REVIEW 1 cited by
Adversarial Attacks on Monocular Depth Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances of deep learning have brought exceptional performance on many computer vision tasks such as semantic segmentation and depth estimation. However, the vulnerability of deep neural networks towards adversarial examples have caused grave concerns for real-world deployment. In this paper, we present to the best of our knowledge the first systematic study of adversarial attacks on monocular depth estimation, an important task of 3D scene understanding in scenarios such as autonomous driving and robot navigation. In order to understand the impact of adversarial attacks on depth estimation, we first define a taxonomy of different attack scenarios for depth estimation, including non-targeted attacks, targeted attacks and universal attacks. We then adapt several state-of-the-art attack methods for classification on the field of depth estimation. Besides, multi-task attacks are introduced to further improve the attack performance for universal attacks. Experimental results show that it is possible to generate significant errors on depth estimation. In particular, we demonstrate that our methods can conduct targeted attacks on given objects (such as a car), resulting in depth estimation 3-4x away from the ground truth (e.g., from 20m to 80m).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BadDepth: Backdoor Attacks Against Monocular Depth Estimation in the Physical World
BadDepth uses poisoned depth labels and physical-world image augmentation to make a triggered object vanish from monocular depth predictions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.