Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the impact of galaxy bias uncertainties on primordial non-Gaussianity constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.06622 v1 pith:ZXETCBXO submitted 2020-09-14 astro-ph.CO

On the impact of galaxy bias uncertainties on primordial non-Gaussianity constraints

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords biasconstraintsgalaxyparametrizationvalueparametersuncertaintiesanalyses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the impact that uncertainties on assumed relations between galaxy bias parameters have on constraints of the local PNG $f_{\rm NL}$ parameter. We focus on the relation between the linear density galaxy bias $b_1$ and local PNG bias $b_\phi$ in an idealized forecast setup with multitracer galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum data. We consider two parametrizations of galaxy bias: 1) one inspired by the universality relation where $b_\phi = 2\delta_c\left(b_1 - p\right)$ and $p$ is a free parameter; and 2) another in which the product of bias parameters and $f_{\rm NL}$, like $f_{\rm NL} b_\phi$, is directly fitted for. The constraints on the $f_{\rm NL}-p$ plane are markedly bimodal, and both the central value and width of marginalized constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$ depend sensitively on the priors on $p$. Assuming fixed $p=1$ in the constraints with a fiducial value of $p=0.55$ can bias the inferred $f_{\rm NL}$ by $0.5\sigma$ to $1\sigma$; priors $\Delta p \approx 0.5$ around this fiducial value are however sufficient in our setup to return unbiased constraints. In power spectrum analyses, parametrization 2, that makes no assumptions on $b_\phi$, can distinguish $f_{\rm NL} \neq 0$ with the same significance as parametrization 1 assuming perfect knowledge of $b_\phi$ (the value of $f_{\rm NL}$ is however left unknown). A drawback of parametrization 2 is that the addition of the bispectrum information is not as beneficial as in parametrization 1. Our results motivate strongly the incorporation of mitigation strategies for bias uncertainties in PNG constraint analyses, as well as further theoretical studies on the relations between bias parameters to better inform those strategies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Impact and measurability of linear relativistic effects in galaxy surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Neglecting linear GR effects biases f_NL at 1–3σ for Euclid/SPHEREx in SFB forecasts; multi-tracer improves Doppler detection and weakly breaks b_ϕ f_NL degeneracy.

  2. How I stop worrying about non-universality and $b_\phi$: Constraining local $f_{\rm NL}$ with $b_\phi$ priors from HOD posteriors

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Constructs b_phi priors from HOD posteriors on DESI EDR data to recover unbiased f_NL even with assembly bias.