Pith. sign in

REVIEW

ESO architectures in the trajectory tracking ADR controller for a mechanical system: a comparison

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.06377 v2 pith:23O22726 submitted 2020-01-15 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords systemcontrollerdisturbancecomparisoncontroldesigneddifferentextended
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Proper operation of the Active Disturbance Rejection (ADR) controller requires a precise determination of the so-called total disturbance affecting the considered dynamical system, usually estimated by the Extended State Observer (ESO). The observation quality of total disturbance has a significant impact on the control error values, making room for a potential improvement of control system performance using different structures of ESO. In this article, we provide a quantitative comparison between the Luenberger and Astolfi/Marconi (AM) observers designed for three different extended state representations and utilized in the trajectory tracking ADR controller designed for a mechanical system. Included results were obtained in the simple simulation case, followed by the experimental validation on the main axis of a telescope mount.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools