Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comprehensive Study on Deep Learning-based Methods for Sign Language Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.12530 v2 pith:7FVTDTXZ submitted 2020-07-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords languagesignrecognitionmethodsdatasetdeepvideoannotations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, a comparative experimental assessment of computer vision-based methods for sign language recognition is conducted. By implementing the most recent deep neural network methods in this field, a thorough evaluation on multiple publicly available datasets is performed. The aim of the present study is to provide insights on sign language recognition, focusing on mapping non-segmented video streams to glosses. For this task, two new sequence training criteria, known from the fields of speech and scene text recognition, are introduced. Furthermore, a plethora of pretraining schemes is thoroughly discussed. Finally, a new RGB+D dataset for the Greek sign language is created. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first sign language dataset where sentence and gloss level annotations are provided for a video capture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Neural Spoken Language Recognition: An Exploration with Multilingual Datasets

    cs.SD 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A funnel-shaped TDNN plus 1x1 layers is reported to reach 97% language identification accuracy on ten Common Voice languages, but the evaluation is insufficient to support the claim.

Pith tools