Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Noising and Denoising

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.10150 v1 pith:OUPAR2A3 submitted 2020-04-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelreviewssummarizationabstractiveavailablecontaininginputlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The supervised training of high-capacity models on large datasets containing hundreds of thousands of document-summary pairs is critical to the recent success of deep learning techniques for abstractive summarization. Unfortunately, in most domains (other than news) such training data is not available and cannot be easily sourced. In this paper we enable the use of supervised learning for the setting where there are only documents available (e.g.,~product or business reviews) without ground truth summaries. We create a synthetic dataset from a corpus of user reviews by sampling a review, pretending it is a summary, and generating noisy versions thereof which we treat as pseudo-review input. We introduce several linguistically motivated noise generation functions and a summarization model which learns to denoise the input and generate the original review. At test time, the model accepts genuine reviews and generates a summary containing salient opinions, treating those that do not reach consensus as noise. Extensive automatic and human evaluation shows that our model brings substantial improvements over both abstractive and extractive baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMs as Architects and Critics for Multi-Source Opinion Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark and prompt framework for generating and automatically evaluating product summaries that blend customer reviews with product metadata, with the best evaluator reaching 0.74 average Spearman correlation ...

Pith tools