Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Alleviating Over-segmentation Errors by Detecting Action Boundaries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.06866 v1 pith:JBVYR2JQ submitted 2020-07-14 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords actionframeworksegmentationtemporalboundariesboundaryproposeasrf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an effective framework for the temporal action segmentation task, namely an Action Segment Refinement Framework (ASRF). Our model architecture consists of a long-term feature extractor and two branches: the Action Segmentation Branch (ASB) and the Boundary Regression Branch (BRB). The long-term feature extractor provides shared features for the two branches with a wide temporal receptive field. The ASB classifies video frames with action classes, while the BRB regresses the action boundary probabilities. The action boundaries predicted by the BRB refine the output from the ASB, which results in a significant performance improvement. Our contributions are three-fold: (i) We propose a framework for temporal action segmentation, the ASRF, which divides temporal action segmentation into frame-wise action classification and action boundary regression. Our framework refines frame-level hypotheses of action classes using predicted action boundaries. (ii) We propose a loss function for smoothing the transition of action probabilities, and analyze combinations of various loss functions for temporal action segmentation. (iii) Our framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods on three challenging datasets, offering an improvement of up to 13.7% in terms of segmental edit distance and up to 16.1% in terms of segmental F1 score. Our code will be publicly available soon.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Focus on What Matters: Constraining Spatial-Temporal Attention via Action-Units for Noise-Resilient AQA

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pose-guided, multi-level parsing framework achieves state-of-the-art diving action-quality scores (Spearman ρ=0.9465, Rℓ2=0.2243 on FineDiving) by filtering inputs to pose-derived action units and decoupling motion ...

Pith tools