Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DQI: Measuring Data Quality in NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.00816 v1 pith:YOCCY3EI submitted 2020-05-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dataqualityperformancecreationcreatorsdatasetdatasetsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural language models have achieved human level performance across several NLP datasets. However, recent studies have shown that these models are not truly learning the desired task; rather, their high performance is attributed to overfitting using spurious biases, which suggests that the capabilities of AI systems have been over-estimated. We introduce a generic formula for Data Quality Index (DQI) to help dataset creators create datasets free of such unwanted biases. We evaluate this formula using a recently proposed approach for adversarial filtering, AFLite. We propose a new data creation paradigm using DQI to create higher quality data. The data creation paradigm consists of several data visualizations to help data creators (i) understand the quality of data and (ii) visualize the impact of the created data instance on the overall quality. It also has a couple of automation methods to (i) assist data creators and (ii) make the model more robust to adversarial attacks. We use DQI along with these automation methods to renovate biased examples in SNLI. We show that models trained on the renovated SNLI dataset generalize better to out of distribution tasks. Renovation results in reduced model performance, exposing a large gap with respect to human performance. DQI systematically helps in creating harder benchmarks using active learning. Our work takes the process of dynamic dataset creation forward, wherein datasets evolve together with the evolving state of the art, therefore serving as a means of benchmarking the true progress of AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measuring Diversity in Synthetic Datasets

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DCScore measures dataset diversity as the sum of self-classification probabilities under a softmax similarity matrix, and the paper shows it tracks generation temperature, human judgment, and LLM rankings.

  2. Towards Better Instruction Following Retrieval Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new training corpus and embedding model improve instruction-following p-MRR by up to 9 points on FollowIR, MAIR, and Bright benchmarks.

Pith tools