REVIEW 1 cited by
BuGL -- A Cross-Language Dataset for Bug Localization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Bug Localization is the process of locating potential error-prone files or methods from a given bug report and source code. There is extensive research on bug localization in the literature that focuses on applying information retrieval techniques or machine learning/deep learning approaches or both, to detect location of bugs. The common premise for all approaches is the availability of a good dataset, which in this case, is the standard benchmark dataset that comprises of 6 Java projects and in some cases, more than 6 Java projects. The existing dataset do not comprise projects of other programming languages, despite of the need to investigate specific and cross project bug localization. To the best of our knowledge, we are not aware of any dataset that addresses this concern. In this paper, we present BuGL, a large-scale cross-language dataset. BuGL constitutes of more than 10,000 bug reports drawn from open-source projects written in four programming languages, namely C, C++, Java, and Python. The dataset consists of information which includes Bug Reports and Pull-Requests. BuGL aims to unfold new research opportunities in the area of bug localization.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Gotta catch 'em all! Towards File Localisation from Issues at Large
Across seven projects and all issue types, BM25 beats TF-IDF, LSI, and the bug-specific rVSM, which performs worst.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.