Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.08709 v2 pith:LQVE2UF4 submitted 2020-02-20 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords losstrainingzeroemphlevelfloodfloodingapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Overparameterized deep networks have the capacity to memorize training data with zero \emph{training error}. Even after memorization, the \emph{training loss} continues to approach zero, making the model overconfident and the test performance degraded. Since existing regularizers do not directly aim to avoid zero training loss, it is hard to tune their hyperparameters in order to maintain a fixed/preset level of training loss. We propose a direct solution called \emph{flooding} that intentionally prevents further reduction of the training loss when it reaches a reasonably small value, which we call the \emph{flood level}. Our approach makes the loss float around the flood level by doing mini-batched gradient descent as usual but gradient ascent if the training loss is below the flood level. This can be implemented with one line of code and is compatible with any stochastic optimizer and other regularizers. With flooding, the model will continue to "random walk" with the same non-zero training loss, and we expect it to drift into an area with a flat loss landscape that leads to better generalization. We experimentally show that flooding improves performance and, as a byproduct, induces a double descent curve of the test loss.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Instance-dependent Early Stopping

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    IES removes already-mastered training examples from backpropagation using a threshold on the second-order difference of their loss, achieving comparable accuracy with 10-50% less backpropagation.

Pith tools