Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Note On Operator-Level Query Execution Cost Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.04410 v1 pith:NYMS65MM submitted 2020-03-09 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords costmodelingexecutionoperator-levelqueryframeworktechniquesexternal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

External query execution cost modeling using query execution feedback has found its way in various database applications such as admission control and query scheduling. Existing techniques in general fall into two categories, plan-level cost modeling and operator-level cost modeling. It has been shown in the literature that operator-level cost modeling can often significantly outperform plan-level cost modeling. In this paper, we study operator-level cost modeling from a robustness perspective. We address two main challenges in practice regarding limited execution feedback (for certain operators) and mixed cost estimates due to the use of multiple cost modeling techniques. We propose a framework that deals with these issues and present a comprehensive analysis of this framework. We further provide a case study to demonstrate the efficacy of our framework in the context of index tuning, which is itself a new application of external cost modeling techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DBMS-LLM Integration Strategies in Industrial and Business Applications: Current Status and Future Challenges

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a taxonomy of five DBMS-LLM integration strategies (DB-first, LLM-first, middle-layer, pipe-connected, platform-based) and outlines open challenges.

Pith tools