REVIEW 2 cited by
Landscape of R packages for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The growing availability of data and computing power fuels the development of predictive models. In order to ensure the safe and effective functioning of such models, we need methods for exploration, debugging, and validation. New methods and tools for this purpose are being developed within the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) subdomain of machine learning. In this work (1) we present the taxonomy of methods for model explanations, (2) we identify and compare 27 packages available in R to perform XAI analysis, (3) we present an example of an application of particular packages, (4) we acknowledge recent trends in XAI. The article is primarily devoted to the tools available in R, but since it is easy to integrate the Python code, we will also show examples for the most popular libraries from Python.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship Between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML Models
More comprehensible explainability visualizations increase perceived model bias and decrease trust, with bias perception mediating the negative comprehension-trust relationship.
-
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
The midr package builds a global additive surrogate for any black-box model by least-squares projection with strict centering constraints, yielding interpretable main effects, interactions, and SHAP-style attributions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.