Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Study of Compositional Generalization in Neural Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.09437 v2 pith:IIKJZZS4 submitted 2020-06-16 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords compositionalmodelsrelationalneuralconceptsgeneralizeargumentschains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Compositional and relational learning is a hallmark of human intelligence, but one which presents challenges for neural models. One difficulty in the development of such models is the lack of benchmarks with clear compositional and relational task structure on which to systematically evaluate them. In this paper, we introduce an environment called ConceptWorld, which enables the generation of images from compositional and relational concepts, defined using a logical domain specific language. We use it to generate images for a variety of compositional structures: 2x2 squares, pentominoes, sequences, scenes involving these objects, and other more complex concepts. We perform experiments to test the ability of standard neural architectures to generalize on relations with compositional arguments as the compositional depth of those arguments increases and under substitution. We compare standard neural networks such as MLP, CNN and ResNet, as well as state-of-the-art relational networks including WReN and PrediNet in a multi-class image classification setting. For simple problems, all models generalize well to close concepts but struggle with longer compositional chains. For more complex tests involving substitutivity, all models struggle, even with short chains. In highlighting these difficulties and providing an environment for further experimentation, we hope to encourage the development of models which are able to generalize effectively in compositional, relational domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: Theory of Mind Benchmarks are Broken for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes that LLM theory-of-mind evaluation should measure functional adaptation to partners, not just literal prediction of their behavior, and shows the two can diverge sharply in simple games.

  2. Enabling Realtime Reinforcement Learning at Scale with Staggered Asynchronous Inference

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Staggered asynchronous inference lets reinforcement learning agents with large, slow models act at every time step in realtime environments, at the cost of delay regret that grows with environment stochasticity.

Pith tools