REVIEW 2 cited by
Mapping Spaces for DG Hopf Cooperads and Homotopy Automorphisms of the Rationalization of $E_n$-operads
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We define a simplicial enrichment on the category of differential graded Hopf cooperads (the category of dg Hopf cooperads for short). We prove that our simplicial enrichment satisfies, in part, the axioms of a simplicial model category structure on the category of dg Hopf cooperads. We use this simplicial model structure to define a model of mapping spaces in the category of dg Hopf cooperads and to upgrade results of the literature about the homotopy automorphism spaces of dg Hopf cooperads by dealing with simplicial monoid structures. The rational homotopy theory of operads implies that the homotopy automorphism spaces of dg Hopf cooperads can be regarded as models for the homotopy automorphism spaces of the rationalization of operads in topological spaces (or in simplicial sets). We prove, as a main application, that the spaces of Maurer--Cartan forms on the Kontsevich graph complex Lie algebras are homotopy equivalent, in the category of simplicial monoids, to the homotopy automorphism spaces of the rationalization of the operads of little discs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The oriented graph complex revisited
For any integer d, the Kontsevich graph complex GC^2_d and the oriented graph complex OGC^2_{d+1} are connected by a zigzag of quasi-isomorphisms of dg Lie algebras.
-
Rational homotopy theory of operad modules through colored operads
The rational homotopy theory of operads is extended to operadic bimodules, left/right modules, and infinitesimal bimodules via colored operads, with Quillen adjunctions and comparison to Sullivan forms.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.