REVIEW 2 cited by
On Certifying Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via Randomized Smoothing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Backdoor attack is a severe security threat to deep neural networks (DNNs). We envision that, like adversarial examples, there will be a cat-and-mouse game for backdoor attacks, i.e., new empirical defenses are developed to defend against backdoor attacks but they are soon broken by strong adaptive backdoor attacks. To prevent such cat-and-mouse game, we take the first step towards certified defenses against backdoor attacks. Specifically, in this work, we study the feasibility and effectiveness of certifying robustness against backdoor attacks using a recent technique called randomized smoothing. Randomized smoothing was originally developed to certify robustness against adversarial examples. We generalize randomized smoothing to defend against backdoor attacks. Our results show the theoretical feasibility of using randomized smoothing to certify robustness against backdoor attacks. However, we also find that existing randomized smoothing methods have limited effectiveness at defending against backdoor attacks, which highlight the needs of new theory and methods to certify robustness against backdoor attacks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Robustness Certificates for Neural Networks Against Data Poisoning and Evasion Attacks
A neural-network barrier certificate over training trajectories certifies ℓ_p-bounded data-poisoning and evasion budgets, with PAC-style confidence, on MNIST, SVHN, and CIFAR-10.
-
Certifying Language Model Robustness with Fuzzed Randomized Smoothing: An Efficient Defense Against Backdoor Attacks
FRS targets backdoor triggers with MCTS-guided randomization and parameter smoothing, claiming a larger certified robustness radius that its own theory does not actually prove.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.