Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Against Scale: Provocations and Resistances to Scale Thinking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.08850 v2 pith:WLGVW6AQ submitted 2020-10-17 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords scalethinkingwhatheartsolutionstechnologicalworkcollaborative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

At the heart of what drives the bulk of innovation and activity in Silicon Valley and elsewhere is scalability. This unwavering commitment to scalability -- to identify strategies for efficient growth -- is at the heart of what we refer to as "scale thinking." Whether people are aware of it or not, scale thinking is all-encompassing. It is not just an attribute of one's product, service, or company, but frames how one thinks about the world (what constitutes it and how it can be observed and measured), its problems (what is a problem worth solving versus not), and the possible technological fixes for those problems. This paper examines different facets of scale thinking and its implication on how we view technology and collaborative work. We argue that technological solutions grounded in scale thinking are unlikely to be as liberatory or effective at deep, systemic change as their purveyors imagine. Rather, solutions which resist scale thinking are necessary to undo the social structures which lie at the heart of social inequality. We draw on recent work on mutual aid networks and propose questions to ask of collaborative work systems as a means to evaluate technological solutions and guide designers in identifying sites of resistance to scale thinking.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Examining the Expanding Role of Synthetic Data Throughout the AI Development Pipeline

    cs.HC 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Twenty-nine interviews show AI practitioners rely on synthetic data across nearly every pipeline stage while validation remains mostly manual spot-checking.

  2. Content Moderation Futures

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Content moderation professionals across industry, academia, and civil society describe platform governance as structurally undermined by growth incentives, underinvestment, and exploitative labor, and envision worker ...

  3. Irresponsible AI: big tech's influence on AI research and associated impacts

    cs.CY 2025-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review/position paper arguing that big tech's outsized influence on AI research channels the field toward scaling and general-purpose systems, producing environmental and social harms that technical fixes alone cann...

Pith tools