Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Biased Models Have Biased Explanations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.10986 v1 pith:G2YVBYRH submitted 2020-12-20 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords fairnessexplanationsbiasedmodelsgrouplearningmachinemitigation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study fairness in Machine Learning (FairML) through the lens of attribute-based explanations generated for machine learning models. Our hypothesis is: Biased Models have Biased Explanations. To establish that, we first translate existing statistical notions of group fairness and define these notions in terms of explanations given by the model. Then, we propose a novel way of detecting (un)fairness for any black box model. We further look at post-processing techniques for fairness and reason how explanations can be used to make a bias mitigation technique more individually fair. We also introduce a novel post-processing mitigation technique which increases individual fairness in recourse while maintaining group level fairness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    MUPAX's feature importance is a weighted average of masked inputs selected for low loss, and its accuracy gains stem from using ground-truth labels during mask selection.

Pith tools