Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.03593 v1 pith:QDRVV2ZL submitted 2019-12-08 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords racealgorithmicfairnessracialresearchaccountattributecategories
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine the way race and racial categories are adopted in algorithmic fairness frameworks. Current methodologies fail to adequately account for the socially constructed nature of race, instead adopting a conceptualization of race as a fixed attribute. Treating race as an attribute, rather than a structural, institutional, and relational phenomenon, can serve to minimize the structural aspects of algorithmic unfairness. In this work, we focus on the history of racial categories and turn to critical race theory and sociological work on race and ethnicity to ground conceptualizations of race for fairness research, drawing on lessons from public health, biomedical research, and social survey research. We argue that algorithmic fairness researchers need to take into account the multidimensionality of race, take seriously the processes of conceptualizing and operationalizing race, focus on social processes which produce racial inequality, and consider perspectives of those most affected by sociotechnical systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Auditing Facial Emotion Recognition Datasets for Posed Expressions and Racial Bias

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    An audit of AffectNet and RAF-DB finds many posed images and reports that two FER models disproportionately predict negative emotions for non-white and darker-skinned smiling faces, but the bias evidence lacks control...

Pith tools