pith. sign in

arxiv: 2008.10625 · v5 · submitted 2020-08-24 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Lectures on Naturalness, String Landscape and Multiverse

Arthur Hebecker This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 14:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords string landscapemultiversenaturalnesscosmological constantelectroweak hierarchystring compactificationsvacua selection
0
0 comments X

The pith

String theory landscape supplies many vacua whose parameters can match observed values through multiverse selection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The notes introduce string compactifications and the resulting landscape of low-energy theories as a framework that can accommodate the small cosmological constant and the electroweak scale. A reader would care because conventional effective field theory offers no explanation for why these quantities take the values they do rather than vastly different ones. The text supplies the minimal string theory background needed to follow how an exponentially large number of vacua arises and how a multiverse populated by these vacua can turn apparent fine-tuning into a selection effect.

Core claim

The string landscape of vacua, generated by different compactifications and fluxes, contains solutions with a wide range of low-energy parameters; when combined with a multiverse picture, this set of solutions supplies partial answers to why the cosmological constant is small and why the electroweak scale sits far below the Planck scale.

What carries the argument

The string landscape, defined as the collection of possible four-dimensional effective field theories obtained from string theory compactifications on different manifolds with different fluxes and branes.

If this is right

  • Parameters such as the cosmological constant become environmental rather than fundamental inputs.
  • Anthropic selection within the multiverse replaces conventional naturalness criteria for certain quantities.
  • Technical control over moduli stabilization and flux discretuum remains necessary to make quantitative predictions.
  • The measure problem on the space of vacua must be resolved before statistical predictions can be extracted.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the landscape picture holds, searches for new physics motivated by naturalness may be misdirected.
  • Observable signatures of other vacua, such as variations in fundamental constants, would become a direct test.
  • Swampland constraints on effective field theories could shrink the allowed landscape and alter the viability of the explanation.

Load-bearing premise

A sufficiently dense and controllable set of string vacua exists that includes solutions reproducing the observed cosmological constant and Higgs mass.

What would settle it

An explicit enumeration or statistical argument demonstrating that no string vacuum reproduces both the observed vacuum energy density and the electroweak scale simultaneously.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2008.10625 by Arthur Hebecker.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: One-loop fermion self energy in the Yukawa theory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Contributions to the Higgs self energy. Thus, cH is an O(1) number and if we set Λ = 1 TeV, only an O(1) cancellation between the two terms on the r.h. side of (1.52) is required to get the right Higgs mass parameter of the order of (100 GeV)2 . Things are actually a bit worse since there is a color factor of 3 coming with the top and other numerical factors. But, much more importantly, we can not simply d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Tree level and loop effect of the cosmological constant term on the metric field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scattering amplitude interpretation of the expectation value of the axial current. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Commuting diagram demonstrating the equivalence of two representations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: One-loop running of inverse gauge couplings in the Standard Model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Point particle scattering vs. string scattering. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: String moving through target space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Point particle through target space. In complete analogy to the point particle, the Nambu-Goto action for the bosonic string measures the surface area of the worldsheet embedded in target space: SNG = −T Z Σ df . (3.4) To write this more explicitly, one parametrises the worldsheet by (cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The cylinder, on which the Xµ field theory lives, viewed as a strip with periodic boundary conditions. In this picture, X µ L and X µ R correspond to left and right-moving waves. being further constrained by Xµ (τ, σ) = Xµ (τ, σ + π), cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p081_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Open string. The variation of the action, δS = 1 2πα0 Z d 2σ (∂ 2X) · δX − 1 2πα0 Z dτ Z π 0 dσ ∂σ(∂σX · δX), (3.35) now includes boundary terms. Indeed, while the first term vanishes if the equations of motion are obeyed, the second gives − 1 2πα0 Z dτ (∂σX µ ) · δXµ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Open string living on a D1-brane filling out the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Various brane configurations with strings attached. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Illustration of a conformal mapping of a given field configuration to a new one. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: String propagation mapped to the z-plane. The part of the cylinder between initial time τi and final time τf corresponds to the annulus (ring) between ri and rf . Next, let us recall that a state in a 4d QFT may, analogously to the Schr¨odinger wave function of quantum mechanics, be described by a Schr¨odinger wave functional, Ψ : φ 7→ Ψ[φ, t] ∈ C . (4.2) Here φ : x 7→ φ(t, x) ∈ R is a field configuration… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Identification of non-compact worldsheets describing string propagation (left) or scat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p103_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Illustration of the intuitive meaning of modular invariance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: In principle, branch cuts can arise in the correlation function between two vertex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Illustration of M-theory and its perturbative corners: the 5 superstring theories and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p116_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: A torus deformed to a ‘pancake’ with a handle attached. The handle is realised by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p121_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Some simple submanifolds and their boundaries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p135_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Representatives of the four linearly independent homology classes in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p135_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: A visualisation attempt of how J and Ω move in the spaces H2 (X) and (the com￾plexification of) H3 (X), thereby determining the metric on a Calabi-Yau manifold. Of course, the dimensions of these spaces are in general much higher than three. For the subset Ui of all equivalence classes in which z i 6= 0, a chart is provided by φi : { class of (z 0 , · · · , zn ) } 7→  z 0 z i , · · · , z i−1 z i , z i+1 … view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Torus defined as C/Z 2 . Now, in analogy to the proper Calabi-Yau case, the complex structure can be defined using the position of Ω in the complexification of H1 (T 2 ). For this, it is sufficient to know the periods, i.e. the integrals of Ω over the integral 1-cycles: Π1 = Z y= const. Ω = Z 1 0 α dx = α , Π2 = Z x= const. Ω = Z 1 0 α τ dy = ατ . (5.88) They can be combined in the period vector Π = (Π1, … view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Intuitive illustration of how in the procedure of modding out a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p149_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Instantons as localised lumps of field strength (figure adapted from [198]). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p159_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Effective instanton arising from a particle-antiparticle fluctuation wrapping the com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p159_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Bubble nucleation in a 4d-to-3d toy model with 1-form flux. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p161_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Flux discretuum of a 3-form gauge theory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p162_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: Flux discretuum of a 3-form gauge theory with two fields. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p162_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: An E3-brane instanton, corresponding to a euclidean D3 brane wrapped on a 4-cycle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p167_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: Qualitative behaviour of the scalar potential arising after the inclusion of instanton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p169_33.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: Uplifting to a KKLT dS vacuum. One may expect that in the huge string theory landscape many options for such an uplift exist. Yet, it turns out not to be easy to construct an uplift of the above O’Raifeartaigh type explicitly. Thus, the most explicit uplift has a somewhat different structure: It is the anti-D3- brane uplift originally suggested by KKLT, which arguably remains the most explicit (though nev… view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: If too high an uplift is added to a model with SUSY-AdS vacuum, no metastable de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p172_35.png] view at source ↗
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: Calabi Yau with warped throat. The Calabi-Yau is basically undeformed in the region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p173_36.png] view at source ↗
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: The distribution of e K/2W0 in the complex plane has no special feature near the origin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p178_37.png] view at source ↗
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: Distribution of the cosmological constant before and after uplift. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p178_38.png] view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: Solution: First, we have K = −n ln(T + T), KT = KT = −n T + T , KTT = n (T + T) 2 = (KTT ) −1 (6.83) and hence V (T, T) = e K(KTT |KT W0| 2 − 3|W0| 2 ) = e K|W0| 2 (n − 3). (6.84) We see that for n = 3 the potential vanishes identically, implying that T remains a modulus in spite of W 6= 0. This is the simplest form of the famous no-scale cancellation. Now consider the multi-variable case, with K = − ln f… view at source ↗
Figure 39
Figure 39. Figure 39: Slow-roll inflation ending in field oscillations and reheating. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p188_39.png] view at source ↗
Figure 40
Figure 40. Figure 40: A simple visualisation of the landscape over a 1-dimensional moduli space. Some [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p192_40.png] view at source ↗
Figure 41
Figure 41. Figure 41: Nucleation and speed-of-light expansion of bubbles in a ‘background’ dS vacuum. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p192_41.png] view at source ↗
Figure 42
Figure 42. Figure 42: Degenerate double well potential in quantum mechanics and the corresponding in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p194_42.png] view at source ↗
Figure 43
Figure 43. Figure 43: Classical solution of the euclidean theory, which corresponds to a solution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p195_43.png] view at source ↗
Figure 44
Figure 44. Figure 44: On the left: Quantum mechanical potential allowing for a decay of a potentially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p196_44.png] view at source ↗
Figure 45
Figure 45. Figure 45: Scalar-field double well potential with false vacuum at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p197_45.png] view at source ↗
Figure 46
Figure 46. Figure 46: On the left: Sketch of the field-theoretic bounce where a ball of the final-state vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p200_46.png] view at source ↗
Figure 47
Figure 47. Figure 47: Tunnelling to our vacuum, where a period of slow-roll inflation, reheating and structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p204_47.png] view at source ↗
Figure 48
Figure 48. Figure 48: Various ‘surfaces of constant energy density’ following the initial tunnelling transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p205_48.png] view at source ↗
Figure 49
Figure 49. Figure 49: On the left: Penrose diagram of de Sitter space. Here the spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p207_49.png] view at source ↗
Figure 50
Figure 50. Figure 50: Relaxion potential (adapted from [394]). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p223_50.png] view at source ↗
Figure 51
Figure 51. Figure 51: On the left: String landscape discretuum filling out the whole 2-dimensional plane of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p225_51.png] view at source ↗
Figure 52
Figure 52. Figure 52: Left: The sum of two simple falling potential terms allows only for AdS, not for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p229_52.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The cosmological constant and electroweak hierarchy problem have been a great inspiration for research. Nevertheless, the resolution of these two naturalness problems remains mysterious from the perspective of a low-energy effective field theorist. The string theory landscape and a possible string-based multiverse offer partial answers, but they are also controversial for both technical and conceptual reasons. The present lecture notes, suitable for a one-semester course or for self-study, attempt to provide a technical introduction to these subjects. They are aimed at graduate students and researchers with a solid background in quantum field theory and general relativity who would like to understand the string landscape and its relation to hierarchy problems and naturalness at a reasonably technical level. Necessary basics of string theory are introduced as part of the course. This text will also benefit graduate students who are in the process of studying string theory at a deeper level. In this case, the present notes may serve as additional reading beyond a formal string theory course.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript consists of lecture notes providing a technical introduction to the string theory landscape and multiverse, surveying their potential partial resolutions to the cosmological constant and electroweak hierarchy problems. Aimed at graduate students with QFT and GR backgrounds, the notes introduce necessary string theory elements and discuss technical and conceptual controversies without advancing new derivations or predictions.

Significance. If the presentation of standard material and controversies is accurate, the notes offer a useful expository resource for bridging formal string theory courses with applications to naturalness questions. The work's value lies in its survey of existing arguments rather than novel claims, with no machine-checked proofs or falsifiable predictions to credit.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the notes are suitable for a one-semester course; the introduction could benefit from an explicit outline of lecture topics or suggested pacing to aid self-study users.
  2. References to prior literature on landscape constructions are mentioned but could include a consolidated table of key references by topic for easier navigation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. The notes are intended as an expository resource surveying existing arguments on the string landscape and naturalness, and we are glad this is recognized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely expository lecture notes referencing prior literature

full rationale

The paper consists of lecture notes providing a technical introduction to the string landscape and its relation to naturalness problems. It surveys existing arguments and constructions from the literature without advancing any new derivations, quantitative predictions, or first-principles results. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs, self-citations, or fitted parameters. All content is presented as exposition of prior work, making the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks with no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an expository work with no new theoretical claims, so the ledger contains no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced by the author.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 993 out tokens · 25310 ms · 2026-05-24T14:58:27.513997+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fine-Tuning Small Reasoning Models for Quantum Field Theory

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Small 7B reasoning models were fine-tuned on synthetic and curated QFT problems using RL and SFT, yielding performance gains, error analysis, and public release of data and traces.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 157 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory,

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, “An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory,” Westview Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    General Relativity,

    R. M. Wald, “General Relativity,” The University of Chicago Press, 1984

    work page 1984

  3. [3]

    Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics

    T. Cheng and L. Li, “Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics” and “Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics – Problems and Solutions”, Oxford University Press, 1984 and 2000, respectively

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Dynamics of the Standard Model,

    J. Donoghue, E. Golowich and B. R. Holstein, “Dynamics of the Standard Model,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 2 (1992), 1-540

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Supersymmetry and Supergravity,

    J. Wess and J. Bagger, “Supersymmetry and Supergravity,” Princeton University Press, 1991

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    Supergravity,

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, “Supergravity,” Cambridge University Press, 2012. 242

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    String Theory

    J. Polchinski, “String Theory”, Vol. 1 and 2, Cambridge University Press, 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Basic Concepts of String Theory,

    R. Blumenhagen, D. L¨ ust and S. Theisen, “Basic Concepts of String Theory,” Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    String Theory and Particle Physics: An Introduction to String Phenomenology,

    L. E. Ibanez and A. M. Uranga, “String Theory and Particle Physics: An Introduction to String Phenomenology,” Cambridge University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Les Houches Lectures on Constructing String Vacua

    F. Denef, “Les Houches lectures on constructing string vacua,” Les Houches 87 (2008) 483 [arXiv:0803.1194]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Life at the Interface of Particle Physics and String Theory

    A. N. Schellekens, “Life at the interface of particle physics and string theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 (2013) no.4, 1491 [arXiv:1306.5083 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    The Quantum Theory of Fields

    S. Weinberg, “The Quantum Theory of Fields”, Vol. 1 and 2, Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    Quantum Field Theory,

    C. Itzykson and J. Zuber, “Quantum Field Theory,” McGraw-Hill, 1980

    work page 1980

  14. [14]

    Quantum Field Theory,

    M. Srednicki, “Quantum Field Theory,” Cambridge University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model,

    M. D. Schwartz, “Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model,” Cambridge University Press, 2014

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Nachtmann, “Elementary Particle Physics: Concepts and Phenomena, Springer, 1990

    O. Nachtmann, “Elementary Particle Physics: Concepts and Phenomena, Springer, 1990

    work page 1990

  17. [17]

    Schellekens: Beyond the Standard Model, https://www.nikhef.nl/~t58/lectures.html

    work page

  18. [18]

    Introduction to Flavour Physics and CP Violation

    M. Blanke, “Introduction to flavour physics and CP violation,” CERN Yellow Rep. School Proc. 1705 (2017) 71 [arXiv:1704.03753 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Lectures on Flavor Physics and CP Violation

    B. Grinstein, “Lectures on flavor physics and CP violation,” [arXiv:1701.06916 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Kooijman/Tuning: Lectures on CP violation, https://www.nikhef.nl/~h71/Lectures/2015/ppII-cpviolation-19032018.pdf

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    CP violation,

    I. I. Bigi and A. Sanda, “CP violation,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 9 (2009), 1-485

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Flavour Physics and CP Violation

    R. Fleischer, “Flavour physics and CP violation,” Lectures at the 2005 European School of High-Energy Physics [arXiv:hep-ph/0608010 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    CP violation,

    G. C. Branco, L. Lavoura and J. P. Silva, “CP violation,” Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. 103 (1999), 1-536

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    Can Electro-Weak $\h$-Term be Observable ?

    A. A. Anselm and A. A. Johansen, “Can electroweak theta term be observable?,” Nucl. Phys. B 412 (1994) 553 [hep-ph/9305271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Axion detection via Topological Casimir Effect

    C. Cao and A. Zhitnitsky, “Axion detection via topological Casimir effect,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.1, 015013 [arXiv:1702.00012 [hep-ph]]. 243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Effective field theory,

    H. Georgi, “Effective field theory,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43 (1993), 209-252

    work page 1993

  27. [27]

    Effective Field Theories

    A. V. Manohar, “Effective field theories,” Lect. Notes Phys. 479 (1997), 311-362 [arXiv:hep-ph/9606222 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  28. [28]

    Effective Field Theory

    A. Pich, “Effective field theory: course,” Lectures at Les Houches Summer School 1998 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806303 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  29. [29]

    2004 TASI Lectures on Supersymmetry Breaking

    M. Luty, “2004 TASI lectures on supersymmetry breaking,” hep-th/0509029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  30. [30]

    Five lectures on effective field theory

    D. B. Kaplan, “Five lectures on effective field theory,” nucl-th/0510023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    As scales become separated: Lectures on effective field theory,

    T. Cohen, “As scales become separated: Lectures on effective field theory,” PoSTASI2018 (2019), 011 [arXiv:1903.03622 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Effective Theories in Physics – From Planetary Orbits to Elementary Particle Masses

    J. D. Wells, “Effective Theories in Physics – From Planetary Orbits to Elementary Particle Masses”, Springer, 2012

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    µ → eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?,

    P. Minkowski, “µ → eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?,” Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977), 421-428

    work page 1977

  34. [34]

    Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,

    T. Yanagida, “Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos,” Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979), 95-99, KEK-79-18-95

    work page 1979

  35. [35]

    Complex Spinors and Unified Theories

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, “Complex spinors and unified theories,” Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979), 315-321 [arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  36. [36]

    Gauge symmetry hierarchies,

    E. Gildener, “Gauge symmetry hierarchies,” Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976), 1667

    work page 1976

  37. [37]

    The infrared - ultraviolet connection,

    M. Veltman, “The infrared - ultraviolet connection,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 12 (1981), 437

    work page 1981

  38. [38]

    Recent Developments in Gauge Theories. Proceedings, Nato Advanced Study Institute, Cargese, France, August 26 - September 8, 1979,

    G. ’t Hooft, C. Itzykson, A. Jaffe, H. Lehmann, P. K. Mitter, I. M. Singer and R. Stora, “Recent Developments in Gauge Theories. Proceedings, Nato Advanced Study Institute, Cargese, France, August 26 - September 8, 1979,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) pp.1

    work page 1979

  39. [39]

    Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses,

    R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, “Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses,” Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63

    work page 1988

  40. [40]

    Observables in Low-Energy Superstring Models,

    J. R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos and F. Zwirner, “Observables in Low-Energy Superstring Models,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1 (1986) 57

    work page 1986

  41. [41]

    Naturalness, Extra-Empirical Theory Assessments, and the Implications of Skepticism

    J. D. Wells, “Naturalness, Extra-Empirical Theory Assessments, and the Implications of Skepticism,” arXiv:1806.07289 and “Finetuned Cancellations and Improbable Theories,” arXiv:1809.03374

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Gauging Fine-Tuning

    F. Azhar and A. Loeb, “Gauging Fine-Tuning,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.10, 103018 [arXiv:1809.06220 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    M. Tanabashi et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Physics,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.3, 030001. 244

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Bayes Factors,

    R. E. Kass and A. E. Raftery, “Bayes Factors,” J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 90 (1995) no.430, 773-795

    work page 1995

  45. [45]

    Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology

    R. Trotta, “Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology,” Con- temp. Phys. 49 (2008), 71-104 [arXiv:0803.4089 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    Natural Priors, CMSSM Fits and LHC Weather Forecasts

    B. C. Allanach, K. Cranmer, C. G. Lester and A. M. Weber, “Natural priors, CMSSM fits and LHC weather forecasts,” JHEP 08 (2007), 023 [arXiv:0705.0487 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    Bayesian approach and Naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC

    M. E. Cabrera, J. A. Casas and R. Ruiz de Austri, “Bayesian approach and Naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC,” JHEP 03 (2009), 075 [arXiv:0812.0536 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    Quantified naturalness from Bayesian statistics

    S. Fichet, “Quantified naturalness from Bayesian statistics,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 125029 [arXiv:1204.4940 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    CMSSM, naturalness and the "fine-tuning price" of the Very Large Hadron Collider

    A. Fowlie, “CMSSM, naturalness and the ”fine-tuning price” of the Very Large Hadron Collider,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), 015010 [arXiv:1403.3407 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [50]

    Lectures on Higgs Boson Physics in the Standard Model and Beyond

    J. D. Wells, “Lectures on Higgs Boson Physics in the Standard Model and Beyond,” [arXiv:0909.4541 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Naturalness after LHC8

    G. F. Giudice, “Naturalness after LHC8,” PoS EPS-HEP2013 (2013), 163 [arXiv:1307.7879] and “The Dawn of the Post-Naturalness Era,” [arXiv:1710.07663]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Gravitation and Cosmology,

    S. Weinberg: “Gravitation and Cosmology,” John Wiley and Sons, 1972

    work page 1972

  53. [53]

    Gravitation,

    C. S. Misner, K. W. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler: “Gravitation,” Princeton University Press, 2017

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Spacetime and Geometry,

    S. M. Carroll: “Spacetime and Geometry,” Cambridge University Press, 2019

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    General Relativity,

    N. Straumann: “General Relativity,” Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Grav- itational Action,

    G. Gibbons, S. Hawking and M. Perry, “Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Grav- itational Action,” Nucl. Phys. B 138 (1978), 141-150

    work page 1978

  57. [57]

    Quantum theory of gravitation

    M. Veltman, “Quantum theory of gravitation”, in: Methods in Field Theory, Les Houches 1975, edited by R. Balian and J. Zinn-Justin (North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1976), Course 5

    work page 1975

  58. [58]

    The Cosmological Constant Problem,

    S. Weinberg, “The Cosmological Constant Problem,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989), 1-23

    work page 1989

  59. [59]

    The Cosmological Constant Problems (Talk given at Dark Matter 2000, February, 2000)

    S. Weinberg, “The Cosmological constant problems,” Talk at 4th International Symposium “Dark Matter 2000” [arXiv:astro-ph/0005265 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  60. [60]

    Cosmological Constant - the Weight of the Vacuum

    T. Padmanabhan, “Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum,” Phys. Rept. 380 (2003), 235-320 [arXiv:hep-th/0212290 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  61. [61]

    Dark Energy: Mystery of the Millennium

    T. Padmanabhan, “Dark energy: mystery of the millennium,” AIP Conf. Proc. 861 (2006) no.1, 179-196 [arXiv:astro-ph/0603114 [astro-ph]]. 245

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    Lie algebras in Particle Physics,

    H. Georgi, “Lie algebras in Particle Physics,” Front. Phys. 54 (1999), 1-320

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    Group Theory for Unified Model Building,

    R. Slansky, “Group Theory for Unified Model Building,” Phys. Rept. 79 (1981), 1-128

    work page 1981

  64. [64]

    Grand Unified Theories

    G. G. Ross, “Grand Unified Theories”, Westview Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  65. [65]

    Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings, and in branes

    P. Nath and P. Fileviez Perez, “Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes,” Phys. Rept. 441 (2007), 191-317 [arXiv:hep-ph/0601023 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  66. [66]

    Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories,

    S. Raby, “Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories,” Lect. Notes Phys. 939 (2017), 1-308

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Grand Unified Theories

    A. Hebecker and J. Hisano, “Grand Unified Theories”, Review article in Ref. [43]

    work page

  68. [68]

    GUT Physics in the era of the LHC

    D. Croon, T. E. Gonzalo, L. Graf, N. Kosnik and G. White, “GUT Physics in the era of the LHC,” Front. in Phys. 7 (2019), 76 [arXiv:1903.04977 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix,

    S. R. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix,” Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 1251

    work page 1967

  70. [70]

    All Possible Generators of Supersymmetries of the s Matrix,

    R. Haag, J. T. Lopuszanski and M. Sohnius, “All Possible Generators of Supersymmetries of the s Matrix,” Nucl. Phys. B 88 (1975) 257

    work page 1975

  71. [71]

    Introduction to Supersymmetry and Supergravity

    P. West, “Introduction to Supersymmetry and Supergravity”, World Scientific, 1990

    work page 1990

  72. [72]

    Quantum Field Theory

    S. Weinberg, “Quantum Field Theory”, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  73. [73]

    Modern Supersymmetry

    J. Terning, “Modern Supersymmetry”, Oxford University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  74. [74]

    Advanced Topics in Quantum Field Theory

    M. Shifman, “Advanced Topics in Quantum Field Theory”, Cambridge University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 70 (1974), 39-50

    work page 1974

  76. [76]

    Is the Neutrino a Goldstone Particle?,

    D. Volkov and V. Akulov, “Is the Neutrino a Goldstone Particle?,” Phys. Lett. B46 (1973), 109-110

    work page 1973

  77. [77]

    Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking for Chiral Scalar Superfields,

    L. O’Raifeartaigh, “Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking for Chiral Scalar Superfields,” Nucl. Phys. B 96 (1975), 331-352

    work page 1975

  78. [78]

    Spontaneously Broken Supergauge Symmetries and Goldstone Spinors,

    P. Fayet and J. Iliopoulos, “Spontaneously Broken Supergauge Symmetries and Goldstone Spinors,” Phys. Lett. B 51 (1974), 461-464

    work page 1974

  79. [79]

    A Supersymmetry Primer

    S. P. Martin, “A Supersymmetry primer,” Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 21 (2010) 1 [hep-ph/9709356]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [80]

    Theories with Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking

    G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, “Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking,” Phys. Rept. 322 (1999) 419 [hep-ph/9801271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

Showing first 80 references.