for the Slingshot scenario for the filament.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the two CO velocity components are two sides of a rotating filament, higher-resolution maps should show the velocity split increasing with projected distance from the filament spine; this can be tested with existing interferometric data.
  • Editorial inference: the near-periodic roughly 0.44 pc spacing of the 12CO velocity peaks and their roughly 1 Myr timescale suggest the small-scale 'twisting' and the large-scale wave share a common dynamical clock; a unified model could predict the phase relation between the two.
  • Editorial inference: the deeply-bound conclusion is only as secure as the deprojected gravitational potentials; a direct measurement of the three-dimensional geometry of the ISF would be the decisive test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes the gas kinematics of the Orion A Integral Shaped Filament (ISF) using public observations of 12CO(1-0), 13CO(1-0), NH3(1,1), and N2H+(1-0). The authors introduce an intensity-weighted position-velocity (PV) diagram technique and apply it to trace a north-south velocity gradient, a blue-shifted velocity peak near the ONC, and small-scale 'twisting and turning' structures. They measure non-thermal line-width profiles, compute Mach numbers and specific kinetic energies K = (1/2)σ_NT^2, and compare these to analytic gravitational potential profiles for the ISF and ONC taken from Stutz & Gould (2016) and Stutz (2018); they conclude that the gas is deeply gravitationally bound despite Mach numbers of 5–15. They also identify two 12CO velocity components in the northern ISF and, if interpreted as circular rotation, derive ω = 1.4 Myr−1 from Eq. (3). An appendix analyzes regularly spaced blueshifted 12CO velocity peaks and cross-matches them with YSO/protostar catalogs.

Significance. The intensity-weighted PV visualization is a useful addition and is well suited to the multi-tracer comparison; the Monte Carlo test for the N2H+ S/N threshold and the residual checks are careful steps. The paper exploits public data and compares four tracers spanning a wide range of critical densities, which is genuinely informative. If the binding conclusion were correct, it would be an important counterexample to the common assumption that supersonic line widths imply unbound gas. However, the central energy comparison in Section 4.2 uses a 1D dispersion as if it were the total turbulent kinetic energy, which changes the quantitative conclusion and may overturn the headline claim for the lower-density gas. The rotation interpretation in Section 4.4 is explicitly conditional but is presented in the abstract without the same caution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Figure 6] The binding comparison uses K = (1/2)σ_NT^2 with σ_NT derived from the observed line-of-sight line width. For an isotropic turbulent velocity field, the specific kinetic energy is (3/2)σ_NT^2, so the binding criterion should be σ_NT^2 < (2/3)Φ, not σ_NT^2 < 2Φ. Quantitatively, the northern 12CO average σ_NT = 1.61 km s−1 gives (3/2)σ_NT^2 ≈ 3.9 (km s−1)^2, exceeding the ISF potential Φ ≈ 2.7 (km s−1)^2 at r = 0.1 pc, whereas the paper's (1/2)σ_NT^2 ≈ 1.3 (km s−1)^2 is well below it. This is a factor-of-three normalization issue in the headline result, and it must be corrected or explicitly justified before the conclusion 'deeply gravitationally bound' can stand.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The gravitational potential profiles are adopted from Stutz & Gould (2016) and Stutz (2018) without re-derivation or sensitivity testing. Since the central claim is quantitative ('dominates almost everywhere'), the paper should include a robustness test: for example, recompute the binding condition under a plausible lower-limit potential, such as varying the assumed deprojected geometry or line-of-sight depth, and state whether the conclusion survives. As written, the claim depends entirely on the accuracy of the borrowed profiles.
  3. [Section 4.4, Eq. (3)] The two 12CO velocity components are identified visually in the PV diagrams, with no spectral decomposition or uncertainty estimate, and the value r = 1.3 pc is assumed to be the rotation radius. Because the line-of-sight geometry and inclination are unknown, the relation between the observed Δv and a true angular velocity is not established. The abstract reports ω = 1.4 Myr−1 without the caution that appears in the body ('if interpreted as circular rotation'); this should be rephrased and the assumptions and uncertainties of Eq. (3) should be quantified.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sections 2.3 and 2.4] The word 'pannel' should be 'panel' in both places.
  2. [Figure 5 caption, Section 4.1] The ONC region is written as 'δ−5.48°' in the caption; an equals sign appears to be missing and it should read 'δ = −5.48°'.
  3. [Abstract, Section 4.4, Section 5] 'impresion' and 'remiscent' are typos for 'impression' and 'reminiscent'.
  4. [Figure 4 caption] The first-panel axis label 'M /uni2299p⊙−1' appears corrupted and should read M☉/pc.
  5. [Section 4.2, references] The reference to Liu et al. (2019) in the text is incomplete in the bibliography ('MNRAS, p. 1279'); please provide the full volume and page range.
  6. [Section 4.4, Eq. (3)] The symbol δv is used in Eq. (3) but is not explicitly defined in the text; it should be stated to be the velocity difference between the two components, approximately 3.6 km s−1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the line-width comparison and rotation conversion rest on independent measurements or explicit kinematic definitions, not on fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The central bound claim compares newly fitted non-thermal line widths (12CO, 13CO, NH3, N2H+) to gravitational potentials taken from Stutz & Gould (2016) and Stutz (2018). Those potentials were derived from Herschel column density and stellar mass maps, not from the line-width data used here, and the present paper does not adjust the potentials to force the comparison. The kinetic energy K = 1/2 sigma_NT^2 and the potential Phi are therefore independent inputs; the conclusion is a comparison, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Equation (3) is an explicit kinematic conversion omega = (delta v / 2) / r applied to a two-component velocity signature that the paper itself labels conditional ('if interpreted as circular rotation'); the interpretation does not feed back into the measurement. The dust temperature profile from Reissl et al. (2018) is an adopted external model, and the self-citations to Stutz & Gould, Stutz, and Stutz et al. supply data products (column density maps, ridgeline, potential) rather than the target conclusion. The isotropic 3D kinetic-energy factor (3/2 sigma_NT^2) is a legitimate physical/correctness critique of the bound claim, but it is not an input-output equivalence, so it is outside the circularity definition. No circular step can be exhibited by quoting an equation in which the result is defined by the input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All data are public observations, but the quantitative conclusions borrow several fitted inputs from earlier papers. The gravitational potential coefficients and the dust temperature power law are adopted without re-derivation and directly determine the bound verdict and the Mach numbers. The 12CO rotation rate also uses an eye-estimated spatial separation r = 1.3 pc. No new physical entities are introduced; the torsional wave and rotation are interpretive labels for observed velocity structures.

free parameters (4)
  • Dust temperature power law T_d = 9 (r/pc)^0.22 K = normalization 9 K, exponent 0.22
    Adopted from the Reissl et al. (2018) radiative transfer model and used in Section 4.2 to subtract thermal line widths and compute Mach numbers. The bound conclusion is only mildly sensitive to this, but the quoted Mach numbers 5 to 15 scale with it.
  • ISF gravitational potential normalization and exponent = Phi_ISF = 6.3 (R/pc)^(3/8) km^2/s^2
    Adopted from Stutz and Gould (2016), derived by deprojecting Herschel column density and stellar mass maps. This is the benchmark against which the kinetic energy is compared in Figure 6, so the deeply bound claim rests on it.
  • ONC gravitational potential normalization and exponent = Phi_ONC = 27.6 (R/pc)^0.225 km^2/s^2
    Adopted from Stutz (2018), used in the same comparison for the cluster region.
  • Spatial separation r between the two 12CO velocity components = 1.3 pc
    Estimated visually from the PV diagram in Figure 8; Equation (3) uses it to convert the velocity split into omega = 1.4 Myr^-1. The rotation rate is inversely proportional to this choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The gravitational potential profiles from Stutz and Gould (2016) and Stutz (2018), obtained by deprojecting observed mass distributions under cylindrical and spherical symmetry, correctly describe the true potential of the ISF and ONC.
    Used in Section 4.2 and Equations (1)-(2) for the comparison that yields the deeply gravitationally bound conclusion.
  • domain assumption The kinetic temperature of the gas equals the dust temperature profile T_d = 9 (r/pc)^0.22 K from Reissl et al. (2018).
    Used in Section 4.2 to subtract thermal line widths and compute Mach numbers; if T_k differs, sigma_NT and the kinetic-energy comparison change.
  • domain assumption The dust ridgeline from Stutz (2018) marks the center of the gravitational potential well of the ISF.
    Used to define projected radius r = 0 for the dispersion and Mach number profiles in Section 4.2; if the ridgeline is offset, the radial profiles change shape.
  • domain assumption For the 12CO rotation interpretation, the two velocity loci at 6.9 and 10.5 km/s are coherent gas structures physically separated by 1.3 pc, rather than unrelated line-of-sight clouds or outflow signatures.
    Assumed in Section 4.4 to derive omega = 1.4 Myr^-1; the authors themselves list outflows and cloud-cloud collisions as alternative explanations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gas velocity structure of the Orion A Integral Shaped Filament." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JT4UAJQU

@misc{pith2026190902589,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gas velocity structure of the Orion A Integral Shaped Filament},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JT4UAJQU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02589}
}
abstract

We present analysis of the gas kinematics of the Integral Shaped Filament (ISF) in Orion~A using four different molecular lines, $^{12}$CO (1-0), $^{13}$CO (1-0), NH$_3$ (1,1), and N$_2$H$^+$ (1-0). We describe our method to visualize the position-velocity (PV) structure using the intensity-weighted line velocity centroid, which enables us to identify structures that were previously muddled or invisible. We observe a north to south velocity gradient in all tracers that terminates in a velocity peak near the center of the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC), consistent with the previously reported "wave-like" properties of the ISF. We extract the velocity dispersion profiles and compare the non-thermal line widths to the gas gravitational potential. We find supersonic Mach number profiles, yet the line widths are consistent with the gas being deeply gravitationally bound. We report the presence of two $^{12}$CO velocity components along the northern half of the ISF; if interpreted as circular rotation, the angular velocity is $\omega=1.4\,{\rm Myr}^{-1}$. On small scales we report the detection of N$_2$H$^+$ and NH$_3$ "twisting and turning" structures, with short associated timescales that give the impression of a torsional wave. Neither the nature of these structures nor their relation to the larger scale wave is presently understood.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02589 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: N2H+ (1-0) integrated intensity map of the ISF region from Tatematsu et al. (2008). Right: NH3 (1,1) velocity integrated emission map of the ISF region from Friesen et al. (2017). A 1 pc scalebar is shown at the bottom of each panel. The blue curve is the column density ridgeline (Stutz 2018). The area covered by the N2H+ map corresponds to the blue box in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: N2H+ intensity-weighted velocity centroid as a function of δ. Right: “Traditional” N2H+ position-velocity diagram of the velocity centroid as a function of δ, without intensity weighting. The red ×-symbol denotes the center of mass coordinate of the ONC stars and the mean velocity of the cluster stars Stutz (2018). The intensity-weighted diagram (left) enables us to identify structures that are either muddled … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. From left to right: Mass per unit length as a function of δ of the gas (black curve) from Stutz (2018) and young stars (red curve) from Megeath et al. (2016) in the ISF; intensity-weighted velocity centroid as a function of δ for N2H+, NH3, 12CO and 13CO, respectively. The position-velocity centroid (PV) diagrams are obtained from the integrated emission and velocity centroid maps for all tracers (see text). All dia… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Potential as a function of radius. The black (pink) solid curve represents the gravitational potential as a function of projected radius of the ISF (ONC) from Stutz & Gould (2016) (Stutz 2018). The grey and red curves represent the specific ki￾netic energy from turbule…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the velocity ridgelines of the four tracers (left panel) and the difference relative to the N2H + velocity ridgeline (right panel). This figure shows that the four trac￾ers have very similar ridgelines along the filament, except 6   L     …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Position-velocity centroid diagram of 12CO in the ISF. This map includes the full range of α values in the 12CO map. The red dashed lines indicate vLSR ∼ 6.9 km s−1 and vLSR ∼ 10.5 km s−1 , the velocities of the two components in the Northern region of the ISF (seen be…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Stark A

    Bally J., Langer W. D., Stark A. A., Wilson R. W., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...312L..45B 312, L45

    doi:10.1086/184817 1987

  2. [2]

    Bally J., Ginsburg A., Arce H., Eisner J., Youngblood A., Zapata L., Zinnecker H., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c8b , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837...60B 837, 60

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c8b 2017

  3. [3]

    E., Neugebauer G., 1967, @doi [ ] 10.1086/149055 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ApJ...147..799B 147, 799

    Becklin E. E., Neugebauer G., 1967, @doi [ ] 10.1086/149055 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ApJ...147..799B 147, 799

    doi:10.1086/149055 1967

  4. [4]

    Chini R., Reipurth B., Ward-Thompson D., Bally J., Nyman L.- ., Sievers A., Billawala Y., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310436 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...474L.135C 474, L135

    doi:10.1086/310436 1997

  5. [5]

    T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..187C 872, 187

    Chuss D. T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..187C 872, 187

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafd37 2019

  6. [6]

    M., et al., 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    A., Henning T., Stassun K

    Da Rio N., Robberto M., Hillenbrand L. A., Henning T., Stassun K. G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...748...14D 748, 14

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/14 2012

  8. [8]

    Daniel F., Dubernet M.-L., Meuwly M., Cernicharo J., Pagani L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09542.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363.1083D 363, 1083

    arXiv 2005

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Federrath C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2880 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457..375F 457, 375

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    K., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d58 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...63F 843, 63

    Friesen R. K., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d58 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...63F 843, 63

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Fukui Y., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..166F 859, 166

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Furlan E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..224....5F 224, 5

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    V., Broos P

    Getman K. V., Broos P. S., Kuhn M. A., Feigelson E. D., Richert A. J. W., Ota Y., Bate M. R., Garmire G. P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/229/2/28 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..229...28G 229, 28

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    V., Feigelson E

    Getman K. V., Feigelson E. D., Kuhn M. A., Garmire G. P., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190510251G p. arXiv:1905.10251

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ginsburg A., Mirocha J., 2011, PySpecKit: Python Spectroscopic Toolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library ( @eprint ascl 1109.001 )

    2011

  8. [16]

    E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A.106G 619, A106

    Gro schedl J. E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A.106G 619, A106

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730732 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    Hacar A., Alves J., Tafalla M., Goicoechea J. R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730732 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731894 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    Hacar A., Tafalla M., Forbrich J., Alves J., Meingast S., Grossschedl J., Teixeira P. S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731894 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Hanawa T., et al., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...404L..83H 404, L83

    1993 doi

  12. [20]

    Heiles C., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJS..111..245H 111, 245

    1997 doi

  13. [21]

    K., Tan J

    Hernandez A. K., Tan J. C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/44 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730...44H 730, 44

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    A., Hartmann L

    Hillenbrand L. A., Hartmann L. W., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305076 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...492..540H 492, 540

    1998 doi

  15. [23]

    Ikeda N., Sunada K., Kitamura Y., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519484 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1194I 665, 1194

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    J., Mergen J., Odewahn S., Gehrz R

    Jones T. J., Mergen J., Odewahn S., Gehrz R. D., Gatley I., Merrill K. M., Probst R., Woodward C. E., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117023 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....107.2120J 107, 2120

    1994 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Stanke T., Abreu-Vicente J., Beuther H., Henning T., Johnston K

    Kainulainen J., Stutz A. M., Stanke T., Abreu-Vicente J., Beuther H., Henning T., Johnston K. G., Megeath S. T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628481 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    E., Low F

    Kleinmann D. E., Low F. J., 1967, @doi [ ] 10.1086/180039 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ApJ...149L...1K 149, L1

    1967 doi

  19. [27]

    Kong S., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aabafc , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..236...25K 236, 25

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    Kounkel M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad1f1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156...84K 156, 84

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    Kroupa P., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S1384-1076(99)00048-2 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000NewA....4..615K 4, 615

    2000 doi

  22. [30]

    Kroupa P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..231K 322, 231

    2001

  23. [31]

    Liu H.-L., Stutz A., Yuan J.-H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1340 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.tmp.1279L p. 1279

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    C., Wilson C

    Matthews B. C., Wilson C. D., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308523 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...531..868M 531, 868

    2000 doi

  25. [33]

    T., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/6/192 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..192M 144, 192

    Megeath S. T., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/6/192 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..192M 144, 192

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151....5M 151, 5

    Megeath S. T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151....5M 151, 5

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    A., Lada E

    Muench A. A., Lada E. A., Lada C. J., Alves J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340554 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...573..366M 573, 366

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    Nishimura A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...18N 216, 18

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Pattle K., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa80e5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...846..122P 846, 122

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2831 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457..313P 457, 313

    Portegies Zwart S. F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2831 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457..313P 457, 313

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    M., Brauer R., Pellegrini E

    Reissl S., Stutz A. M., Brauer R., Pellegrini E. W., Schleicher D. R. G., Klessen R., 2018, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv180502674R ( @eprint arXiv 1805.02674 )

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    H., Gutermuth R., Snell R

    Ripple F., Heyer M. H., Gutermuth R., Snell R. L., Brunt C. M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt247 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.1296R 431, 1296

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    V., Mundt R., Eisl \"o ffel J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811427 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A

    Rodr \' guez-Ledesma M. V., Mundt R., Eisl \"o ffel J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811427 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A

    2009 doi

  34. [42]

    J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2297 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1769S 449, 1769

    Salji C. J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2297 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1769S 449, 1769

    2015 doi

  35. [43]

    N., Kazarovets E

    Samus' N. N., Kazarovets E. V., Durlevich O. V., Kireeva N. N., Pastukhova E. N., 2017, @doi [Astronomy Reports] 10.1134/S1063772917010085 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARep...61...80S 61, 80

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    F., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/29 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786...29S 786, 29

    Schlafly E. F., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/29 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786...29S 786, 29

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    Schleicher D. R. G., Stutz A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2975 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..121S 475, 121

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    Shimajiri Y., Takahashi S., Takakuwa S., Saito M., Kawabe R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/61.5.1055 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PASJ...61.1055S 61, 1055

    2009 doi

  39. [47]

    L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/680342 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..299S 127, 299

    Shirley Y. L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/680342 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..299S 127, 299

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    Stanke T., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L..94S 518, L94

    2010 doi

  41. [49]

    M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2629 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4890S 473, 4890

    Stutz A. M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2629 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4890S 473, 4890

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    M., Gould A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527979 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    Stutz A. M., Gould A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527979 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  43. [51]

    M., Kainulainen J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526243 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    Stutz A. M., Kainulainen J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526243 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/36 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...36S 767, 36

    Stutz A. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/36 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...36S 767, 36

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Gonzalez-Lobos V

    Stutz A. M., Gonzalez-Lobos V. I., Gould A., 2018, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv180711496S p. arXiv:1807.11496

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    C., Kainulainen J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732219 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...614A.100T 614, A100

    Tahani M., Plume R., Brown J. C., Kainulainen J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732219 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...614A.100T 614, A100

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Tatematsu K., et al., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...404..643T 404, 643

    1993 doi

  48. [56]

    Tatematsu K., Kandori R., Umemoto T., Sekimoto Y., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/60.3.407 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008PASJ...60..407T 60, 407

    2008 doi

  49. [57]

    Tatematsu K., Ohashi S., Sanhueza P., Nguyen Luong Q., Umemoto T., Mizuno N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psw002 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASJ...68...24T 68, 24

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    S., Takahashi S., Zapata L

    Teixeira P. S., Takahashi S., Zapata L. A., Ho P. T. P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526807 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    J., Hartmann L., Furesz G., Mateo M., Megeath S

    Tobin J. J., Hartmann L., Furesz G., Mateo M., Megeath S. T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1103 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697.1103T 697, 1103

    2009 doi

  52. [60]

    Tsujimoto M., Koyama K., Tsuboi Y., Goto M., Kobayashi N., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338110 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566..974T 566, 974

    2002 doi

  53. [61]

    T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/346277 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125.1537T 125, 1537

    Tsujimoto M., Koyama K., Kobayashi N., Goto M., Tsuboi Y., Tokunaga A. T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/346277 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125.1537T 125, 1537

    2003 doi

  54. [62]

    Wenger M., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000332 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A

    2000 doi

  55. [63]

    L., Rohlfs K., H \"u ttemeister S., 2009, Tools of Radio Astronomy

    Wilson T. L., Rohlfs K., H \"u ttemeister S., 2009, Tools of Radio Astronomy . Springer-Verlag, @doi 10.1007/978-3-540-85122-6

    2009 doi

  56. [64]

    Wu G., Jarken E., Baan W., Zhou J.-J., Zhou D.-D., Han X.-H., Agishev A., 2018, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/18/7/77 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RAA....18...77W 18, 077

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    C., Bally J., Devine D., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310799 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...485L..45Y 485, L45

    Yu K. C., Bally J., Devine D., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310799 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...485L..45Y 485, L45

    1997 doi

  58. [66]

    A., Schmid-Burgk J., Ho P

    Zapata L. A., Schmid-Burgk J., Ho P. T. P., Rodr \' guez L. F., Menten K. M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/L45 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...704L..45Z 704, L45

    2009 doi

  59. [67]

    Zari E., Hashemi H., Brown A. G. A., Jardine K., de Zeeuw P. T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.172Z 620, A172

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.