Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Retrieving and Reading: A Comprehensive Survey on Open-domain Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.00774 v3 pith:XMWX7NA2 submitted 2021-01-04 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords openqasystemsresearchquestiontechniquesansweringarchitecturebeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Open-domain Question Answering (OpenQA) is an important task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), which aims to answer a question in the form of natural language based on large-scale unstructured documents. Recently, there has been a surge in the amount of research literature on OpenQA, particularly on techniques that integrate with neural Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC). While these research works have advanced performance to new heights on benchmark datasets, they have been rarely covered in existing surveys on QA systems. In this work, we review the latest research trends in OpenQA, with particular attention to systems that incorporate neural MRC techniques. Specifically, we begin with revisiting the origin and development of OpenQA systems. We then introduce modern OpenQA architecture named "Retriever-Reader" and analyze the various systems that follow this architecture as well as the specific techniques adopted in each of the components. We then discuss key challenges to developing OpenQA systems and offer an analysis of benchmarks that are commonly used. We hope our work would enable researchers to be informed of the recent advancement and also the open challenges in OpenQA research, so as to stimulate further progress in this field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KnowTrace: Bootstrapping Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Structured Knowledge Tracing

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    KnowTrace builds a question-specific knowledge graph during iterative retrieval and uses backtracing to filter useful reasoning steps, improving multi-hop QA and self-bootstrapping.

  2. Reliable Reasoning Path: Distilling Effective Guidance for LLM Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RRP generates semantic and structural reasoning paths, reranks them with a rethinking module, and reports SOTA Hits@1 of 90.0 on WebQSP and 64.5 on CWQ.

  3. Context-Aware Search and Retrieval Over Erasure Channels

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A bivariate Gaussian approximation yields a formula for the retrieval error probability in two-document TF-IDF search over an erasure channel with repetition coding.

  4. Enhancing Large Language Models with Reliable Knowledge Graphs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A thesis composed of four published papers proposes contrastive KG error detection, attribute-aware error-aware embedding, inductive graph completion, and KG prompting, but adds no new result beyond those papers.

Pith tools