Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantifying Sources of Uncertainty in Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.08413 v2 pith:AZSFDUDD submitted 2020-11-17 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords uncertaintyreconstructiondeepimagealeatoricangleconventionalepistemic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Image reconstruction methods based on deep neural networks have shown outstanding performance, equalling or exceeding the state-of-the-art results of conventional approaches, but often do not provide uncertainty information about the reconstruction. In this work we propose a scalable and efficient framework to simultaneously quantify aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in learned iterative image reconstruction. We build on a Bayesian deep gradient descent method for quantifying epistemic uncertainty, and incorporate the heteroscedastic variance of the noise to account for the aleatoric uncertainty. We show that our method exhibits competitive performance against conventional benchmarks for computed tomography with both sparse view and limited angle data. The estimated uncertainty captures the variability in the reconstructions, caused by the restricted measurement model, and by missing information, due to the limited angle geometry.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Impact of Solar Particle Events on Space Radiation Shielding: OLTARIS Simulation and Quantum Optimization of Material Selection using QAOA and VQE Algorithms

    physics.med-ph 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract claims quantum-optimized shielding material selection, but the full text is an unrelated 3D Gaussian Splatting paper, so the claim is unsupported.

Pith tools