REVIEW 2 cited by
DARTS+: Improved Differentiable Architecture Search with Early Stopping
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recently, there has been a growing interest in automating the process of neural architecture design, and the Differentiable Architecture Search (DARTS) method makes the process available within a few GPU days. However, the performance of DARTS is often observed to collapse when the number of search epochs becomes large. Meanwhile, lots of "{\em skip-connect}s" are found in the selected architectures. In this paper, we claim that the cause of the collapse is that there exists overfitting in the optimization of DARTS. Therefore, we propose a simple and effective algorithm, named "DARTS+", to avoid the collapse and improve the original DARTS, by "early stopping" the search procedure when meeting a certain criterion. We also conduct comprehensive experiments on benchmark datasets and different search spaces and show the effectiveness of our DARTS+ algorithm, and DARTS+ achieves $2.32\%$ test error on CIFAR10, $14.87\%$ on CIFAR100, and $23.7\%$ on ImageNet. We further remark that the idea of "early stopping" is implicitly included in some existing DARTS variants by manually setting a small number of search epochs, while we give an {\em explicit} criterion for "early stopping".
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DASViT: Differentiable Architecture Search for Vision Transformer
DASViT searches Vision Transformer encoder topologies with a gradient-based DARTS approach and reports architectures that outperform ViT-B/16 on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-100 without pre-training.
-
confopt: A Library for Implementation and Evaluation of Gradient-based One-Shot NAS Methods
A library and nine DARTS-derived benchmarks show that relative rankings of gradient-based one-shot NAS methods are unstable, making DARTS-only evaluation unreliable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.