REVIEW 1 cited by
Surprisal-Triggered Conditional Computation with Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Autoregressive neural network models have been used successfully for sequence generation, feature extraction, and hypothesis scoring. This paper presents yet another use for these models: allocating more computation to more difficult inputs. In our model, an autoregressive model is used both to extract features and to predict observations in a stream of input observations. The surprisal of the input, measured as the negative log-likelihood of the current observation according to the autoregressive model, is used as a measure of input difficulty. This in turn determines whether a small, fast network, or a big, slow network, is used. Experiments on two speech recognition tasks show that our model can match the performance of a baseline in which the big network is always used with 15% fewer FLOPs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When to Plan: Learning to Select Between Reactive Control and Deliberative Planning
An RL-trained meta-policy that uses ensemble uncertainty to choose between a cheap reactive policy and costly planning reaches goals faster than fixed baselines and adapts as the reactive policy improves.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.