REVIEW 1 cited by
Higher N-point function data analysis techniques for heavy particle production and WMAP results
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We explore data analysis techniques for signatures from heavy particle production during inflation. Heavy particules can be produced by time dependent masses and couplings, which are ubiquitous in string theory. These localized excitations induce curvature perturbations with non-zero correlation functions at all orders. In particular, Flauger et. al. 2016 has shown that the signal-to-noise as a function of the order $N$ of the correlation function can peak for $N$ of order $\mathcal{O}(1)$ to $\mathcal{O}(100)$ for an interesting space of models. As previous non-Gaussianity analyses have focused on $N=\{3,4\}$, in principle this provides an unexplored data analysis window with new discovery potential. We derive estimators for arbitrary $N$-point functions in this model and discuss their properties and covariances. To lowest order, the heavy particle production phenomenology reduces to a classical Poisson process, which can be implemented as a search for spherically symmetric profiles in the curvature perturbations. We explicitly show how to recover this result from the $N$-point functions and their estimators. Our focus in this paper is on method development, but we provide an initial data analysis using WMAP data, which illustrates the particularities of higher $N$-point function searches.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: testing a new beyond-$\Lambda$CDM parameter with cosmological data
Timelike boundaries sourcing negative, 1/a-scaling vacuum energy fit CMB+BAO data slightly better than LCDM and relax the neutrino-mass constraint, though the preference is only about 2 sigma.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.