Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Explanation of Machine Learning Predictions in Clinical Gait Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.07737 v2 pith:YODGNXSS submitted 2019-12-16 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords classificationgaitmethodsclinicalstatisticalanalysisapproachesdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used to support decision-making in the healthcare sector. While ML approaches provide promising results with regard to their classification performance, most share a central limitation, namely their black-box character. Motivated by the interest to understand the functioning of ML models, methods from the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) have recently become important. This article investigates the usefulness of XAI methods in clinical gait classification. For this purpose, predictions of state-of-the-art classification methods are explained with an established XAI method, i.e., Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP). We propose to evaluate the obtained explanations with two complementary approaches: a statistical analysis of the underlying data using Statistical Parametric Mapping and a qualitative evaluation by a clinical expert. A gait dataset comprising ground reaction force measurements from 132 patients with different lower-body gait disorders and 62 healthy controls is utilized. We investigate several gait classification tasks, employ multiple classification methods, and analyze the impact of data normalization and different signal components for classification performance and explanation quality. Our experiments show that explanations obtained by LRP exhibit promising statistical properties concerning inter-class discriminativity and are also in line with clinically relevant biomechanical gait characteristics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A User Study Evaluating Argumentative Explanations in Diagnostic Decision Support

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a study with eight physicians, AI explanations that list supporting features were rated more comprehensible and plausible than counterfactual or exclusion-based explanations, yet doctors were reluctant to use any A...

Pith tools