Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.13913 v4 pith:HN5IWXFW submitted 2019-10-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords systemsbiasescoreferenceresolutiongenderinferencespeopleacknowledging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Correctly resolving textual mentions of people fundamentally entails making inferences about those people. Such inferences raise the risk of systemic biases in coreference resolution systems, including biases that can harm binary and non-binary trans and cis stakeholders. To better understand such biases, we foreground nuanced conceptualizations of gender from sociology and sociolinguistics, and develop two new datasets for interrogating bias in crowd annotations and in existing coreference resolution systems. Through these studies, conducted on English text, we confirm that without acknowledging and building systems that recognize the complexity of gender, we build systems that lead to many potential harms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Generative AI Ethics Playbook

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured playbook that collects existing guidance, checklists, and case studies to help generative AI practitioners identify and mitigate ethical harms across six lifecycle stages.

Pith tools