Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Near-Optimal Statistical Query Hardness of Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.09720 v3 pith:HV5ADZX4 submitted 2020-12-17 cs.LG cs.CCmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

classification cs.LGcs.CCmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords massarterrorhalfspaceslearningmathrmknownboundepsilon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the problem of PAC learning halfspaces with Massart noise. Given labeled samples $(x, y)$ from a distribution $D$ on $\mathbb{R}^{d} \times \{ \pm 1\}$ such that the marginal $D_x$ on the examples is arbitrary and the label $y$ of example $x$ is generated from the target halfspace corrupted by a Massart adversary with flipping probability $\eta(x) \leq \eta \leq 1/2$, the goal is to compute a hypothesis with small misclassification error. The best known $\mathrm{poly}(d, 1/\epsilon)$-time algorithms for this problem achieve error of $\eta+\epsilon$, which can be far from the optimal bound of $\mathrm{OPT}+\epsilon$, where $\mathrm{OPT} = \mathbf{E}_{x \sim D_x} [\eta(x)]$. While it is known that achieving $\mathrm{OPT}+o(1)$ error requires super-polynomial time in the Statistical Query model, a large gap remains between known upper and lower bounds. In this work, we essentially characterize the efficient learnability of Massart halfspaces in the Statistical Query (SQ) model. Specifically, we show that no efficient SQ algorithm for learning Massart halfspaces on $\mathbb{R}^d$ can achieve error better than $\Omega(\eta)$, even if $\mathrm{OPT} = 2^{-\log^{c} (d)}$, for any universal constant $c \in (0, 1)$. Furthermore, when the noise upper bound $\eta$ is close to $1/2$, our error lower bound becomes $\eta - o_{\eta}(1)$, where the $o_{\eta}(1)$ term goes to $0$ when $\eta$ approaches $1/2$. Our results provide strong evidence that known learning algorithms for Massart halfspaces are nearly best possible, thereby resolving a longstanding open problem in learning theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Noisy Halfspaces with a Margin: Massart is No Harder than Random

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The Perspectron algorithm matches the random-noise sample complexity for PAC learning halfspaces with Massart noise, and extends to generalized linear models.

  2. A Near-optimal Algorithm for Learning Margin Halfspaces with Massart Noise

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    An online stochastic gradient descent algorithm learns gamma-margin halfspaces under Massart noise with O~(1/(gamma^2 epsilon^2)) samples, nearly matching the information-computation tradeoff lower bound.

Pith tools