REVIEW 1 cited by
Race and Religion in Online Abuse towards UK Politicians: Working Paper
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Against a backdrop of tensions related to EU membership, we find levels of online abuse toward UK MPs reach a new high. Race and religion have become pressing topics globally, and in the UK this interacts with "Brexit" and the rise of social media to create a complex social climate in which much can be learned about evolving attitudes. In 8 million tweets by and to UK MPs in the first half of 2019, religious intolerance scandals in the UK's two main political parties attracted significant attention. Furthermore, high profile ethnic minority MPs started conversations on Twitter about race and religion, the responses to which provide a valuable source of insight. We found a significant presence for disturbing racial and religious abuse. We also explore metrics relating to abuse patterns, which may affect its impact. We find "burstiness" of abuse doesn't depend on race or gender, but individual factors may lead to politicians having very different experiences online.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Hostility Detection in UK Politics: A Dataset on Online Abuse Targeting MPs
A new publicly available dataset of 3,320 tweets from 2020 to 2022 labels hostility toward UK MPs and the targeted identity type, with benchmarks for BERT, RoBERTa, LLaMA, and GPT models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.