REVIEW 2 cited by
SWA Object Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Do you want to improve 1.0 AP for your object detector without any inference cost and any change to your detector? Let us tell you such a recipe. It is surprisingly simple: train your detector for an extra 12 epochs using cyclical learning rates and then average these 12 checkpoints as your final detection model}. This potent recipe is inspired by Stochastic Weights Averaging (SWA), which is proposed in arXiv:1803.05407 for improving generalization in deep neural networks. We found it also very effective in object detection. In this technique report, we systematically investigate the effects of applying SWA to object detection as well as instance segmentation. Through extensive experiments, we discover the aforementioned workable policy of performing SWA in object detection, and we consistently achieve $\sim$1.0 AP improvement over various popular detectors on the challenging COCO benchmark, including Mask RCNN, Faster RCNN, RetinaNet, FCOS, YOLOv3 and VFNet. We hope this work will make more researchers in object detection know this technique and help them train better object detectors. Code is available at: https://github.com/hyz-xmaster/swa_object_detection .
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CAME-AB: Cross-Modality Attention with Mixture-of-Experts for Antibody Binding Site Prediction
CAME-AB fuses five protein sequence, structural, and chemical encodings with adaptive fusion, mixture-of-experts, and contrastive learning to improve antibody epitope class prediction.
-
Data-Efficient Challenges in Visual Inductive Priors: A Retrospective
A retrospective of four data-limited computer vision challenges finds that ensembles and heavy augmentation, not novel inductive priors, drove winning performance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.