Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Solving quantum rotor model with different Monte Carlo techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.08229 v4 pith:HW3GMQM2 submitted 2019-12-17 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat
keywords quantumcarlomonterotormodelschemescriticaldifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We systematically test the performance of several Monte Carlo update schemes for the $(2+1)$d XY phase transition of quantum rotor model. By comparing the local Metropolis (LM), LM plus over-relaxation (OR), Wolff-cluster (WC), hybrid Monte Carlo (HM), hybrid Monte Carlo with Fourier acceleration (FA) scheme, it is clear that among the five different update schemes, at the quantum critical point, the WC and FA schemes acquire the smallest autocorrelation time and cost the least amount of CPU hours in achieving the same level of relative error, and FA enjoys a further advantage of easily implementable for more complicated interactions such as the long-range ones. These results bestow one with the necessary knowledge of extending the quantum rotor model, which plays the role of ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic critical bosons or Z$_2$ topological order, to more realistic and yet challenging models such as Fermi surface Yukawa-coupled to quantum rotor models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools