Pith. sign in

REVIEW

$(1+\varepsilon)$-moments suffice to characterise the GFF

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.02349 v2 pith:EGS4KMVX submitted 2020-05-05 math.PR

classification math.PR
keywords fieldaveragesdomainfreemomentsvarepsilonalphaarticle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We show that there is "no stable free field of index $\alpha\in (1,2)$", in the following sense. It was proved in a previous work by the authors, that subject to a \emph{fourth moment assumption}, any random generalised function on a domain $D$ of the plane, satisfying conformal invariance and a natural domain Markov property, must be a constant multiple of the Gaussian free field. In this article we show that the existence of $(1+\varepsilon)$-moments is sufficient for the same conclusion. A key idea is a new way of exploring the field, where (instead of looking at the more standard circle averages) we start from the boundary and discover averages of the field with respect to a certain "hitting density" of It\^o excursions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools