REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Equivalence between Positional Node Embeddings and Structural Graph Representations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This work provides the first unifying theoretical framework for node (positional) embeddings and structural graph representations, bridging methods like matrix factorization and graph neural networks. Using invariant theory, we show that the relationship between structural representations and node embeddings is analogous to that of a distribution and its samples. We prove that all tasks that can be performed by node embeddings can also be performed by structural representations and vice-versa. We also show that the concept of transductive and inductive learning is unrelated to node embeddings and graph representations, clearing another source of confusion in the literature. Finally, we introduce new practical guidelines to generating and using node embeddings, which fixes significant shortcomings of standard operating procedures used today.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
GNNs Meet Sequence Models Along the Shortest-Path: an Expressive Method for Link Prediction
SP4LP encodes a candidate link by feeding the GNN embeddings of nodes on the shortest path between its endpoints into a sequence model, and claims provable expressiveness gains over prior GNN link predictors.
-
How do Probabilistic Graphical Models and Graph Neural Networks Look at Network Data?
SBM-style probabilistic models outperform graph neural networks on link prediction when node features are low-dimensional, noisy, or the graph is heterophilic.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.