Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization for Accelerator Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.09824 v2 pith:RZWPU2GH submitted 2020-10-19 physics.acc-ph physics.comp-ph

classification physics.acc-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords optimizationmulti-objectiveacceleratormethodsacceleratorsbeamtuningbayesian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Particle accelerators require constant tuning during operation to meet beam quality, total charge and particle energy requirements for use in a wide variety of physics, chemistry and biology experiments. Maximizing the performance of an accelerator facility often necessitates multi-objective optimization, where operators must balance trade-offs between multiple objectives simultaneously, often using limited, temporally expensive beam observations. Usually, accelerator optimization problems are solved offline, prior to actual operation, with advanced beamline simulations and parallelized optimization methods (NSGA-II, Swarm Optimization). Unfortunately, it is not feasible to use these methods for online multi-objective optimization, since beam measurements can only be done in a serial fashion, and these optimization methods require a large number of measurements to converge to a useful solution.Here, we introduce a multi-objective Bayesian optimization scheme, which finds the full Pareto front of an accelerator optimization problem efficiently in a serialized manner and is thus a critical step towards practical online multi-objective optimization in accelerators.This method uses a set of Gaussian process surrogate models, along with a multi-objective acquisition function, which reduces the number of observations needed to converge by at least an order of magnitude over current methods.We demonstrate how this method can be modified to specifically solve optimization challenges posed by the tuning of accelerators.This includes the addition of optimization constraints, objective preferences and costs related to changing accelerator parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Autonomous discovery of accelerator commissioning algorithms

    physics.acc-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An autonomous loop lets a language-model agent write and refine RF beam-capture procedures in an ALS-U accumulator-ring simulator, improving on the published expert procedure by roughly a factor of ten.

Pith tools