Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CogniVal: A Framework for Cognitive Word Embedding Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.09001 v2 pith:GOL7D3FN submitted 2019-09-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords wordcognitivedatasetsevaluationframeworkrepresentationsevaluatingextrinsic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An interesting method of evaluating word representations is by how much they reflect the semantic representations in the human brain. However, most, if not all, previous works only focus on small datasets and a single modality. In this paper, we present the first multi-modal framework for evaluating English word representations based on cognitive lexical semantics. Six types of word embeddings are evaluated by fitting them to 15 datasets of eye-tracking, EEG and fMRI signals recorded during language processing. To achieve a global score over all evaluation hypotheses, we apply statistical significance testing accounting for the multiple comparisons problem. This framework is easily extensible and available to include other intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation methods. We find strong correlations in the results between cognitive datasets, across recording modalities and to their performance on extrinsic NLP tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probing the contents of semantic representations from text, behavior, and brain data using the psychNorms metabase

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Behavior-based word embeddings, especially from free associations, capture unique affective, agentic, and socio-moral information compared to text-based embeddings.

Pith tools