Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BuGL -- A Cross-Language Dataset for Bug Localization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.08846 v1 pith:3OISSYMJ submitted 2020-04-19 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords datasetlocalizationbuglprojectsjavaapproachescross-languageinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Bug Localization is the process of locating potential error-prone files or methods from a given bug report and source code. There is extensive research on bug localization in the literature that focuses on applying information retrieval techniques or machine learning/deep learning approaches or both, to detect location of bugs. The common premise for all approaches is the availability of a good dataset, which in this case, is the standard benchmark dataset that comprises of 6 Java projects and in some cases, more than 6 Java projects. The existing dataset do not comprise projects of other programming languages, despite of the need to investigate specific and cross project bug localization. To the best of our knowledge, we are not aware of any dataset that addresses this concern. In this paper, we present BuGL, a large-scale cross-language dataset. BuGL constitutes of more than 10,000 bug reports drawn from open-source projects written in four programming languages, namely C, C++, Java, and Python. The dataset consists of information which includes Bug Reports and Pull-Requests. BuGL aims to unfold new research opportunities in the area of bug localization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gotta catch 'em all! Towards File Localisation from Issues at Large

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across seven projects and all issue types, BM25 beats TF-IDF, LSI, and the bug-specific rVSM, which performs worst.

Pith tools