Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the role of planning in model-based deep reinforcement learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.04021 v2 pith:FYIKN2JA submitted 2020-11-08 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords planningmbrllearningmodel-baseddeepdrivegeneralizationmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model-based planning is often thought to be necessary for deep, careful reasoning and generalization in artificial agents. While recent successes of model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) with deep function approximation have strengthened this hypothesis, the resulting diversity of model-based methods has also made it difficult to track which components drive success and why. In this paper, we seek to disentangle the contributions of recent methods by focusing on three questions: (1) How does planning benefit MBRL agents? (2) Within planning, what choices drive performance? (3) To what extent does planning improve generalization? To answer these questions, we study the performance of MuZero (Schrittwieser et al., 2019), a state-of-the-art MBRL algorithm with strong connections and overlapping components with many other MBRL algorithms. We perform a number of interventions and ablations of MuZero across a wide range of environments, including control tasks, Atari, and 9x9 Go. Our results suggest the following: (1) Planning is most useful in the learning process, both for policy updates and for providing a more useful data distribution. (2) Using shallow trees with simple Monte-Carlo rollouts is as performant as more complex methods, except in the most difficult reasoning tasks. (3) Planning alone is insufficient to drive strong generalization. These results indicate where and how to utilize planning in reinforcement learning settings, and highlight a number of open questions for future MBRL research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Forget-and-Grow Strategy for Deep Reinforcement Learning Scaling in Continuous Control

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Forget and Grow (FoG) combines decaying replay weights for old experiences with progressive critic-network expansion to improve continuous-control reinforcement learning, beating BRO, SimBa, and TD-MPC2 on most of 41 ...

  2. Bounding Distributional Shifts in World Modeling through Novelty Detection

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Attaching a VAE novelty detector to the DINO-WM world model and penalizing out-of-distribution predicted states in CEM planning lowers Chamfer distance on small-data robot manipulation benchmarks.

Pith tools