Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MnasFPN: Learning Latency-aware Pyramid Architecture for Object Detection on Mobile Devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.01106 v2 pith:3RZO4RRJ submitted 2019-12-02 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords searchdetectionmnasfpnspacearchitectureobjectdesignhead
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the blooming success of architecture search for vision tasks in resource-constrained environments, the design of on-device object detection architectures have mostly been manual. The few automated search efforts are either centered around non-mobile-friendly search spaces or not guided by on-device latency. We propose MnasFPN, a mobile-friendly search space for the detection head, and combine it with latency-aware architecture search to produce efficient object detection models. The learned MnasFPN head, when paired with MobileNetV2 body, outperforms MobileNetV3+SSDLite by 1.8 mAP at similar latency on Pixel. It is also both 1.0 mAP more accurate and 10% faster than NAS-FPNLite. Ablation studies show that the majority of the performance gain comes from innovations in the search space. Further explorations reveal an interesting coupling between the search space design and the search algorithm, and that the complexity of MnasFPN search space may be at a local optimum.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SHeRL-FL: When Representation Learning Meets Split Learning in Hierarchical Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The submitted body is an unrelated survey, not the SHeRL-FL method claimed in the metadata.

Pith tools