REVIEW 3 cited by
Monash University, UEA, UCR Time Series Extrinsic Regression Archive
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Time series research has gathered lots of interests in the last decade, especially for Time Series Classification (TSC) and Time Series Forecasting (TSF). Research in TSC has greatly benefited from the University of California Riverside and University of East Anglia (UCR/UEA) Time Series Archives. On the other hand, the advancement in Time Series Forecasting relies on time series forecasting competitions such as the Makridakis competitions, NN3 and NN5 Neural Network competitions, and a few Kaggle competitions. Each year, thousands of papers proposing new algorithms for TSC and TSF have utilized these benchmarking archives. These algorithms are designed for these specific problems, but may not be useful for tasks such as predicting the heart rate of a person using photoplethysmogram (PPG) and accelerometer data. We refer to this problem as Time Series Extrinsic Regression (TSER), where we are interested in a more general methodology of predicting a single continuous value, from univariate or multivariate time series. This prediction can be from the same time series or not directly related to the predictor time series and does not necessarily need to be a future value or depend heavily on recent values. To the best of our knowledge, research into TSER has received much less attention in the time series research community and there are no models developed for general time series extrinsic regression problems. Most models are developed for a specific problem. Therefore, we aim to motivate and support the research into TSER by introducing the first TSER benchmarking archive. This archive contains 19 datasets from different domains, with varying number of dimensions, unequal length dimensions, and missing values. In this paper, we introduce the datasets in this archive and did an initial benchmark on existing models.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Statistical comparisons of time-series feature sets on classification tasks
Across 124 time-series classification datasets, six open-source feature sets perform mostly equivalently, with tsfresh winning most often and simple quantile/FFT baselines competitive on several problems.
-
A Standardized Benchmark for Skeleton-Based Rehabilitation Assessment Using Deep Learning
Rehab-Pile, a standardized archive of 60 rehabilitation skeleton datasets with reproducible baselines, reports that the authors' lightweight LITEMV model wins on efficiency and usually on accuracy.
-
Enhancing Irregular Time Series Forecasting with Continuous-Time Modeling Framework
WrapFlow combines continuous-time event/gap tokenization with simulation-free residual flow matching on a Transformer to improve irregular multivariate time-series forecasting.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.