REVIEW 1 cited by
The combinatorial equivalence of a computability theoretic question
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The combinatorial equivalence of a computability theoretic question
read the original abstract
We show that a question of Miller and Solomon -- that whether there exists a coloring $c:d^{<\omega}\rightarrow k$ that does not admit a $c$-computable variable word infinite solution, is equivalent to a natural, nontrivial combinatorial question. The combinatorial question asked whether there is an infinite sequence of integers such that each of its initial segment satisfies a Ramsian type property. This is the first computability theoretic question known to be equivalent to a natural, nontrivial question that does not concern complexity notions. It turns out that the negation of the combinatorial question is a generalization of Hales-Jewett theorem. We solve some special cases of the combinatorial question and obtain a generalization of Hales-Jewett theorem on some particular parameters.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Enhancing Factual Accuracy and Citation Generation in LLMs via Multi-Stage Self-Verification
The paper proposes a four-stage self-verification prompting method but explicitly labels its experimental results as fabricated, so it cannot support its claimed gains.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.