Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Unacceptable, where is my privacy? Exploring Accidental Triggers of Smart Speakers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.00508 v1 pith:YQUCRNAI submitted 2020-08-02 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords triggersaccidentalprivacyspeakerslikesmartsoundsvoice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Voice assistants like Amazon's Alexa, Google's Assistant, or Apple's Siri, have become the primary (voice) interface in smart speakers that can be found in millions of households. For privacy reasons, these speakers analyze every sound in their environment for their respective wake word like ''Alexa'' or ''Hey Siri,'' before uploading the audio stream to the cloud for further processing. Previous work reported on the inaccurate wake word detection, which can be tricked using similar words or sounds like ''cocaine noodles'' instead of ''OK Google.'' In this paper, we perform a comprehensive analysis of such accidental triggers, i.,e., sounds that should not have triggered the voice assistant, but did. More specifically, we automate the process of finding accidental triggers and measure their prevalence across 11 smart speakers from 8 different manufacturers using everyday media such as TV shows, news, and other kinds of audio datasets. To systematically detect accidental triggers, we describe a method to artificially craft such triggers using a pronouncing dictionary and a weighted, phone-based Levenshtein distance. In total, we have found hundreds of accidental triggers. Moreover, we explore potential gender and language biases and analyze the reproducibility. Finally, we discuss the resulting privacy implications of accidental triggers and explore countermeasures to reduce and limit their impact on users' privacy. To foster additional research on these sounds that mislead machine learning models, we publish a dataset of more than 1000 verified triggers as a research artifact.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Process of Categorical Clipping at the Core of the Genesis of Concepts in Synthetic Neural Cognition

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Words that strongly activate both a lower-layer neuron and its strongly connected upper-layer neuron in GPT-2XL form more semantically similar clusters, which the paper interprets as a clipping process.

  2. How Do Artificial Intelligences Think? The Three Mathematico-Cognitive Factors of Categorical Segmentation Operated by Synthetic Neurons

    q-bio.NC 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper names three components of a neuron's aggregation function as cognitive factors and reports near-unity correlations in GPT-2XL, but the effects are largely true by construction.

Pith tools