REVIEW 5 cited by
Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has experienced a significant growth over the last few years. This is due to the widespread application of machine learning, particularly deep learning, that has led to the development of highly accurate models but lack explainability and interpretability. A plethora of methods to tackle this problem have been proposed, developed and tested. This systematic review contributes to the body of knowledge by clustering these methods with a hierarchical classification system with four main clusters: review articles, theories and notions, methods and their evaluation. It also summarises the state-of-the-art in XAI and recommends future research directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Are machine learning interpretations reliable? A stability study on global interpretations
Popular machine learning interpretation methods are frequently unstable under small data perturbations, and interpretation stability does not track prediction accuracy.
-
Interpretable by Design: MH-AutoML for Transparent and Efficient Android Malware Detection without Compromising Performance
MH-AutoML is a domain-specific AutoML framework for Android malware detection that combines automated modeling with built-in interpretability, and its evaluation shows competitive recall and higher transparency scores...
-
Explainability Methods for Hardware Trojan Detection: A Systematic Comparison
Compares domain-aware, case-based, and feature attribution explainability methods for gate-level hardware Trojan detection on the Trust-Hub benchmark dataset.
-
Human-Centered Explainability in Interactive Information Systems: A Survey
A systematic review of 100 empirical user studies synthesizes explainability research into five conceptual dimensions, a design classification, and six measurement categories.
-
Sampling Preferences Yields Simple Trustworthiness Scores
Preference sampling counts how often each large language model wins under randomly sampled user preference weightings and uses that share as a scalar trustworthiness score.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.