Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Biased TextRank: Unsupervised Graph-Based Content Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.01026 v1 pith:O3UC5RPJ submitted 2020-11-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords textrankbiasedextractioncontentaccordingalgorithmfocusfocused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Biased TextRank, a graph-based content extraction method inspired by the popular TextRank algorithm that ranks text spans according to their importance for language processing tasks and according to their relevance to an input "focus." Biased TextRank enables focused content extraction for text by modifying the random restarts in the execution of TextRank. The random restart probabilities are assigned based on the relevance of the graph nodes to the focus of the task. We present two applications of Biased TextRank: focused summarization and explanation extraction, and show that our algorithm leads to improved performance on two different datasets by significant ROUGE-N score margins. Much like its predecessor, Biased TextRank is unsupervised, easy to implement and orders of magnitude faster and lighter than current state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing methods for similar tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TrumorGPT: Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model for Fact-Checking

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A GPT-4-based fact-checking system with graph retrieval reports 88.5% binary accuracy on PolitiFact health claims, but the improvement over GPT-4 is not shown to come from the graph component.

Pith tools