Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The DNNLikelihood: enhancing likelihood distribution with Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.03305 v2 pith:RYBNMIS6 submitted 2019-11-08 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-exphysics.data-an

classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-exphysics.data-an
keywords parametersdistributiondnnlikelihoodlikelihoodapproximationdeepdifferentdimensionality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce the DNNLikelihood, a novel framework to easily encode, through Deep Neural Networks (DNN), the full experimental information contained in complicated likelihood functions (LFs). We show how to efficiently parametrise the LF, treated as a multivariate function of parameters and nuisance parameters with high dimensionality, as an interpolating function in the form of a DNN predictor. We do not use any Gaussian approximation or dimensionality reduction, such as marginalisation or profiling over nuisance parameters, so that the full experimental information is retained. The procedure applies to both binned and unbinned LFs, and allows for an efficient distribution to multiple software platforms, e.g. through the framework-independent ONNX model format. The distributed DNNLikelihood can be used for different use cases, such as re-sampling through Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques, possibly with custom priors, combination with other LFs, when the correlations among parameters are known, and re-interpretation within different statistical approaches, i.e. Bayesian vs frequentist. We discuss the accuracy of our proposal and its relations with other approximation techniques and likelihood distribution frameworks. As an example, we apply our procedure to a pseudo-experiment corresponding to a realistic LHC search for new physics already considered in the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HDSense: An efficient method for ranking observable sensitivity

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HDSense ranks observable subsets by adding per-observable Fisher information and penalizing overlap, picking near-optimal sets for Pythia hadronization parameters in tested cases.

  2. Communicating Likelihoods with Normalising Flows

    hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A normalizing-flow workflow compresses sample-based likelihoods into small files, validated with a radial Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on three high-energy physics examples.

Pith tools