REVIEW 1 cited by
Contra-*: Mechanisms for Countering Spam Attacks on Blockchain's Memory Pools
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Blockchain-based cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, have seen on the rise in their popularity and value, making them a target to several forms of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, and calling for a better understanding of their attack surface from both security and distributed systems standpoints. In this paper, and in the pursuit of understanding the attack surface of blockchains, we explore a new form of attack that can be carried out on the memory pools (mempools) and mainly targets blockchain-based cryptocurrencies. We study this attack on Bitcoin mempool and explore the attack effects on transactions fee paid by benign users. To counter this attack, this paper further proposes Contra-*:, a set of countermeasures utilizing fee, age, and size (thus, Contra-F, Contra-A, and Contra-S) as prioritization mechanisms. Contra-*: optimize the mempool size and help in countering the effects of DoS attacks due to spam transactions. We evaluate Contra-* by simulations and analyze their effectiveness under various attack conditions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Neonpool: Reimagining cryptocurrency transaction pools for lightweight clients and IoT devices
Neonpool shows Bloom filters can shrink transaction pool memory by roughly 200x, but its 99.99% accuracy claim ignores false negatives and the Bitcoin design cannot answer transaction data requests.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.