Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Race and Religion in Online Abuse towards UK Politicians: Working Paper

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.00920 v2 pith:Y3VDX7TM submitted 2019-10-02 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords abuseraceonlinereligionfindhighpoliticiansreligious
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Against a backdrop of tensions related to EU membership, we find levels of online abuse toward UK MPs reach a new high. Race and religion have become pressing topics globally, and in the UK this interacts with "Brexit" and the rise of social media to create a complex social climate in which much can be learned about evolving attitudes. In 8 million tweets by and to UK MPs in the first half of 2019, religious intolerance scandals in the UK's two main political parties attracted significant attention. Furthermore, high profile ethnic minority MPs started conversations on Twitter about race and religion, the responses to which provide a valuable source of insight. We found a significant presence for disturbing racial and religious abuse. We also explore metrics relating to abuse patterns, which may affect its impact. We find "burstiness" of abuse doesn't depend on race or gender, but individual factors may lead to politicians having very different experiences online.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hostility Detection in UK Politics: A Dataset on Online Abuse Targeting MPs

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new publicly available dataset of 3,320 tweets from 2020 to 2022 labels hostility toward UK MPs and the targeted identity type, with benchmarks for BERT, RoBERTa, LLaMA, and GPT models.

Pith tools