REVIEW 2 cited by
Rethinking Assumptions in Deep Anomaly Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Though anomaly detection (AD) can be viewed as a classification problem (nominal vs. anomalous) it is usually treated in an unsupervised manner since one typically does not have access to, or it is infeasible to utilize, a dataset that sufficiently characterizes what it means to be "anomalous." In this paper we present results demonstrating that this intuition surprisingly seems not to extend to deep AD on images. For a recent AD benchmark on ImageNet, classifiers trained to discern between normal samples and just a few (64) random natural images are able to outperform the current state of the art in deep AD. Experimentally we discover that the multiscale structure of image data makes example anomalies exceptionally informative.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
INP-Former++: Advancing Universal Anomaly Detection via Intrinsic Normal Prototypes and Residual Learning
INP-Former++ detects image defects by extracting intrinsic normal prototypes from the test image itself and reconstructing only normal regions, achieving state-of-the-art results across single-class, multi-class, few-...
-
CAPMix: Robust KPI Anomaly Detection for AIOps in Noisy and Dynamic Environments
CAPMix combines CutAddPaste anomaly injection, DTW-based label revision, and dual-space mixup to improve time-series anomaly detection, reporting gains over prior methods on five benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.