Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Latent space conditioning for improved classification and anomaly detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.10599 v2 pith:FYE35WHZ submitted 2019-11-24 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords anomalydetectionlatentspacevariationalautoencoderconditioningdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a new type of variational autoencoder to perform improved pre-processing for clustering and anomaly detection on data with a given label. Anomalies however are not known or labeled. We call our method conditional latent space variational autonencoder since it separates the latent space by conditioning on information within the data. The method fits one prior distribution to each class in the dataset, effectively expanding the prior distribution to include a Gaussian mixture model. Our approach is compared against the capabilities of a typical variational autoencoder by measuring their V-score during cluster formation with respect to the k-means and EM algorithms. For anomaly detection, we use a new metric composed of the mass-volume and excess-mass curves which can work in an unsupervised setting. We compare the results between established methods such as as isolation forest, local outlier factor and one-class support vector machine.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Traffic Anomalies from Generative Models on Real-Time Observations

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An STGAN model trained on Gothenburg traffic flows detects camera failures and weather anomalies with reported precision of 92.6-100% on a 10-day test set, but the precision is based on manual verification without bas...

Pith tools