Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimal STEM Convergence Angle Selection using a Convolutional Neural Network and the Strehl Ratio

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.12281 v1 pith:LYE3COGT submitted 2020-07-23 physics.data-an

classification physics.data-an
keywords convergenceangleratiostrehlassessmentelectronnetworkoptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Selection of the correct convergence angle is essential for achieving the highest resolution imaging in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Use of poor heuristics, such as Rayleigh's quarter-phase rule, to assess probe quality and uncertainties in measurement of the aberration function result in incorrect selection of convergence angles and lower resolution. Here, we show that the Strehl ratio provides an accurate and efficient to calculate criteria for evaluating probe size for STEM. A convolutional neural network trained on the Strehl ratio is shown to outperform experienced microscopists at selecting a convergence angle from a single electron Ronchigram using simulated datasets. Generating tens of thousands of simulated Ronchigram examples, the network is trained to select convergence angles yielding probes on average 85% nearer to optimal size at millisecond speeds (0.02% human assessment time). Qualitative assessment on experimental Ronchigrams with intentionally introduced aberrations suggests that trends in the optimal convergence angle size are well modeled but high accuracy requires extensive training datasets. This near immediate assessment of Ronchigrams using the Strehl ratio and machine learning highlights a viable path toward rapid, automated alignment of aberration-corrected electron microscopes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools