Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

On the convergence of physics informed neural networks for linear second-order elliptic and parabolic type PDEs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.01806 v2 pith:JM46SQSF submitted 2020-04-03 math.NA cs.LGcs.NA

classification math.NAcs.LGcs.NA
keywords neuralpdespinnssequencedataminimizersnetworkssolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) are deep learning based techniques for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) encounted in computational science and engineering. Guided by data and physical laws, PINNs find a neural network that approximates the solution to a system of PDEs. Such a neural network is obtained by minimizing a loss function in which any prior knowledge of PDEs and data are encoded. Despite its remarkable empirical success in one, two or three dimensional problems, there is little theoretical justification for PINNs. As the number of data grows, PINNs generate a sequence of minimizers which correspond to a sequence of neural networks. We want to answer the question: Does the sequence of minimizers converge to the solution to the PDE? We consider two classes of PDEs: linear second-order elliptic and parabolic. By adapting the Schauder approach and the maximum principle, we show that the sequence of minimizers strongly converges to the PDE solution in $C^0$. Furthermore, we show that if each minimizer satisfies the initial/boundary conditions, the convergence mode becomes $H^1$. Computational examples are provided to illustrate our theoretical findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first theoretical work that shows the consistency of PINNs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty-aware damage identification in short-span bridges via physics-informed variational autoencoder

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A PI-GCVAE with a differentiable eigenvalue decoder and Gaussian-copula latents recovers true stiffness posteriors on noisy synthetic short-span bridge data at ~79% 95%-coverage.

  2. Structure-Informed Deep Reinforcement Learning for Inventory Management

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generic DirectBackprop deep RL policy, trained only on historical demand across many products, matches or beats classical inventory heuristics in five problem settings, and structural monotonicity penalties improve ...

  3. S-shaped Utility Maximization with VaR Constraint and Partial Information

    q-fin.MF 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a two-state unobservable stock drift, the VaR-constrained S-shaped utility problem admits a unique optimum above a critical wealth level, a limiting solution at that level, and no solution below it.

  4. BridgeNet: A Hybrid, Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Solving High-Dimensional Fokker-Planck Equations

    physics.comp-ph 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A hybrid CNN-PINN framework for Fokker-Planck equations is proposed, but the reported accuracy rests on incorrect exact solutions and test-set-tuned hyperparameters.

Pith tools